similar to: No subject

>Simply stated, SRP is a strong password authentication protocol that >resists passive/active network attack, and when used in conjunction with >OpenSSH, solves the "unknown host key" problem without requiring host >key fingerprint verification or PKI deployment (e.g. X.509 certs). Put >another way, is there any good reason *not* to fold these patches into >OpenSSH

On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, RJ Atkinson wrote: > At 06:26 27/04/01, Tom Wu wrote: > >For those of you who were following the discussion about the new draft > >and implementation of SRP-based password authentication in OpenSSH, I > >promised to have Stanford issue the IETF an official, explicit, > >statement reiterating the unencumbered royalty-free licensing terms. > >The

G'day, First off, I'm not subscribed to the list, so if there are any responses that should be directed to me, feel free to CC me in :) The below url is an updated patch of Professor Tom's earlier SRP patches for SSH. The only things changed was so that it would compile on a newer openssh version. For more information regarding SRP, see http://srp.stanford.edu This isn't

I just joined the list, and I see in the archives that about a month ago there was a brief discussion of SRP, but it was dismissed. I urge people to take a look at this site: http://srp.stanford.edu/srp/ It's very cool. Let's say I'm on vacation visiting a friend, and I want to log in to my account back home. I trust my friend's machine, but I don't have my home

Folks, I fully understand the emotional need to respond to one who throws around terms like "Communist", "Tyrannical", etc. even if ostensibly framed as a rhetorical question. Certain terms and phrases are by nature pejorative and I;m sure the OP knew this when he entered his post. My feeling was the OP is either an ignorant, unappreciative, self-centered, and emotionally

I am trying to extract significance levels out of a robcov+ols call. For background: I am analysing data where multiple measurements(2 per topic) were taken from individuals(36) on their emotional reaction (dependent variable) to various topics (3 topics). Because I have several emotions and a rotation to do on the topics, I'd like to have the results pumped into a nice table.

On 24/02/2020 15:46, Pete Biggs wrote: >> In many case, but in the situations I'm talking about here is really a >> lot more cumbersome to use. To use the command line to install a a >> package from a website, I have to >> >> 1. Right-click >> 2. Select Save Link As >> 3. Enter filename/directory >> 4. Open a terminal >> 5.

I've posted this before but before it was just wishful thinking. But now it has become a real need. Our boss has a 5 year grudge against Lucent. They had a Lucent here that would simply stop processing calls. No alarms. No nothing. I'm sure that in 5 years, new software has been released. I've got another guy running several AS5400HPX's telling me that you can only do about

Dear rsync: You may ask yourself > How to make people like you and respect you > How to win friends > How to let your conduct help your health, work, job, career, success, relationships, spirit, mind, well-being, ... > How to make your life smoother and happier > How to do whatever you like without being unpleasant to other people

Earlier this year I was lucky enough to have the chance to speak with a very successful businessman at the top of his niche, and I asked him, "Clearly you have a formula for success, what is it?" He told me his secret. He said that every month they pull a name out of a bucket, and that person must then prepare a 20 minute presentation explaining why one of their COMPETITOR'S

Hello, I've got what I'd expect to be a pretty simple issue: I fit an aov object using multiple error strata, and would like some significance tests for the contrasts I specified. In this contrived example, I model some test score as the interaction of a subject's gender and two emotion variables (angry, happy, neutral), measured at entry to the experiment (entry) and later

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 11:53 PM, Peter Lawrence via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Philip, > email responses are varied, some say what you do, but > others say give the guys a chance and listen to what he has to say. > > I say that I have a mild personality disorder such that I can’t say > things in politically correct style, and that this is a

On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 11:11:10AM -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > Just on a side note: I question intelligence of an attitude that something > (that works for some people) has to be destroyed to make room for > something else one thinks to be more appropriate. Let me start by saying I'm also not a fan of Gnome3, and prefer MATE. However, I believe the new interface provided by Gnome3

On 19 September 2013 17:25, Ghassan Shobaki <ghassan_shobaki at yahoo.com>wrote: > Ghassan: You have made me so curious to try other benchmarks in our future > work. Most academic publications on CPU performance though use SPEC. You > can even find some recent publications that are still using SPEC CPU2000! > When I was at AMD in 2009, performance optimization and benchmarking

I’m running into a problem with my application crashing when I make a call to the ov_time_seek() function. The call includes the OggVorbis_File and it is indeed seekable, as I first check that using the ov_seekable() function. Everytime, however I try to seek forward, the application dies with a core dump. I’m working with the example from the “VorbisFile Documentation” site. The application

While rototilling packet.c, I did some looking at cipher_encrypt in cipher.c. It ends up that for SSH_CIPHER_NONE in cipher_encrypt, it uses memcpy. However, it also appears that dest and src can be equal in cipher_encrypt. On most sane libc implementations, memcpy == memmove. However, ANSI C makes no such guarantee, and some implementations out there are bound to try to optimize memcpy

Okay, I've had some fun there. Let me tell I am no samba pro, so the patch below _should be tested and tested again_ in _your_ environment before doing anything close to putting your patched samba into production. It can possibly break everything. You have been warned. The mail is somehow longish, because sending a quick (and dirty) patch without any explanation seems wrong to me. And

OEM software means no CD/DVD, no packing case, no booklets and no overhead cost! So OEM is synonym for lowest price. Buy directly from the manufacturer, pay for software ONLY and save 75-90%! Check discounts and special offers! Find software for home and office! TOP ITEMS Adobe Photoshop CS2 V9.0 $69 Macromedia Flash Prof 8 $49 Adobe Premiere 2.0 $59 MS Office

OEM software means no CD/DVD, no packing case, no booklets and no overhead cost! So OEM is synonym for lowest price. Buy directly from the manufacturer, pay for software ONLY and save 75-90%! Check discounts and special offers! Find software for home and office! TOP ITEMS Adobe Photoshop CS2 V9.0 $69 Macromedia Flash Prof 8 $49 Adobe Premiere 2.0 $59 MS Office

Just a reminder, the Cambridge LLVM Social is this Wednesday, 7:30pm at the The Tivoli, Chesterton Road: http://www.jdwetherspoon.co.uk/home/pubs/the-tivoli This pub is a bit further away from the train station, but has been highly praised by David, so if you don't like it, blame him. If people are interested in coming pre-Christmas, we can try a fancier pub in December (but that might