R help - Jan 2003 - R-release.diff.gz: "patch detected! Assume -R? [n]"

Hi!

I'm upgrading to 1.6.2. (linux suse7.3). 
I see that there is
a patch in R-release.diff.gz.

1. Is this patch stable? In other words, is
it adviced that I install R-release.diff.gz ?

2. When I do:

zcat R-release.diff.gz | patch -p1 -E

I get many lines such as:

patching file AUTHORS
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n]

Should I just accept the default answer?

Thanks

Agus

Dr. Agustin Lobo
Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra (CSIC)
Lluis Sole Sabaris s/n
08028 Barcelona SPAIN
tel 34 93409 5410
fax 34 93411 0012
alobo at ija.csic.es

>>>>> "AgusL" == Agustin Lobo <alobo at
ija.csic.es>
>>>>>     on Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:54:21 +0100 (MET) writes:
    AgusL> Hi!  I'm upgrading to 1.6.2. (linux suse7.3).  I see
    AgusL> that there is a patch in R-release.diff.gz.

    AgusL> 1. Is this patch stable? In other words, is it
    AgusL> adviced that I install R-release.diff.gz ?

1)
 The diff file is an old "institution" that started long before
 "rsync" and in times with much smaller net bandwidth.
 Working with them may make sense if you have a slow or
 expensive internet connection and/or if you are interested in R
 development on a low level. 
2) 
 I'm the one responsible for these.
3)
 In principle this file tracks the difference from the last
 released version to the current (non-released!) "R-patched"
 working version.

4) They do NOT contain any changes in the recommended packages.
   ``Hence it is really not the whole story''

As I realize this is not the case currently
(it rather looks like a diff from "1.6.1" or so).
This should be changed soon.

---

Short summary: normal users should use the tar files (if
      compiling from source) or the binary release versions in
      any case!



    AgusL> 2. When I do:

    AgusL> zcat R-release.diff.gz | patch -p1 -E

in which directory?  1.6.2 or 1.6.1 ?
(you can answer privately to me)

    AgusL> I get many lines such as:

    AgusL> patching file AUTHORS Reversed (or previously
    AgusL> applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n]

    AgusL> Should I just accept the default answer?

no, don't use that file at all.

Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch>
http://stat.ethz.ch/~maechler/
Seminar fuer Statistik, ETH-Zentrum  LEO C16	Leonhardstr. 27
ETH (Federal Inst. Technology)	8092 Zurich	SWITZERLAND
phone: x-41-1-632-3408		fax: ...-1228			<><