Hi,
I wonder if this is a feature or a bug:
> isGeneric("&&")
Error in genericForPrimitive(f) :
methods may not be defined for primitive function ?&&? in this
version of R
> isGeneric(":")
Error in genericForPrimitive(f) :
methods may not be defined for primitive function ?:? in this
version of R
According to the man page:
?isGeneric?: Is there a function named ?f?, and if so, is it a
generic?
So it sounds like it should be a YES or NO answer.
In any case the error message is confusing: it suggests that I'm trying
to define methods for "&&", but I'm not.
This is with R 2.13, R 2.14 and R 2.15.0 alpha.
Thanks,
H.
--
Herv? Pag?s
Program in Computational Biology
Division of Public Health Sciences
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
1100 Fairview Ave. N, M1-B514
P.O. Box 19024
Seattle, WA 98109-1024
E-mail: hpages at fhcrc.org
Phone: (206) 667-5791
Fax: (206) 667-1319
Bug. Should be fixed (rev 58642) in r-devel and R 2.15.0 alpha. Thanks. On 3/7/12 3:30 PM, Herv? Pag?s wrote:> Hi, > > I wonder if this is a feature or a bug: > > > isGeneric("&&") > Error in genericForPrimitive(f) : > methods may not be defined for primitive function ?&&? in this > version of R > > isGeneric(":") > Error in genericForPrimitive(f) : > methods may not be defined for primitive function ?:? in this > version of R > > According to the man page: > > ?isGeneric?: Is there a function named ?f?, and if so, is it a > generic? > > So it sounds like it should be a YES or NO answer. > > In any case the error message is confusing: it suggests that I'm trying > to define methods for "&&", but I'm not. > > This is with R 2.13, R 2.14 and R 2.15.0 alpha. > > Thanks, > H. >
Seemingly Similar Threads
- does isGeneric work differently in 1.8.0 ?
- S4 group "Math", "getGroupMembers", "genericForPrimitive"
- reducing redundant work in methods package
- Unexpected side effect of the ":::" operator on the value of isGeneric
- reducing redundant work in methods package