> Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 18:40:16 +0200 (MET DST)
> From: Agustin Lobo <alobo at ija.csic.es>
>
> Dear R makers and users:
>
> After reading the FAQ and the comments on the
> comparison between R and S, I still have an important
> (at least for me) question: How is R compared
> to the new version of Splus 5.0 (for unix including Linux)?
The current version of S-PLUS for Unix/Linux is 5.1. This is
not being pedantic: its memory management is much better than 5.0.
It is likely that 5.1 has not yet reached European distributors,
but it is imminent.
> I must pay particular atention to the efficiency
> with large datasets and, more generally speaking,
> to the efficiency with memory management.
> I use Splus since version 3.x (on Unix) and now
> use Splus 4.5 for Windows (which gives me tons
> of memory problems). I'm considering whether
> going on with Splus and get Splus 5.0 for Linux
> or switch to R or to X-ploRe.
>
> I normally use Splus to process (large)
> datasets retrieved from multi-spectral remotely-sensed
> imagery.
I would say this has much more to do with programming well than the
choice between S-PLUS and R. I have happily processed time-series of
MRI images on my (192Mb RAM) laptop in all of S-PLUS 4.5, 5.1 and
pre-R-0.64.2. These are large (ca 50Mb per dataset). What `well'
means differs between these systems.
--
Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272860 (secr)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at
stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
