Hi, I wonder if this is a feature or a bug: > isGeneric("&&") Error in genericForPrimitive(f) : methods may not be defined for primitive function ?&&? in this version of R > isGeneric(":") Error in genericForPrimitive(f) : methods may not be defined for primitive function ?:? in this version of R According to the man page: ?isGeneric?: Is there a function named ?f?, and if so, is it a generic? So it sounds like it should be a YES or NO answer. In any case the error message is confusing: it suggests that I'm trying to define methods for "&&", but I'm not. This is with R 2.13, R 2.14 and R 2.15.0 alpha. Thanks, H. -- Herv? Pag?s Program in Computational Biology Division of Public Health Sciences Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1100 Fairview Ave. N, M1-B514 P.O. Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109-1024 E-mail: hpages at fhcrc.org Phone: (206) 667-5791 Fax: (206) 667-1319
Bug. Should be fixed (rev 58642) in r-devel and R 2.15.0 alpha. Thanks. On 3/7/12 3:30 PM, Herv? Pag?s wrote:> Hi, > > I wonder if this is a feature or a bug: > > > isGeneric("&&") > Error in genericForPrimitive(f) : > methods may not be defined for primitive function ?&&? in this > version of R > > isGeneric(":") > Error in genericForPrimitive(f) : > methods may not be defined for primitive function ?:? in this > version of R > > According to the man page: > > ?isGeneric?: Is there a function named ?f?, and if so, is it a > generic? > > So it sounds like it should be a YES or NO answer. > > In any case the error message is confusing: it suggests that I'm trying > to define methods for "&&", but I'm not. > > This is with R 2.13, R 2.14 and R 2.15.0 alpha. > > Thanks, > H. >
Possibly Parallel Threads
- does isGeneric work differently in 1.8.0 ?
- S4 group "Math", "getGroupMembers", "genericForPrimitive"
- reducing redundant work in methods package
- Unexpected side effect of the ":::" operator on the value of isGeneric
- reducing redundant work in methods package