search for: detected

Hi, I've finally got running Asterisk 1.2.14 with UniCall & MFC/R2 patches, I can generate calls and all seems OK but I cannot receive any call, this is what I get: MFC/R2 UniCall/3 <- 0001 [1/IDLE /Idle /Idle ] MFC/R2 UniCall/3 Detected MFC/R2 UniCall/3 Creating a new call with CRN 32769 MFC/R2 UniCall/3 1101 -> [2/DETECTED/Seize ack/Seize ack ] Unicall/3 event Detected MFC/R2 UniCall/3 <- 8 on [2/DETECTED/Seize ack/Seize ack ] MFC/R2 UniCall/3 1 on -> [2/DETECTED/Group A /DNIS request] MFC/R2 UniC...

...detect scops, but I still believe that a bottom up detection is the right way to go. However, to abort early we need to classify the scop detection failures into failures that will equally hold for larger scops and ones that may disappear in larger scops. Only if a failure of the first class was detected, we can abort early without reducing scop coverage. > Do you have any other suggestions that may speed up the scop detection pass? I believe bottom-up detection may be a good thing, but before drawing conclusions we need to understand where time is actually spent. The suggestions above shoul...

Hi all, I have investigated the compile-time overhead of "Polly Scop Detection" pass based on LNT testing results. This mail is to share some results I have found. (1) Analysis of "SCOP Detection Pass" for PolyBench (Attached file PolyBench_SCoPs.log) Experimental results show that the "SCOP Detection pass" does not lead to significant extra compile-time

...2,Hangup When I attempt to call these extensions I get: *CLI> dial 3501 -- Executing Dial("OSS/dsp", "Zap/2|60") in new stack -- Called 2 -- Zap/2-1 is ringing -- Zap/2-1 is ringing Aug 2 12:59:50 WARNING[3397]: chan_zap.c:5684 handle_init_event: Detected alarm on channel 1: Yellow Alarm Aug 2 12:59:50 WARNING[3397]: chan_zap.c:5684 handle_init_event: Detected alarm on channel 3: Yellow Alarm Aug 2 12:59:50 WARNING[3397]: chan_zap.c:5684 handle_init_event: Detected alarm on channel 4: Yellow Alarm Aug 2 12:59:50 WARNING[3397]: chan_zap.c:5684...

...ation of PBX in the network side of the PRI (no DIDs, 30 B channels and one header). These are the messages that I got in the CLI: 051008-153001 WARNING[27660]: chan_zap.c:7182 zt_pri_error: PRI: Short write: -1/15 (Unknown error 500) 051008-153001 WARNING[27660]: chan_zap.c:3195 zt_handle_event: Detected alarm on channel 1: Yellow Alarm -- Hungup 'Zap/1-1' == No one is available to answer at this time 051008-153001 WARNING[27660]: chan_zap.c:5684 handle_init_event: Detected alarm on channel 2: Yellow Alarm 051008-153001 WARNING[27660]: chan_zap.c:5684 handle_init_event: Detected alarm...

...8.211.in-addr.arpa' (in '254.58.211.in-addr.arpa'?): [210.94.0.7].53 'ns.hananet.net' Nov 25 11:33:36 ns named[10478]: ns_forw: query(55.254.58.211.in-addr.arpa) All possible A RR's lame Nov 25 11:33:45 ns sshd[10689]: Disconnecting: crc32 compensation attack: network attack detected Nov 25 11:33:45 ns sshd[10690]: Disconnecting: crc32 compensation attack: network attack detected Nov 25 11:33:46 ns sshd[10691]: Disconnecting: crc32 compensation attack: network attack detected Nov 25 11:33:46 ns sshd[10692]: Disconnecting: crc32 compensation attack: network attack detected Nov 2...

...vidia Quadro P600) with CentOS 6.9. Running nvidia-detect with this setup gives the following output: # nvidia-detect Error getting device_class nvidia-detect also quits with exit-code 255. Could this be a bug in nvidia-detect? Or is it an unsupported configuration? The following hardware is detected, it seems some sort of unknown Intel device is detected by the OS: # lspci | grep VGA 00:1f.5 Non-VGA unclassified device: Intel Corporation Device a2a4 21:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation Device 1cb2 (rev a1) # lspci -n | egrep '00:1f.5|21:00.0' 00:1f.5 0000:...

...39;t place calls to the pbx. When I receive a call from the telco I place it directly to the pbx.. and that works ok: Jan 16 12:27:01 DEBUG[4136] chan_unicall.c: MFC/R2 UniCall/2 <- 0001 [1/IDLE /Idle /Idle ] Jan 16 12:27:01 DEBUG[4136] chan_unicall.c: MFC/R2 UniCall/2 Detected Jan 16 12:27:01 DEBUG[4136] chan_unicall.c: MFC/R2 UniCall/2 Creating a new call with CRN 32770 Jan 16 12:27:01 DEBUG[4136] chan_unicall.c: MFC/R2 UniCall/2 1101 -> [2/DETECTED/Seize ack /Seize ack ] Jan 16 12:27:01 NOTICE[4136] chan_unicall.c: Unicall/2 event Detected Jan 16 12:27:01 DE...

