free, and both myself and the Stanford OTL have been responsive to any
questions that might arise. The OpenSSH patches are clearly
RFC2945-based, and are unambiguously royalty-free. Isn't this exactly
what you praised USC and Xerox for just a moment ago?
> The other technologies are well established, and we are protected by the
> entire industry.
And it seems you are unwilling to allow SRP that same opportunity to
become "well-established" and "protected by the entire
industry" because
of some personal, emotional grudge against some group at Stanford, a
grudge that, as far as I can tell, may not even be shared by the other
OpenSSH developers.
Tom
--
Tom Wu
Principal Software Engineer
Arcot Systems
(408) 969-6124
"The Borg? Sounds Swedish..."
