bnan@umich.edu
2003-Feb-10 17:21 UTC
[Rd] Pearson's residuals in logistic regression (PR#2539)
Full_Name: Bin Nan Version: 1.3.0 OS: Win32 Submission from: (NULL) (141.211.15.110) The function resid(fit, "pearson") seems not giving the same Pearson's residuals for logistic regression as what Splus does. I found the problem when I fitted glm with family = binomial using Crowder's seed data.
ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
2003-Feb-10 18:04 UTC
[Rd] Pearson's residuals in logistic regression (PR#2539)
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 bnan@umich.edu wrote:> Full_Name: Bin Nan > Version: 1.3.0^^^^^ That's way, way old. This has been changed since.> OS: Win32 > Submission from: (NULL) (141.211.15.110) > > > The function resid(fit, "pearson") seems not giving the same Pearson's residuals > for logistic regression as what Splus does. I found the problem when I fitted > glm with family = binomial using Crowder's seed data.-- Brian D. Ripley, ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
Peter Dalgaard BSA
2003-Feb-10 18:44 UTC
[Rd] Pearson's residuals in logistic regression (PR#2539)
bnan@umich.edu writes:> Full_Name: Bin Nan > Version: 1.3.0 > OS: Win32 > Submission from: (NULL) (141.211.15.110) > > > The function resid(fit, "pearson") seems not giving the same Pearson's residuals > for logistic regression as what Splus does. I found the problem when I fitted > glm with family = binomial using Crowder's seed data.1.3.0 is almost two years old. Some problems of that kind have long since been resolved. Do try a current version. -- O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3 c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 ~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907