Hi, I played around with the combination of rsync --detect-renamed --detect-moved and -b. Given the following tree: src/dir/file dest/src/dir/file I renamed src/dir to src/dir2 and ran the following command: rsync -a --detect-renamed --detect-moved --delete -b --backup-dir=bak src dest ending up with: dest/bak/src/dir/file Is it supposed to do that? I was expecting it to detect the renamed

On 07/01/2013 06:51 AM, Star Tan wrote: >> Great. Now we have two test cases we can work with. Can you > >> upload the LLVM-IR produced by clang -O0 (without Polly)? > Since tramp3d-v4.ll is to large (19M with 267 thousand lines), I would focus on the oggenc benchmark at firat. > I attached the oggenc.ll (LLVM-IR produced by clang -O0 without Polly), which compressed into the

Hi all, I have a Diva Server V-BRI-2 card, which support, as written in reference guide: Extended tone processing (human talker detection, generation and detection of country-specific tones) I would like to detect human speech and fax tone with asterisk. I think that the diva card transmit a DTMF code when detecting voice, but chan_capi doesn't receive this DTMF code. I verbose it

>Great. Now we have two test cases we can work with. Can you >upload the LLVM-IR produced by clang -O0 (without Polly)? Since tramp3d-v4.ll is to large (19M with 267 thousand lines), I would focus on the oggenc benchmark at firat. I attached the oggenc.ll (LLVM-IR produced by clang -O0 without Polly), which compressed into the file oggenc.tgz. >2) Check why the Polly scop detection is

...having odd results. I set faxdetect=incoming last night and restarted dahdi and asterisk. Since that time, we have received 17 faxes, but I only have three fax detections in my asterisk log, so far as I can tell: # grep -i fax /var/log/asterisk/full [Jan 5 05:53:39] NOTICE[6686] chan_dahdi.c: Fax detected, but no fax extension [Jan 5 10:24:27] NOTICE[11834] chan_dahdi.c: Fax detected, but no fax extension [Jan 5 11:48:52] NOTICE[13804] chan_dahdi.c: Fax detected, but no fax extension All three calls listed are indeed fax calls, and since there is no fax extension in that context, the call just pr...

...ay, but today it happened 5 times. Even once is too many. Every call in progress is dropped. Please help! What do I need to do? What can I try? I've googled and searched this list and can't find anything. Here's an example from the logs: Feb 7 13:37:54 WARNING[32451] chan_zap.c: Detected alarm on channel 6: Red Alarm Feb 7 13:37:54 WARNING[32238] chan_zap.c: Detected alarm on channel 1: Red Alarm Feb 7 13:37:54 WARNING[32546] chan_zap.c: Detected alarm on channel 2: Red Alarm Feb 7 13:37:54 WARNING[32477] chan_zap.c: Detected alarm on channel 3: Red Alarm Feb 7 13:37:54 WARNING...

...on Primary D-channel of span 1 == Primary D-Channel on span 1 up == Restart on requested on entire span 1 Mar 31 14:34:08 NOTICE[2361]: chan_zap.c:9112 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Mar 31 14:34:08 WARNING[2362]: chan_zap.c:6899 handle_init_event: Detected alarm on channel 1: Red Alarm Mar 31 14:34:08 WARNING[2362]: chan_zap.c:6899 handle_init_event: Detected alarm on channel 2: Red Alarm Mar 31 14:34:08 WARNING[2362]: chan_zap.c:6899 handle_init_event: Detected alarm on channel 3: Red Alarm Mar 31 14:34:08 WARNING[2362]: chan_zap.c:6899 handle_ini...

...ut I still believe that a bottom up detection is the >right way to go. However, to abort early we need to classify the scop >detection failures into failures that will equally hold for larger scops >and ones that may disappear in larger scops. Only if a failure of the >first class was detected, we can abort early without reducing scop coverage. > >> Do you have any other suggestions that may speed up the scop detection pass? > >I believe bottom-up detection may be a good thing, but before drawing >conclusions we need to understand where time is actually spent. The &gt...

>> (3) About detecting scop regions in bottom-up order. >> Detecting scop regions in bottom-up order can significantly speed up the scop detection pass. However, as I have discussed with Sebastian, detecting scops in bottom-up order and up-bottom order will lead to different results. As a result, we should not change the detection order. > >Sebastian had a patch for this. Does

dear Hackers, i have a voicetronix Openswitch card, and i have been finding it very dificult to get it to work with asterisk. i intend to connect 8 ports to the PSTN and 4 as station ports. problem 1: On running asterisk all i get at first i get : event[9=>[11] station OFF hook] on vpb/1-12 even [12=>[11] loop drop on vpb/1-12 event [12=>[11] Tone detect:GRUNT event [2=>[11] Dial

...e that advising people to focus on detection rather than prevention is wrong-headed. What are you going to do after you detect the attacker? If it's not "prevent him from doing anything", then I question the intelligence of this approach. Root-level compromises don't always get detected immediately, don't always get caught, and once they're in, the playing field is level, and they are very time-consuming to investigate and clean. For example, I know someone with a rootkit that he can install to flash on an add-in card for a device that has DMA access to main memory. For...

We are receiving LOTS of emails that contain empty XLS or DOC documents with embedded virus macros. These are getting past SPAMASSASSIN, Clamav and Kaspersky. I'm trying to write a filter for EXIM to block these emails but I need to know a good, quick, command-line to detect an empty doc with a macro. Is there anything available that I can use?? I have managed to write a PERL script to