bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2006-Mar-13 08:25 UTC
[Bug 556] TCP_NODELAY not set for non-interactive sessions
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=556
dtucker at zip.com.au changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #294 is|0 |1
obsolete| |
------- Comment #10 from dtucker at zip.com.au 2006-03-13 19:25 -------
Created an attachment (id=1099)
--> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=1099&action=view)
Tidy up patch.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2006-Mar-13 08:28 UTC
[Bug 556] TCP_NODELAY not set for non-interactive sessions
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=556
dtucker at zip.com.au changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
------- Comment #11 from dtucker at zip.com.au 2006-03-13 19:28 -------
Oops, the patch suggested by Markus is also in bug #981 (where it's been
ok'ed)
and covers both this and the client side.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 981 ***
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [Bug 2124] New: TCP_NODELAY not set by sshd for non-interactive non-exec sessions
- [Bug 556] TCP_NODELAY not set completely for port forwarding
- [Bug 556] TCP_NODELAY not set completely for port forwarding
- Upstream forwarding test failure
- TCP_NODELAY always set, now?