Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "briang".
Did you mean:
brian
2003 May 07
4
[Bug 556] TCP_NODELAY not set completely for port forwarding
...ort forwarding
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: sshd
AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org
ReportedBy: briang at oasisadvancedengineering.com
When port forwarding is set up, TCP_NODELAY is set on the ports, in order to prevent buffering. This flag is not set in the actual SSH connection. This causes data that flows from the server to the client to be buffered, causing a bursing effect.
The solution...
2005 Apr 12
7
Samba question
1. Does anyone know what may be happening here? When I try to map a
drive from a PC, I get the following error: "The account is not
authorized to log in from this station.". I can map the drive just fine
from my PC. Does anyone know what may be going on here? Any help would
be greatly appreciated.
2. Also, whenever I use SWAT, it takes a long time for the
information to be
2003 Aug 26
2
[Bug 556] TCP_NODELAY not set completely for port forwarding
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=556
------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2003-08-27 02:56 -------
sshd already sets nodelay for the connection, but conditionally, and
only for interactive sessions, so this is the well known problem:
why does sshd traditionally set no delay only for interactive sessions.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
2006 Mar 12
3
[Bug 981] Flow stop in SSH2
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=981
djm at mindrot.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #811| |ok+
Flag| |
------- Comment #6 from djm at mindrot.org 2006-03-12 16:16 -------
(From update
2003 May 06
0
OpenSSH Bug / Fix
To Whom It May Concern,
Our team has found what we believe to be a bug in the code for SSHD. When
creating an SSH port forward between a Linux machine (server) and a machine running
Cygwin (client), we were getting buffering of data coming from the server. This buffering
caused small ammounts of data to be bursted, instead of sent immediately. Also, since
debug output showed that
2005 Mar 17
0
Re: Last guy to get BV working outbound
Wow, thanks Brian! Everything I saw said the patch was only needed on
older releases. I've updated several times over the last week. I
patched two systems today, one 3/11/05 and one 3/17/05 and now they both
work. Should have posted here sooner!
Brian G.
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 13:28, Brian Buhrow wrote:
> Hello. I'm writing in response to your message to the ASterisk-users
>
2002 Oct 31
1
TCP_NODELAY in Cygwin port
Hello SSH developers,
I am sorry if this is not really a bug, and I am missing something, but I am running into an issue with port forwarding in SSH. I am using 3.4p1 of SSH on both sides.
I am running the ssh daemon on a Slackware Linux 8.0 machine, and the ssh client is running in Cywgin version 1.3.13. The ssh client is creating about 7 port forwards in a mix of local and remote forwarding
2005 Mar 17
1
Last guy to get BV working outbound?
I have tried everything to get BV working outbound. All worked fine
until the BV change last week. I called BV and they changed me to sip
gen with a new password. I stripped my Asterisk server to one phone on
Zap/1 until I get this working. The same BV account works fine with a
SPA-3000 so I don't suspect a firewall problem.
Symptoms: Asterisk registers with BV Ok
Incoming calls work
2005 Mar 28
6
Verizon ISDN
I'm looking to use Asterisk with Verizon ISDN centex service in the US.
I'd be connecting to an NT1 so I'd need an S/T interface. Users would
have SIP phones registered with Asterisk and sharing the ISDN lines.
The only PCI ISDN card that will support ISDN signalling in the US seems
to be the Eicon Diva Server cards. These are hard to find and very
expensive ($2500 for the Quad