search for: smart

Hello, My machine is running Software RAID 5 on /dev/hde1, /dev/hdg1,/dev/hdi1. I noticed on the log that suddenly we are getting messages such as : Oct 14 01:27:16 localhost smartd[4801]: Device: /dev/hde, SMART Prefailure Attribute: 8 Seek_Time_Performance changed from 247 to 246 Oct 14 01:57:15 localhost smartd[4801]: Device: /dev/hde, SMART Prefailure Attribute: 8 Seek_Time_Performance changed from 246 to 245 Oct 14 02:27:15 localhost smartd[4801]: Device: /dev/hde, S...

.../server -e production -p 3001" error: => Booting WEBrick => Rails 2.3.4 application starting on http://0.0.0.0:3001 config.gem: Unpacked gem rack-rewrite-1.2.1 in vendor/gems has no specification file. Run ''rake gems:refresh_specs'' to fix this. /home/bacancy/Demo_app/smart/vendor/radiant/vendor/rails/railties/lib/rails/gem_dependency.rb:119:Warning: Gem::Dependency#version_requirements is deprecated and will be removed on or after August 2010. Use #requirement /home/bacancy/Demo_app/smart/vendor/radiant/vendor/rails/activerecord/lib/active_record/base.rb:1959:in...

Hi, On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 12:07 +0200, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === > SMART Error Log not supported I reckon there's a <snip> between those lines. The line right after the first should read something like: SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED or "FAILED" for that matter. If not try running smartctl -t...

My wife's box has a very intermittent problem, when booting from the Maxtor IDE hard drive. This has been going on for about 2 1/2 years.... The box is a Compaq EVO D300v for the Enterprise. When it boots, there is a SMART advisory from the BIOS that says failure is immenient. Occasionally, it will not boot, because the BIOS does not see the hard drive. I replaced the EIDE cable, but the problem of sometimes not seeing the hard drive on boot continues. I suspect it has to do with something loose in the electronics...

On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:25, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > Il 24/10/2016 14:05, Leonard den Ottolander ha scritto: >> On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 12:07 +0200, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >> > === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === >> > SMART Error Log not supported >> >> I reckon there's a <snip> between those lines. The line right after the >> first should read something like: >> >> SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED >> >&gt...

Okay, this *should* be easy, but it isn''t, although I reserve the right to smack myself upside the head if it is: Assume that a smart has_many ratings, and a rating belongs_to a smart (the models are fine). Each rating has a column smart_id. Each smart, then, has many ratings, with a column called "rating" that is an int (1-10). I want to find, say, the ten smarts with the highest average rating. Calculating an av...

Il 24/10/2016 14:05, Leonard den Ottolander ha scritto: > Hi, > > On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 12:07 +0200, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >> === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === >> SMART Error Log not supported > > I reckon there's a <snip> between those lines. The line right after the > first should read something like: > > SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED > > or "FAILED" for that matt...

There seems to be some uncertainty about the use of smart pointers (previously OwningPtr, now std::unique_ptr and std::shared_ptr predominantly) in the LLVM project as a whole, so here's a thread to discuss/clarify/etc the project preferences/direction with regard to smart pointer usage. For some context, see discussions in LLVM r212403 and Clang r21...

Il 27/10/2016 19:38, Yamaban ha scritto: > On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:25, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >> Il 24/10/2016 14:05, Leonard den Ottolander ha scritto: >>> On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 12:07 +0200, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >>> > === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === >>> > SMART Error Log not supported >>> >>> I reckon there's a <snip> between those lines. The line right after the >>> first should read something like: >>> >>> SMART overall-health self-assessment test result:...

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Alp Toker <alp at nuanti.com> wrote: > > On 18/07/2014 02:21, David Blaikie wrote: >> >> Are people OK with/prefer the use of owning smart pointers in APIs? > > > I think smart pointers are great to use for storage, or as struct members > where there's actually a clear need for ownership. Just by virtue of getting > rid of destructors containing single delete expressions this is already a > win. Great! > In...

