search for: arcot

...to become "well-established" and "protected by the entire industry" because of some personal, emotional grudge against some group at Stanford, a grudge that, as far as I can tell, may not even be shared by the other OpenSSH developers. Tom -- Tom Wu Principal Software Engineer Arcot Systems (408) 969-6124 "The Borg? Sounds Swedish..."

Hey Everyone!, I just realized we totally failed at putting notices out on mailing lists about Ruby on Ales 2012... oops. Ruby on Ales is a two day single track conference inspired by Ruby, microbrews, and snow. Come listen to great speakers, enjoy the free beer and the amazing company. Just like last year we''re hosting the event in Bend. Ruby on Ales takes place March 1st and 2nd

I just joined the list, and I see in the archives that about a month ago there was a brief discussion of SRP, but it was dismissed. I urge people to take a look at this site: http://srp.stanford.edu/srp/ It's very cool. Let's say I'm on vacation visiting a friend, and I want to log in to my account back home. I trust my friend's machine, but I don't have my home

On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, RJ Atkinson wrote: > At 06:26 27/04/01, Tom Wu wrote: > >For those of you who were following the discussion about the new draft > >and implementation of SRP-based password authentication in OpenSSH, I > >promised to have Stanford issue the IETF an official, explicit, > >statement reiterating the unencumbered royalty-free licensing terms. > >The

>Simply stated, SRP is a strong password authentication protocol that >resists passive/active network attack, and when used in conjunction with >OpenSSH, solves the "unknown host key" problem without requiring host >key fingerprint verification or PKI deployment (e.g. X.509 certs). Put >another way, is there any good reason *not* to fold these patches into >OpenSSH

For those of you who were following the discussion about the new draft and implementation of SRP-based password authentication in OpenSSH, I promised to have Stanford issue the IETF an official, explicit, statement reiterating the unencumbered royalty-free licensing terms. The new statement is now available from the IETF's IPR page. Tom