Shade Alabsa
2014-Mar-26 00:35 UTC
[Nut-upsuser] Configuring APC Smart-UPS 2200 on two computers
Charles and Tim - I actually had 192.168.123.1 3493 initially since that's what I thought was correct but it didn't work - don't remember the exact error and I'm not near the hardware right now to check it. I don't believe I checked 0.0.0.0 3493. I will try both again when I get a chance and reply with a better update. Thanks for the quick reply! Shade On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Tim Dawson <tadawson at tpcsvc.com> wrote:> No "LISTEN" entry on 192.168.123.1 for anything other than 127.0.0.1 . . > . So connection refused is the correct response under those conditions. > > - Tim > > On March 25, 2014 6:39:32 PM CDT, Shade Alabsa <shade34321 at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I have a dual controller box similar to this - >> >> http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/3U/6037/SSG-6037B-DE2R16L.cfm >> >> On one controller I have Nut configured and working as a server. On the >> other side I'm trying to configure Nut as a slave to query the other side >> and for some reason it's not working. I'm getting this error: >> "Error: Connection failure: Connection refused" >> >> I'm running with the following set up >> OS - CentOS 6.4 >> Nut - 2.6.5-2el6.x86_64 >> http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/x86_64/repoview/nut.html >> Nut client - nut-client-2.6.5-2.el6.x86_64 >> http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/x86_64/repoview/nut-client.html >> UPS - APC Smart-ups 2200 >> >> I installed both nut packages via RPM's taken from the links above. I >> have a pastebin link below with all the configurations. I only added in the >> lines that weren't commented out. Also if there is only a config file >> listed for 192.168.123.1 but not one listed for 192.168.123.3 it is because >> 192.168.123.3 has the exact config file. I also do not have iptables or >> selinux running. I also have this same exact set up running on Fedora 11 >> and nut package 2-4.1-12.fc11.x86_64 so I'm not sure what the difference >> is. >> >> 192.168.123.1 is the master and is the controller directly connected to >> the UPS >> 192.168.123.3 is the slave and is the controller that I want to poll >> 192.168.123.1 for information. >> >> >> http://pastebin.com/dGgKEBDH >> >> I feel like it's a stupid configuration issue that I've missed so >> hopefully somebody can point it out for me. Thanks! >> >> Shade >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Nut-upsuser mailing list >> Nut-upsuser at lists.alioth.debian.org >> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser >> >> > > --- > Tim Dawson > Lewisville, TX > > "Gaff tape can't fix "Stupid", but it can muffle the sound . . ." > Sent via Android >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20140325/7e127dab/attachment.html>