Hello, This question popped up on the bioc-devel list, I'm forwarding it here. I know that sources for R-2.14 alpha can be found here: http://cran.r-project.org/src/base-prerelease/ But the OP (below) is asking about Windows binaries. Dan ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Stefan McKinnon H?j-Edwards <Stefan.Hoj-Edwards at agrsci.dk> Date: 2011/10/4 Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Bioc 2.9 New Package submissions. The October deadlines are fast approaching. To: "bioc-devel at r-project.org" <bioc-devel at r-project.org> According to the BioC release plan, we should use R-2.14.0 devel-alpha to check our packages. But on cran, we can either choose R 2.13.2 (http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/) or R 2.15.0 devel (http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/rdevel.html). Am I missing something? And will it again be possible to get the binaries for Windows of the 2.14.0 devel-alpha? Kind regards Stefan McKinnon H?j-Edwards ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Dept. of Molecular Biology and Genetics Ph.D. Fellow ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Aarhus University ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Blichers All? 20, Postboks 50 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? DK-8830 Tjele Tel.: +45 8715 7969 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Tel.: +45 8715 6000 Email: Stefan.Hoj-Edwards at agrsci.dk ? ? ?Web: www.agrsci.dk -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:36:15 -0700 From: Marc Carlson <mcarlson at fhcrc.org> To: bioc-devel at r-project.org Subject: [Bioc-devel] Bioc 2.9 New Package submissions. The October ? ? ? ?deadlines are fast approaching. Message-ID: <4E8A46EF.3030007 at fhcrc.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Dear Bioconductor developers, This announcement is for package authors who are in the process of developing packages for inclusion in the upcoming 2.9 release of Bioconductor in October. The deadline to make a submission for this release is going to be October 10th, 2011. Packages submitted after the deadline will probably not provide us with sufficient time for inclusion in this release. Earlier submissions are encouraged as it provides more time to correct issues raised during the review process and probably has an improved chance of making it into the release. If you do not have your package ready in time for this deadline, your package will still be included in our development branch of Bioconductor and will be scheduled for inclusion in the subsequent release version of Bioconductor. Other important deadlines to consider are listed on our Release schedule. If you have packages in the repository (and most of you do), it is probably a good idea to follow the following link and see the other deadlines that are approaching. http://www.bioconductor.org/developers/release-schedule/ Sincerely, ? The Biocore Team _______________________________________________ Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
I suspect that the Windows build system just hasn't caught on to the short time between 2.13.2 and the start of run-in for 2.14.0. I think the usual logic is that pre-releases of the next version replace the patch releases of the old one (by definition, there shouldn't be updates to 2.13.2 anyway). -pd On Oct 5, 2011, at 00:46 , Dan Tenenbaum wrote:> Hello, > This question popped up on the bioc-devel list, I'm forwarding it here. > > I know that sources for R-2.14 alpha can be found here: > > http://cran.r-project.org/src/base-prerelease/ > > But the OP (below) is asking about Windows binaries. > > Dan > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Stefan McKinnon H?j-Edwards <Stefan.Hoj-Edwards at agrsci.dk> > Date: 2011/10/4 > Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Bioc 2.9 New Package submissions. The > October deadlines are fast approaching. > To: "bioc-devel at r-project.org" <bioc-devel at r-project.org> > > > According to the BioC release plan, we should use R-2.14.0 devel-alpha > to check our packages. > But on cran, we can either choose R 2.13.2 > (http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/) or R 2.15.0 devel > (http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/rdevel.html). Am I missing > something? And will it again be possible to get the binaries for > Windows of the 2.14.0 devel-alpha? > > > Kind regards > Stefan McKinnon H?j-Edwards Dept. of Molecular Biology and Genetics > Ph.D. Fellow Aarhus University > Blichers All? 20, Postboks 50 > DK-8830 Tjele > Tel.: +45 8715 7969 Tel.: +45 8715 6000 > Email: Stefan.Hoj-Edwards at agrsci.dk Web: www.agrsci.dk > > > > > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:36:15 -0700 > From: Marc Carlson <mcarlson at fhcrc.org> > To: bioc-devel at r-project.org > Subject: [Bioc-devel] Bioc 2.9 New Package submissions. The October > deadlines are fast approaching. > Message-ID: <4E8A46EF.3030007 at fhcrc.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Dear Bioconductor developers, > > > This announcement is for package authors who are in the process of > developing packages for inclusion in the upcoming 2.9 release of > Bioconductor in October. > > The deadline to make a submission for this release is going to be > October 10th, 2011. Packages submitted after the deadline will probably > not provide us with sufficient time for inclusion in this release. > Earlier submissions are encouraged as it provides more time to correct > issues raised during the review process and probably has an improved > chance of making it into the release. > > If you do not have your package ready in time for this deadline, your > package will still be included in our development branch of Bioconductor > and will be scheduled for inclusion in the subsequent release version of > Bioconductor. > > > Other important deadlines to consider are listed on our Release > schedule. If you have packages in the repository (and most of you do), > it is probably a good idea to follow the following link and see the > other deadlines that are approaching. > > http://www.bioconductor.org/developers/release-schedule/ > > > > Sincerely, > > > The Biocore Team > > _______________________________________________ > Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel-- Peter Dalgaard, Professor, Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark Phone: (+45)38153501 Email: pd.mes at cbs.dk Priv: PDalgd at gmail.com
