Maarten Maathuis
2010-Feb-07 01:11 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau: don't hold spin lock while calling kzalloc with GFP_KERNEL
- 'joi' on irc pointed out that this triggers a BUG_ON, because kzalloc could sleep. - The irq handler should restore the value NV03_PFIFO_CACHES, but still it's better if this stuff doesn't happen in the middle of fifo create context. I see no reason in spin locking pgraph create context, it isn't activated at that stage. - Move and rename the lock after some discussion with 'joi', even better naming suggestions are appreciated. Signed-off-by: Maarten Maathuis <madman2003 at gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_channel.c | 9 ++------- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h | 4 +++- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_irq.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fifo.c | 5 +++++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_fifo.c | 5 +++++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_fifo.c | 4 ++++ 7 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_channel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_channel.c index d25ed61..f7ca950 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_channel.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_channel.c @@ -113,7 +113,6 @@ nouveau_channel_alloc(struct drm_device *dev, struct nouveau_channel **chan_ret, struct nouveau_pgraph_engine *pgraph = &dev_priv->engine.graph; struct nouveau_fifo_engine *pfifo = &dev_priv->engine.fifo; struct nouveau_channel *chan; - unsigned long flags; int channel, user; int ret; @@ -204,8 +203,6 @@ nouveau_channel_alloc(struct drm_device *dev, struct nouveau_channel **chan_ret, return ret; } - spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->engine.lock, flags); - /* disable the fifo caches */ pfifo->reassign(dev, false); @@ -225,8 +222,6 @@ nouveau_channel_alloc(struct drm_device *dev, struct nouveau_channel **chan_ret, pfifo->reassign(dev, true); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->engine.lock, flags); - ret = nouveau_dma_init(chan); if (!ret) ret = nouveau_fence_init(chan); @@ -290,7 +285,7 @@ nouveau_channel_free(struct nouveau_channel *chan) if (pgraph->channel(dev) == chan) nouveau_wait_for_idle(dev); - spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->engine.lock, flags); + spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->context_switch_lock, flags); pgraph->fifo_access(dev, false); if (pgraph->channel(dev) == chan) @@ -307,7 +302,7 @@ nouveau_channel_free(struct nouveau_channel *chan) pfifo->reassign(dev, true); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->engine.lock, flags); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->context_switch_lock, flags); /* Release the channel's resources */ nouveau_gpuobj_ref_del(dev, &chan->pushbuf); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h index 64987a9..ea55a41 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h @@ -358,7 +358,6 @@ struct nouveau_engine { struct nouveau_fb_engine fb; struct nouveau_pgraph_engine graph; struct nouveau_fifo_engine fifo; - spinlock_t lock; }; struct nouveau_pll_vals { @@ -534,6 +533,9 @@ struct drm_nouveau_private { struct nouveau_engine engine; struct nouveau_channel *channel; + /* For PFIFO and PGRAPH. */ + spinlock_t context_switch_lock; + /* RAMIN configuration, RAMFC, RAMHT and RAMRO offsets */ struct nouveau_gpuobj *ramht; uint32_t ramin_rsvd_vram; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_irq.c index cffc9bc..95220dd 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_irq.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_irq.c @@ -697,7 +697,7 @@ nouveau_irq_handler(DRM_IRQ_ARGS) if (!status) return IRQ_NONE; - spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->engine.lock, flags); + spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->context_switch_lock, flags); if (dev_priv->fbdev_info) { fbdev_flags = dev_priv->fbdev_info->flags; @@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ nouveau_irq_handler(DRM_IRQ_ARGS) if (dev_priv->fbdev_info) dev_priv->fbdev_info->flags = fbdev_flags; - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->engine.lock, flags); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->context_switch_lock, flags); return IRQ_HANDLED; } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c index 3586667..0a2a437 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c @@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ nouveau_card_init(struct drm_device *dev) goto out; engine = &dev_priv->engine; dev_priv->init_state = NOUVEAU_CARD_INIT_FAILED; - spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->engine.lock); + spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->context_switch_lock); /* Parse BIOS tables / Run init tables if card not POSTed */ if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) { diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fifo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fifo.c index f31347b..66fe559 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fifo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fifo.c @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ nv04_fifo_create_context(struct nouveau_channel *chan) { struct