bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2003-Aug-26 16:56 UTC
[Bug 556] TCP_NODELAY not set completely for port forwarding
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=556 ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2003-08-27 02:56 ------- sshd already sets nodelay for the connection, but conditionally, and only for interactive sessions, so this is the well known problem: why does sshd traditionally set no delay only for interactive sessions. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2003-Aug-26 16:57 UTC
[Bug 556] TCP_NODELAY not set completely for port forwarding
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=556 ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2003-08-27 02:57 ------- i don't see how your patch affects port forwarding...... ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2003-Aug-26 17:12 UTC
[Bug 556] TCP_NODELAY not set completely for port forwarding
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=556 ------- Additional Comments From briang at oasisadvancedengineering.com 2003-08-27 03:12 ------- This patch does not specifically fix port forwarding, as it fixes the problem where TCP_NODELAY is not set on all types of connections. I was using SSH for port forwarding, with a non-interactive connection, and was receiving problems since TCP_NODELAY was not being set. By adding this patch, or something similar, the buffering problem I saw with small but frequent data packets. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [Bug 556] TCP_NODELAY not set completely for port forwarding
- [Bug 556] TCP_NODELAY not set completely for port forwarding
- Use of TCP_NODELAY in commercial SSH
- [Bug 556] TCP_NODELAY not set for non-interactive sessions
- sftp performance problem, cured by TCP_NODELAY