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Prof Brian Ripley <ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk> wrote:> An automated build (done on winbuilder) will take a few days: people are too > busy this week. > > For the time being, I have put a current Windows installer for R 2.14.0 > alpha at > http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/RWin/R-2.14.0alpha-win.exe > I am unlikely to update it often (and I too am busy this week).It looks like R 2.14.0 alpha is available on CRAN: http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/rdevel.html Thanks, Dan> > On Wed, 5 Oct 2011, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > >> On Wed, 5 Oct 2011, Peter Dalgaard wrote: >> >>> I suspect that the Windows build system just hasn't caught on to the >>> short time between 2.13.2 and the start of run-in for 2.14.0. I think the >>> usual logic is that pre-releases of the next version replace the patch >>> releases of the old one (by definition, there shouldn't be updates to 2.13.2 >>> anyway). >> >> Correct, but it also does not have a 'R 2.15.0 devel' (not that there is >> such a thing: R-devel does not have a version number). In fact it has >> >> ncftp /pub/R/bin/windows/base > ls -l >> ... >> -rw-rw-r-- ? ?1 0 ? ? ? ?1001 ? ? 40213201 Sep 30 19:18 R-2.13.2-win.exe >> -rw-rw-r-- ? ?1 0 ? ? ? ?1001 ? ? 41018043 Oct ?4 11:49 >> R-2.13.2patched-win.exe >> -rw-rw-r-- ? ?1 0 ? ? ? ?1001 ? ? 47707488 Oct ?2 10:45 >> R-2.14.0dev-win.exe >> ... >> >> so R-2.14.0dev-win.exe would be a pretty good surrogate for R 2.14.0 alpha >> until that is available. >> >>> >>> -pd >>> >>> On Oct 5, 2011, at 00:46 , Dan Tenenbaum wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> This question popped up on the bioc-devel list, I'm forwarding it here. >>>> >>>> I know that sources for R-2.14 alpha can be found here: >>>> >>>> http://cran.r-project.org/src/base-prerelease/ >>>> >>>> But the OP (below) is asking about Windows binaries. >>>> >>>> Dan >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>> From: Stefan McKinnon H?j-Edwards <Stefan.Hoj-Edwards at agrsci.dk> >>>> Date: 2011/10/4 >>>> Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Bioc 2.9 New Package submissions. The >>>> October deadlines are fast approaching. >>>> To: "bioc-devel at r-project.org" <bioc-devel at r-project.org> >>>> >>>> >>>> According to the BioC release plan, we should use R-2.14.0 devel-alpha >>>> to check our packages. >>>> But on cran, we can either choose R 2.13.2 >>>> (http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/) or R 2.15.0 devel >>>> (http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/rdevel.html). Am I missing >>>> something? And will it again be possible to get the binaries for >>>> Windows of the 2.14.0 devel-alpha? >>>> >>>> >>>> Kind regards >>>> Stefan McKinnon H?j-Edwards ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Dept. of Molecular Biology and >>>> Genetics >>>> Ph.D. Fellow ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Aarhus University >>>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Blichers All? 20, Postboks 50 >>>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?DK-8830 Tjele >>>> Tel.: +45 8715 7969 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Tel.: +45 8715 6000 >>>> Email: Stefan.Hoj-Edwards at agrsci.dk ? ? ?Web: www.agrsci.dk >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- >>>> Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:36:15 -0700 >>>> From: Marc Carlson <mcarlson at fhcrc.org> >>>> To: bioc-devel at r-project.org >>>> Subject: [Bioc-devel] Bioc 2.9 New Package submissions. The October >>>> ? ? ? deadlines are fast approaching. >>>> Message-ID: <4E8A46EF.3030007 at fhcrc.org> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >>>> >>>> Dear Bioconductor developers, >>>> >>>> >>>> This announcement is for package authors who are in the process of >>>> developing packages for inclusion in the upcoming 2.9 release of >>>> Bioconductor in October. >>>> >>>> The deadline to make a submission for this release is going to be >>>> October 10th, 2011. Packages submitted after the deadline will probably >>>> not provide us with sufficient time for inclusion in this release. >>>> Earlier submissions are encouraged as it provides more time to correct >>>> issues raised during the review process and probably has an improved >>>> chance of making it into the release. >>>> >>>> If you do not have your package ready in time for this deadline, your >>>> package will still be included in our development branch of Bioconductor >>>> and will be scheduled for inclusion in the subsequent release version of >>>> Bioconductor. >>>> >>>> >>>> Other important deadlines to consider are listed on our Release >>>> schedule. If you have packages in the repository (and most of you do), >>>> it is probably a good idea to follow the following link and see the >>>> other deadlines that are approaching. >>>> >>>> http://www.bioconductor.org/developers/release-schedule/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Sincerely, >>>> >>>> >>>> ?The Biocore Team >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list >>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel >>>> >>>> ______________________________________________ >>>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list >>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >>> >>> -- >>> Peter Dalgaard, Professor, >>> Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School >>> Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark >>> Phone: (+45)38153501 >>> Email: pd.mes at cbs.dk ?Priv: PDalgd at gmail.com >>> >>> ______________________________________________ >>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >>> >> >> -- >> Brian D. Ripley, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk >> Professor of Applied Statistics, ?http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ >> University of Oxford, ? ? ? ? ? ? Tel: ?+44 1865 272861 (self) >> 1 South Parks Road, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? +44 1865 272866 (PA) >> Oxford OX1 3TG, UK ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Fax: ?+44 1865 272595 > > -- > Brian D. Ripley, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk > Professor of Applied Statistics, ?http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ > University of Oxford, ? ? ? ? ? ? Tel: ?+44 1865 272861 (self) > 1 South Parks Road, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? +44 1865 272866 (PA) > Oxford OX1 3TG, UK ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Fax: ?+44 1865 272595
Seemingly Similar Threads
- Log file of building vignette in RCMD check
- Reading large, non-tabular files
- Problems with Rterm 2.13.0 - but not RGui
- R CMD check --force-multiarch does not install all the archs for testing
- Error in setMethod("combine"... was - Error when installing globaltest package