drm_device *dev = chan->dev; struct drm_nouveau_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; + unsigned long flags; int ret; ret = nouveau_gpuobj_new_fake(dev, NV04_RAMFC(chan->id), ~0, @@ -127,6 +128,8 @@ nv04_fifo_create_context(struct nouveau_channel *chan) if (ret) return ret; + spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->context_switch_lock, flags); + /* Setup initial state */ dev_priv->engine.instmem.prepare_access(dev, true); RAMFC_WR(DMA_PUT, chan->pushbuf_base); @@ -144,6 +147,8 @@ nv04_fifo_create_context(struct nouveau_channel *chan) /* enable the fifo dma operation */ nv_wr32(dev, NV04_PFIFO_MODE, nv_rd32(dev, NV04_PFIFO_MODE) | (1 << chan->id)); + + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->context_switch_lock, flags); return 0; } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_fifo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_fifo.c index b4f19cc..6b2ef4a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_fifo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_fifo.c @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ nv40_fifo_create_context(struct nouveau_channel *chan) struct drm_device *dev = chan->dev; struct drm_nouveau_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; uint32_t fc = NV40_RAMFC(chan->id); + unsigned long flags; int ret; ret = nouveau_gpuobj_new_fake(dev, NV40_RAMFC(chan->id), ~0, @@ -45,6 +46,8 @@ nv40_fifo_create_context(struct nouveau_channel *chan) if (ret) return ret; + spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->context_switch_lock, flags); + dev_priv->engine.instmem.prepare_access(dev, true); nv_wi32(dev, fc + 0, chan->pushbuf_base); nv_wi32(dev, fc + 4, chan->pushbuf_base); @@ -63,6 +66,8 @@ nv40_fifo_create_context(struct nouveau_channel *chan) /* enable the fifo dma operation */ nv_wr32(dev, NV04_PFIFO_MODE, nv_rd32(dev, NV04_PFIFO_MODE) | (1 << chan->id)); + + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->context_switch_lock, flags); return 0; } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_fifo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_fifo.c index 204a79f..983e43b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_fifo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_fifo.c @@ -243,6 +243,7 @@ nv50_fifo_create_context(struct nouveau_channel *chan) struct drm_device *dev = chan->dev; struct drm_nouveau_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; struct nouveau_gpuobj *ramfc = NULL; + unsigned long flags; int ret; NV_DEBUG(dev, "ch%d\n", chan->id); @@ -278,6 +279,8 @@ nv50_fifo_create_context(struct nouveau_channel *chan) return ret; } + spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->context_switch_lock, flags); + dev_priv->engine.instmem.prepare_access(dev, true); nv_wo32(dev, ramfc, 0x08/4, chan->pushbuf_base); @@ -310,6 +313,7 @@ nv50_fifo_create_context(struct nouveau_channel *chan) return ret; } + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->context_switch_lock, flags); return 0; } -- 1.6.6.1
Marcin Slusarz
2010-Feb-07 09:54 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau: don't hold spin lock while calling kzalloc with GFP_KERNEL
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 02:11:20AM +0100, Maarten Maathuis wrote:> - 'joi' on irc pointed out that this triggers a BUG_ON, because kzalloc could > sleep. > - The irq handler should restore the value NV03_PFIFO_CACHES, but still it's > better if this stuff doesn't happen in the middle of fifo create context. I see > no reason in spin locking pgraph create context, it isn't activated at that > stage. > - Move and rename the lock after some discussion with 'joi', even better naming > suggestions are appreciated. > > Signed-off-by: Maarten Maathuis <madman2003 at gmail.com>(joi==/me) Tested-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz at gmail.com>
Pekka Paalanen
2010-Feb-08 10:30 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau: don't hold spin lock while calling kzalloc with GFP_KERNEL
On Sun, 7 Feb 2010 02:11:20 +0100 Maarten Maathuis <madman2003 at gmail.com> wrote:> - 'joi' on irc pointed out that this triggers a BUG_ON, because > kzalloc could sleep. > - The irq handler should restore the value NV03_PFIFO_CACHES, but > still it's better if this stuff doesn't happen in the middle of > fifo create context. I see no reason in spin locking pgraph > create context, it isn't activated at that stage. > - Move and rename the lock after some discussion with 'joi', even > better naming suggestions are appreciated. > > Signed-off-by: Maarten Maathuis <madman2003 at gmail.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_channel.c | 9 ++------- > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h | 4 +++- > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_irq.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fifo.c | 5 +++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_fifo.c | 5 +++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_fifo.c | 4 ++++ > 7 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)<...>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_fifo.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_fifo.c index 204a79f..983e43b > 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_fifo.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_fifo.c > @@ -243,6 +243,7 @@ nv50_fifo_create_context(struct > nouveau_channel *chan) struct drm_device *dev = chan->dev; > struct drm_nouveau_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > struct nouveau_gpuobj *ramfc = NULL; > + unsigned long flags; > int ret; > > NV_DEBUG(dev, "ch%d\n", chan->id); > @@ -278,6 +279,8 @@ nv50_fifo_create_context(struct > nouveau_channel *chan) return ret; > } > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->context_switch_lock, flags); > + > dev_priv->engine.instmem.prepare_access(dev, true); > > nv_wo32(dev, ramfc, 0x08/4, chan->pushbuf_base); > @@ -310,6 +313,7 @@ nv50_fifo_create_context(struct > nouveau_channel *chan) return ret; > } > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->context_switch_lock, > flags); return 0; > }After this patch, sparse complains: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_fifo.c:241:1: warning: context imbalance in 'nv50_fifo_create_context' - different lock contexts for basic block Near the end of the function, the failure exit path does not unlock the spinlock. Btw. before this patch nouveau_channel_alloc() contains two cases of failure path not releasing the spinlock, plus, under the spinlock, a call to a function that re-locks the spinlock, hence hangs. Sparse does warn about exiting a function without releasing a spinlock in every path, i.e., inconsistent lock behaviour. Thanks. -- Pekka Paalanen http://www.iki.fi/pq/
Maarten Maathuis
2010-Feb-08 17:38 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau: don't hold spin lock while calling kzalloc with GFP_KERNEL
- Marcin Slusarz pointed out that this triggers a BUG_ON, because kzalloc could sleep. - The irq handler should restore the value NV03_PFIFO_CACHES, but still it's better if this stuff doesn't happen in the middle of fifo create context. I see no reason in spin locking pgraph create context, it isn't activated at that stage. - Move and rename the lock after some discussion with Marcin, even better naming suggestions are appreciated. Tested-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz at gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Maarten Maathuis <madman2003 at gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_channel.c | 9 ++------- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h | 4 +++- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_irq.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fifo.c | 5 +++++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_fifo.c | 5 +++++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_fifo.c | 5 +++++ 7 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_channel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_channel.c index d25ed61..f7ca950 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_channel.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_channel.c @@ -113,7 +113,6 @@ nouveau_channel_alloc(struct drm_device *dev, struct nouveau_channel **chan_ret, struct nouveau_pgraph_engine *pgraph = &dev_priv->engine.graph; struct nouveau_fifo_engine *pfifo = &dev_priv->engine.fifo; struct nouveau_channel *chan; - unsigned long flags; int channel, user; int ret; @@ -204,8 +203,6 @@ nouveau_channel_alloc(struct drm_device *dev, struct nouveau_channel **chan_ret, return ret; } - spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->engine.lock, flags); - /* disable the fifo caches */ pfifo->reassign(dev, false); @@ -225,8 +222,6 @@ nouveau_channel_alloc(struct drm_device *dev, struct nouveau_channel **chan_ret, pfifo->reassign(dev, true); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->engine.lock, flags); - ret = nouveau_dma_init(chan); if (!ret) ret = nouveau_fence_init(chan); @@ -290,7 +285,7 @@ nouveau_channel_free(struct nouveau_channel *chan) if (pgraph->channel(dev) == chan) nouveau_wait_for_idle(dev); - spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->engine.lock, flags); + spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->context_switch_lock, flags); pgraph->fifo_access(dev, false); if (pgraph->channel(dev) == chan) @@ -307,7 +302,7 @@ nouveau_channel_free(struct nouveau_channel *chan) pfifo->reassign(dev, true); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->engine.lock, flags); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->context_switch_lock, flags); /* Release the channel's resources */ nouveau_gpuobj_ref_del(dev, &chan->pushbuf); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h index 64987a9..ea55a41 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h @@ -358,7 +358,6 @@ struct nouveau_engine { struct nouveau_fb_engine fb; struct nouveau_pgraph_engine graph; struct nouveau_fifo_engine fifo; - spinlock_t lock; }; struct nouveau_pll_vals { @@ -534,6 +533,9 @@ struct drm_nouveau_private { struct nouveau_engine engine; struct nouveau_channel *channel; + /* For PFIFO and PGRAPH. */ + spinlock_t context_switch_lock; + /* RAMIN configuration, RAMFC, RAMHT and RAMRO offsets */ struct nouveau_gpuobj *ramht; uint32_t ramin_rsvd_vram; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_irq.c index cffc9bc..95220dd 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_irq.