Liaw, Andy
2003-Aug-18 12:26 UTC
[R] Any interest in commercial add-on libraries based on Cyte l's StatXact/LogXact?
Another example: Jerry Friedman's MART is available in R from Salford for the same price as the stand-alone TreeNet, even though they don't advertise it on their web site. Andy> -----Original Message----- > From: rossini at blindglobe.net [mailto:rossini at blindglobe.net] > Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2003 9:50 PM > To: rhelp > Cc: pralay at cytel.com > Subject: [R] Any interest in commercial add-on libraries > based on Cytel's StatXact/LogXact? > > > > At JSM, I spent a bit of time with old friends at the Cytel > booth (makers of StatXact/LogXact). They were wondering > whether it was both feasible and of interest to create a > package of the StatXact compute engine for R (to be > commercially licensed, not for free!), similar to what > they've done for SAS. > > As far as I know, it's feasible, > > (this is not the first commercial external package, for those of > you about to scream "no, we can't allow commercial libraries!"; in > fact, you'd probably have to fork the R codebase if you truly > insist on that. For example,CSIRO's Spot package for R, > http://spot.cmis.csiro.au/spot/index.php) > > and so that remaining question is whether there would be > sufficient interest for them to continue exploring the > possibility from a financial perspective. > > Since it's not really on-topic for discussion on this mailing > list, if you are interested and would imagine purchasing a > license, please send mail to Pralay Senchaudhuri, pralay AT > cytel.com. I'd imagine that the licensing fees would be > similar to those charged for SAS or the standalone windows > versions, but that is only my conjecture, and not Cytel's. > > (Truth in Advertising: my main interest is to make it easier > to use their software for my work in clinical trials protocol > design; I currently access their implementation through SAS. > Also, while I am not currently involved with Cytel in any way > (nor will be in the foreseeable future), I did spend part of > 2 months editing and validating the examples from an early > version of the LogXact manual as a grad student around 12 > years ago, and have a number of good friends who still work there). > > best, > -tony > > -- > A.J. Rossini > rossini at u.washington.edu > http://www.analytics.washington.edu/ > Biomedical and Health > Informatics University of Washington > Biostatistics, SCHARP/HVTN Fred Hutchinson Cancer > Research Center > UW : FAX=206-543-3461 | moving soon to a > permanent office > FHCRC: 206-667-7025 FAX=206-667-4812 | Voicemail is pretty > sketchy/use Email > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message and any > attachme...{{dropped}} > > ______________________________________________ > R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list > https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo> /r-help >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains information of Merck & Co., Inc. (Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA), and/or its affiliates (which may be known outside the United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp & Dohme or MSD) that may be confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by e-mail and then delete it.
Apparently Analagous Threads
- Any interest in commercial add-on libraries based on Cytel's StatXact/LogXact?
- Help: StatXact
- Exact wilcoxon may differ in R and SPSS/StatXact (due to round off in the latter pair)
- exact confidence intervals for conditional logistic regression
- Agents/Queues - Drops call after 60 seconds