R devel - Jun 2011 - Log file of building vignette in RCMD check

Hello,

I am trying to run "RCMD check" on a package. It performs OK, with the
exception of a single warning:
* checking package vignettes in 'inst/doc' ... WARNING
Package vignette(s) without corresponding PDF:
   AnnotationFuncsUserguide.Rnw

As I understand the problem, the vignette is not built. However, I have no
problems in doing so manually.
How do I fix this problem? I cannot find any logs for building the vignette,
however the output from building the pdf-file of the manual is found in the
.Rcheck folder.

On a similar note, as my vignette includes a biblio, I have to run
"latex" twice to get the citations referenced properly with a number.
Is this an issue? How can I work around it? (The package is submitted to BioC,
so there might be other rules there?)

Thank you in advanced.
Yours sincerely,

Stefan McKinnon H?j-Edwards     Dept. of Genetics and Biotechnology
PhD student                     Faculty of Agricultural Sciences
stefan.hoj-edwards at agrsci.dk    Aarhus University
Tel.: +45 8999 1291             Blichers All? 20, Postboks 50
Web: www.iysik.com              DK-8830?Tjele
                                Tel.: +45 8999 1900
                                Web: www.agrsci.au.dk

On 06.06.2011 15:30, Stefan McKinnon H?j-Edwards wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to run "RCMD check" on a package. It performs OK,
with the exception of a single warning:
> * checking package vignettes in 'inst/doc' ... WARNING
> Package vignette(s) without corresponding PDF:
>     AnnotationFuncsUserguide.Rnw
R CMD build should build the vignettes. If it did not succeed, see its 
output for details.

Uwe Ligges


>
> As I understand the problem, the vignette is not built. However, I have no
problems in doing so manually.
> How do I fix this problem? I cannot find any logs for building the
vignette, however the output from building the pdf-file of the manual is found
in the .Rcheck folder.
>
> On a similar note, as my vignette includes a biblio, I have to run
"latex" twice to get the citations referenced properly with a number.
Is this an issue? How can I work around it? (The package is submitted to BioC,
so there might be other rules there?)
>
> Thank you in advanced.
> Yours sincerely,
>
> Stefan McKinnon H?j-Edwards     Dept. of Genetics and Biotechnology
> PhD student                     Faculty of Agricultural Sciences
> stefan.hoj-edwards at agrsci.dk    Aarhus University
> Tel.: +45 8999 1291             Blichers All? 20, Postboks 50
> Web: www.iysik.com              DK-8830 Tjele
>                                  Tel.: +45 8999 1900
>                                  Web: www.agrsci.au.dk
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel