bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.netfilter.org
2006-May-11 17:52 UTC
[Bug 474] nf_conntrack marks all packets as INVALID on sparc64 (probably endianness bug)
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=474 jan.oravec@6com.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OS/Version|All |Gentoo Platform|All |sparc64 ------- Additional Comments From jan.oravec@6com.sk 2006-05-11 17:52 MET ------- setting hardware/os -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.netfilter.org
2006-May-11 19:10 UTC
[Bug 474] nf_conntrack marks all packets as INVALID on sparc64 (probably endianness bug)
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=474 ------- Additional Comments From gandalf@netfilter.org 2006-05-11 19:10 MET ------- Is the nf_conntrack_ipv4 module loaded? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.netfilter.org
2006-May-11 19:12 UTC
[Bug 474] nf_conntrack marks all packets as INVALID on sparc64 (probably endianness bug)
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=474 ------- Additional Comments From gandalf@netfilter.org 2006-05-11 19:10 MET ------- Is the nf_conntrack_ipv4 module loaded? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.netfilter.org
2006-May-11 19:35 UTC
[Bug 474] nf_conntrack marks all packets as INVALID on sparc64 (probably endianness bug)
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=474 jan.oravec@6com.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From jan.oravec@6com.sk 2006-05-11 19:35 MET ------- oh, my fault, sorry for the invalid report previous machines had it compiled into the kernel but still, i would expect the iptables write an error message when using connection tracking in $proto table and nf_conntrack_$proto is not loaded -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.netfilter.org
2006-May-12 00:44 UTC
[Bug 474] nf_conntrack marks all packets as INVALID on sparc64 (probably endianness bug)
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=474 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-05-12 00:44 MET ------- Starting with 2.6.17-rc it will report an error if you use the state match and it can't load the module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.netfilter.org
2006-May-12 00:45 UTC
[Bug 474] nf_conntrack marks all packets as INVALID on sparc64 (probably endianness bug)
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=474 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-05-12 00:44 MET ------- Starting with 2.6.17-rc it will report an error if you use the state match and it can't load the module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [Bug 474] New: nf_conntrack marks all packets as INVALID on sparc64 (probably endianness bug)
- Xen S3 host resume: "Interrupts enabled after xen_acpi_processor_resume+0x0/0x34"
- [Bug 726] New: Oops in nf_conntrack.
- [Bug 94] Limit match not working on sparc64
- [Bug 1] wrong packet/byte counters on sparc64