glmmPQL does not fit by maximum likelihood, and what is being quoted is
not a likelihood for the original problem.
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Andrew Perrin wrote:
> Greetings-
>
> a reviewer for a paper of mine noted an anomaly in some models I ran using
> glmmPQL (from the MASS package). Specifically, the models are three-level
> hierarchical probit models estimated using PQL under R. The anomaly is
> that the log-likelihoods decrease (or, alternatively -2logLik increases)
> as variables are added to the null model. This is unusual, and I'm
trying
> to figure out how to interpret it. I've found some indication (e.g.,
at
> http://www.ssicentral.com/hlm/hlm00150.htm) that PQL estimation doesn't
> produce meaningful log-likelihoods, but I'm suspicious of that claim.
Any
> comments or advice would be helpful.
--
Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595