Hi All, I'm trying to configure NUT 2.6.1 on Windows 2008 R2 to recognise two APC Smart-UPS 3000 devices connected via USB cables. I have correctly installed libusb-win32, and run the driver wizard. In my ups.conf I have :- [Upper] driver = usbhid-ups port = auto desc = "Upper Smart-UPS 3000" vendorid = 051d serial = "JS1011030553&q...

...#39;ve posted before with no success on getting this fixed. I was getting these errors. Dec 4 04:03:10 bikesn4x4s kernel: hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } Dec 4 04:03:10 bikesn4x4s kernel: hda: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC } And now for the amazing smartctl -a command. The output actually had a link that advised and directed me to a link to upgrade my firmware, which looks to have fixed it. Simply amazing. smartctl -a /dev/hda: smartctl version 5.33 [i686-redhat-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-4 Bruce Allen Home page is http://smartmontools.sourc...

...ternal hard drive was bad, and the optical drive is going bad. I had an old 80 GB Seagate and the optical drive was good enough to boot the boot.iso and do a network install, so I put CentOS 5.4 on it. It is working extremely well as a small headless server, but my Seagate drive has given some SMART errors. This is a drive that has been out of service for several years, I had 60GB worth of flac files on it, and had no trouble getting them off before formatting (and all matched their md5sum). It appears all the errors happen at boot - IE Error 10 occurred at disk power-on lifetime: 1248 ho...

Hi there, I am using an old (really old) APC Smart-UPS 600. It worked fine under apcupsd but when I tried NUT it did not work. The error I was getting was: sudo /lib/nut/apcsmart -DDD /dev/ttyS1 Network UPS Tools (version 2.0.4) - APC Smart protocol driver Driver version 1.99.8, command table version 2.0 debug level is '3' Attempt...

Hello, I am struggling with a problem which I thought would be an easy one : bridging several channels together in a *smart* bridge. I emphasize *smart* : I want my bridge to be a native_rtp one when only two channels are involved, and switch to softmix technology when a third channel comes in. I thought I could use ConfBridge for that, but it creates a bridge that is not smart (it is of type softmix even if two ch...

Hi, The patch below adds support for a pair of old (circa 1993) APC Smart-UPS 600 devices that I have. They don't support the query mechanism of newer APC devices but do respond to the full Smart-UPS command set: battery.alarm.threshold: 0 battery.charge: 100.0 battery.charge.restart: 00 battery.date: 02/22/93 battery.runtime: 2040 battery.runtime.low: 120 battery.v...

I'm not used to using smartd, but have a new set of systems that don't have any sort of RAID on them, so I enabled smartd (18 systems 4 SATA drives each). Running CentOS 5.4 64-bit .. One of them has emailed me twice(despite it saying it would only email me once) saying it has 1 Offline uncorrectable sectors But when...

On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Jordan Rose <jordan_rose at apple.com> wrote: > I don't have much to add here besides +1. I think using std::unique_ptr > even for create* functions/methods is the right way to go. +1 smart pointers here are a win in terms of safety and self-documentation. I don't see why create* factories should be treated differently. Eli > Reid's point about an abstraction penalty is interesting, but I don't > think we do ownership transfers often enough to actually see a per...

...39; and it only did less than 2% in that time. Read access became _really_ slow. So there's definitely something amiss and I've got it offline. There's no drama about the content as I have other backups and I'm resigned to junking the thing, but I'm curious about the fact that smartctl doesn't seem to report any errors. I tried a short and a long test but nothing in there seems to be alarming - in fact it says PASSED!! - but the output is pretty opaque and maybe I've been foxed by ambiguity. Anyone care to comment on it? Here it is: [root at nina bhepple]# smartctl /...

Hello, SMART error (OfflineUncorrectableSector) detected on host: *************************************************************************** The following warning/error was logged by the smartd daemon: Device: /dev/hdb, 2 Offline uncorrectable sectors For details see host's SYSLOG (default: /var/log/messag...