Charles Lepple
2016-Nov-01 13:23 UTC
[Nut-upsuser] Questions about Eaton 5E 1, 100W 2, 200VA 6-Outlet UPS
> On Oct 31, 2016, at 10:15 PM, Michael Evans <mjevans1983 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Are there any other tests I can perform or ways that I can help gather data to get the longer tests supported? >The "test.battery.start" command takes a parameter in seconds (defaults to 600): https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/blob/v2.7.4/drivers/nutdrv_qx_blazer-common.c#L286 It is possible that 600 seconds is too long for your model. All of these NUT instant commands get converted to one- or two-character commands to be sent to the UPS: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/blob/v2.7.4/drivers/nutdrv_qx_q1.c#L40 It is probably worth a quick check to see if the vendor software has any documentation on the battery test options. The battery test commands are likely to stop before the battery gets drained too much. You can also use a power strip or circuit breaker to cut the input power to determine runtime.
Michael Evans
2016-Nov-02 01:06 UTC
[Nut-upsuser] Questions about Eaton 5E 1, 100W 2, 200VA 6-Outlet UPS
Thank you for the help. Unfortunately Eaton's website is a nightmare to get concrete data, software, or anything else out of. The reputation for the quality of their components and the compatibility for NUT alone is what white-listed the UPS as a selection option. The source code is enlightening; they're actually controlled/fed back via a bi-directional serial over USB terminal? I honestly don't feel like the knowledge of such a protocol should be a closely guarded secret. However, based on their website, the age of the control chips, and their currently showcased products, I am not hopeful for useful results from searches there or inquiries to product support. After a few more tries of software requests, I ended up switching it off at the breaker panel for a full-depletion test. The ups.load value fluctuated more than I'd prefer during the testing, at one point going well outside of the range I anticipated it to remain within. For the first run: A very rough average reading of "33" (compared to the 60W bulb at "2") lasted under 7 min 40 seconds. I feel like rounding both of those down for safety. The last OB (only) value was 22.20; 90 seconds before the last OB LB was measured. The last, and the second to last reading (30 sec apart) were 21.50 and 21.10. So far these are the 'active' numbers, I need to wait for the battery to recover before performing a lower power test. default.battery.voltage.high = 24.10 default.battery.voltage.low = 21.50 runtimecal = 450,32,?,? I plan to re-test with a load of 8 to 10 (about 300W) since I'm unlikely to have a load much less than that. Alternately, I could test with that 60W bulb... However while the runtimecal recommends picking values that are as far apart as reasonable, I want to target at least one end nearer to the likely load during normal use as I feel that will increase accuracy of estimate during normal use. On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 6:23 AM Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote:> > > On Oct 31, 2016, at 10:15 PM, Michael Evans <mjevans1983 at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Are there any other tests I can perform or ways that I can help gather > data to get the longer tests supported? > > > The "test.battery.start" command takes a parameter in seconds (defaults to > 600): > > > https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/blob/v2.7.4/drivers/nutdrv_qx_blazer-common.c#L286 > > It is possible that 600 seconds is too long for your model. > > All of these NUT instant commands get converted to one- or two-character > commands to be sent to the UPS: > > > https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/blob/v2.7.4/drivers/nutdrv_qx_q1.c#L40 > > It is probably worth a quick check to see if the vendor software has any > documentation on the battery test options. > > The battery test commands are likely to stop before the battery gets > drained too much. You can also use a power strip or circuit breaker to cut > the input power to determine runtime.-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20161102/eba1531d/attachment.html>
Michael Evans
2016-Nov-03 04:48 UTC
[Nut-upsuser] Questions about Eaton 5E 1, 100W 2, 200VA 6-Outlet UPS
This post is to share and ask for confirmation of the accuracy of my thinking in relation to mapping the results of the measurements to the configuration variables provided. While setting up for this latest test I noticed an that the 60W bulb, when combined with 3 power factor correcting PSUs of lower wattage devices, had an effect of '6 units' of power output. This leads me to a more logical conclusion of the percentage actually representing approximately 9-10 watts per percent, but the UPS either having difficulty measuring a more inductive loading or such a low loading. In any event, even though I measured a voltage of 24.40 at the start of the lower power test I'll pick what I guess is the more conservative value seen in the previous test. Similarly a smaller sample period allowed the observation of slightly lower low voltages, which I shall also ignore. After 29 min at approximately 10 units of load (it seemed to flux between a mode average of 10 and 12 depending on which output winding was selected) the incessant beeping stopped. I'll round 1740 down for some additional padding. [eaton5e] driver = nutdrv_qx port = auto vendorid = 06da productid = 0003 default.battery.voltage.high = 24.10 default.battery.voltage.low = 21.50 runtimecal = 450,32,1700,10 However, having just 100% drained (until the UPS shut it's self off) the battery, and having given it only a few min to recharge a bit those settings give an incorrect charge reading. Should the default.battery.voltage.high be the value seen during on-line power conditions (charged up)? Will that have a negative effect on the (safe) accuracy of the remaining runtime? *battery.charge: 100 *battery.voltage: 24.20 battery.voltage.high: 24.10 battery.voltage.low: 21.50 device.type: ups driver.name: nutdrv_qx driver.parameter.pollfreq: 30 driver.parameter.pollinterval: 2 driver.parameter.port: auto driver.parameter.productid: 0003 driver.parameter.runtimecal: 450,32,1700,10 driver.parameter.synchronous: no driver.parameter.vendorid: 06da driver.version: 2.7.4-151-g9209e18 driver.version.data: Q1 0.07 driver.version.internal: 0.28 input.frequency: 60.1 input.voltage: 122.3 input.voltage.fault: 122.0 output.voltage: 122.3 ups.beeper.status: enabled ups.delay.shutdown: 30 ups.delay.start: 180 ups.load: 0 ups.productid: 0003 ups.status: OL ups.type: offline / line interactive ups.vendorid: 06da Thank you in advance for any corrections to my understanding of the documentation. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20161103/56c032fb/attachment.html>
Maybe Matching Threads
- Questions about Eaton 5E 1, 100W 2, 200VA 6-Outlet UPS
- Questions about Eaton 5E 1, 100W 2, 200VA 6-Outlet UPS
- Questions about Eaton 5E 1, 100W 2, 200VA 6-Outlet UPS
- Questions about Eaton 5E 1, 100W 2, 200VA 6-Outlet UPS
- Questions about Eaton 5E 1, 100W 2, 200VA 6-Outlet UPS