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_irq.c @@ -697,7 +697,7 @@ nouveau_irq_handler(DRM_IRQ_ARGS) if (!status) return IRQ_NONE; - spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->engine.lock, flags); + spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->context_switch_lock, flags); if (dev_priv->fbdev_info) { fbdev_flags = dev_priv->fbdev_info->flags; @@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ nouveau_irq_handler(DRM_IRQ_ARGS) if (dev_priv->fbdev_info) dev_priv->fbdev_info->flags = fbdev_flags; - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->engine.lock, flags); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->context_switch_lock, flags); return IRQ_HANDLED; } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c index 3586667..0a2a437 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c @@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ nouveau_card_init(struct drm_device *dev) goto out; engine = &dev_priv->engine; dev_priv->init_state = NOUVEAU_CARD_INIT_FAILED; - spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->engine.lock); + spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->context_switch_lock); /* Parse BIOS tables / Run init tables if card not POSTed */ if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) { diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fifo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fifo.c index f31347b..66fe559 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fifo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fifo.c @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ nv04_fifo_create_context(struct nouveau_channel *chan) { struct drm_device *dev = chan->dev; struct drm_nouveau_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; + unsigned long flags; int ret; ret = nouveau_gpuobj_new_fake(dev, NV04_RAMFC(chan->id), ~0, @@ -127,6 +128,8 @@ nv04_fifo_create_context(struct nouveau_channel *chan) if (ret) return ret; + spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->context_switch_lock, flags); + /* Setup initial state */ dev_priv->engine.instmem.prepare_access(dev, true); RAMFC_WR(DMA_PUT, chan->pushbuf_base); @@ -144,6 +147,8 @@ nv04_fifo_create_context(struct nouveau_channel *chan) /* enable the fifo dma operation */ nv_wr32(dev, NV04_PFIFO_MODE, nv_rd32(dev, NV04_PFIFO_MODE) | (1 << chan->id)); + + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->context_switch_lock, flags); return 0; } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_fifo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_fifo.c index b4f19cc..6b2ef4a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_fifo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_fifo.c @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ nv40_fifo_create_context(struct nouveau_channel *chan) struct drm_device *dev = chan->dev; struct drm_nouveau_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; uint32_t fc = NV40_RAMFC(chan->id); + unsigned long flags; int ret; ret = nouveau_gpuobj_new_fake(dev, NV40_RAMFC(chan->id), ~0, @@ -45,6 +46,8 @@ nv40_fifo_create_context(struct nouveau_channel *chan) if (ret) return ret; + spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->context_switch_lock, flags); + dev_priv->engine.instmem.prepare_access(dev, true); nv_wi32(dev, fc + 0, chan->pushbuf_base); nv_wi32(dev, fc + 4, chan->pushbuf_base); @@ -63,6 +66,8 @@ nv40_fifo_create_context(struct nouveau_channel *chan) /* enable the fifo dma operation */ nv_wr32(dev, NV04_PFIFO_MODE, nv_rd32(dev, NV04_PFIFO_MODE) | (1 << chan->id)); + + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->context_switch_lock, flags); return 0; } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_fifo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_fifo.c index 204a79f..369ecb4 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_fifo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_fifo.c @@ -243,6 +243,7 @@ nv50_fifo_create_context(struct nouveau_channel *chan) struct drm_device *dev = chan->dev; struct drm_nouveau_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; struct nouveau_gpuobj *ramfc = NULL; + unsigned long flags; int ret; NV_DEBUG(dev, "ch%d\n", chan->id); @@ -278,6 +279,8 @@ nv50_fifo_create_context(struct nouveau_channel *chan) return ret; } + spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->context_switch_lock, flags); + dev_priv->engine.instmem.prepare_access(dev, true); nv_wo32(dev, ramfc, 0x08/4, chan->pushbuf_base); @@ -306,10 +309,12 @@ nv50_fifo_create_context(struct nouveau_channel *chan) ret = nv50_fifo_channel_enable(dev, chan->id, false); if (ret) { NV_ERROR(dev, "error enabling ch%d: %d\n", chan->id, ret); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->context_switch_lock, flags); nouveau_gpuobj_ref_del(dev, &chan->ramfc); return ret; } + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->context_switch_lock, flags); return 0; } -- 1.6.6.1
Possibly Parallel Threads
- deadlock possiblity introduced by "drm/nouveau: use drm_mm in preference to custom code doing the same thing"
- [PATCH 1/2] drm/nv50: Make ctxprog wait until interrupt handler is done.
- [PATCH 1/6] drm/nv50: align size of buffer object to the right boundaries.
- [PATCH] drm/nouveau: Acknowledge DMA_VTX_PROTECTION PGRAPH interrupts
- git - compile error ratelimit - missing include <linux/ratelimit.h>