David H. Durgee
2012-Dec-04 18:17 UTC
[Nut-upsuser] Does NUT include support for older UPSD servers?
I have a network with two older systems protected by APC UPSs. Both systems run OS/2 and will continue to do so. Both systems have APC PowerChute Plus 4.2.3 installed and I can use that software to monitor and control both systems. I am also now running several linux systems, in fact I spend almost all my time on the linux systems and these OS/2 systems are servers running in the background which need to be protected. Thus I would like to be able to monitor the UPSs connected to the OS/2 systems from a linux system. Unfortunately that appears to be problematic. The PCP 4.x software appears to use Lan Server for its network protocol while the later APC software uses TCP/IP for networking. The Windows/WfWG version of 4.x lacks network support. The linux version of 4.x is not binary compatible with modern linux systems and is closed source. I have posted on the APC forums and they have had nothing further to suggest to me other than to check third-party software or run the OS/2 software in a virtual machine. Given this, I am posting this to ask if there is backward compatibility in your package that would permit me to monitor my UPSs connected via the OS/2 UPSD 4.2.3 software. If not, I guess I will need to look elsewhere. Dave
Charles Lepple
2012-Dec-05 14:07 UTC
[Nut-upsuser] Does NUT include support for older UPSD servers?
On Dec 4, 2012, at 1:17 PM, David H. Durgee wrote:> I have a network with two older systems protected by APC UPSs. Both systems run OS/2 and will continue to do so. Both systems have APC PowerChute Plus 4.2.3 installed and I can use that software to monitor and control both systems. > > I am also now running several linux systems, in fact I spend almost all my time on the linux systems and these OS/2 systems are servers running in the background which need to be protected. Thus I would like to be able to monitor the UPSs connected to the OS/2 systems from a linux system. Unfortunately that appears to be problematic. The PCP 4.x software appears to use Lan Server for its network protocol while the later APC software uses TCP/IP for networking. The Windows/WfWG version of 4.x lacks network support. The linux version of 4.x is not binary compatible with modern linux systems and is closed source.So if I understand correctly, it is not possible to run the later PowerChute Plus software (that supports TCP/IP) on the OS/2 systems?> I have posted on the APC forums and they have had nothing further to suggest to me other than to check third-party software or run the OS/2 software in a virtual machine. Given this, I am posting this to ask if there is backward compatibility in your package that would permit me to monitor my UPSs connected via the OS/2 UPSD 4.2.3 software. If not, I guess I will need to look elsewhere.I don't think NUT has support for talking to PowerChute (unless it is hiding under a different name), but if we were to develop something for it, we would probably only target the TCP/IP interface. If it is possible to get the OS/2 boxes to speak the PowerChute protocol over TCP, you might have some success with apcupsd: http://old.nabble.com/APC-PowerChute-Network-Protocol-to5424978.html http://www.apcupsd.com/manual/manual.html#powerchute-network-shutdown-driver-pcnet This is all speculation, however. -- Charles Lepple clepple at gmail
David H. Durgee
2012-Dec-07 16:51 UTC
[Nut-upsuser] Does NUT include support for older UPSD servers?
I have obtained a copy of NUT-2.4.3 for OS/2 port from the restricted server. Unfortunately I found on inspection that it does not include all the drivers and is missing apcsmart in particular. I have posted a request to the guy who ported it to see if he could port that driver as well, but I have not heard from him about this yet. The port was also done back in June, 2010, so there is also a question about recreating the build environment at this point. Given the time passed it might make more sense from his point of view to port the current version instead. Hopefully I will hear from him in a few days, but given this is close to the Christmas holiday it is possible it might be a while. Dave