bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.netfilter.org
2004-Sep-21 00:48 UTC
[Bug 1] wrong packet/byte counters on sparc64
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED OS/Version| |All Platform| |All Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2004-09-21 00:48 CEST ------- Martin Josefsson reported in bug #94 that with his 64bit kernel/32bit userspace patches now merged, this problem should be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.netfilter.org
2004-Sep-21 08:11 UTC
[Bug 1] wrong packet/byte counters on sparc64
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1 gandalf@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | ------- Additional Comments From gandalf@netfilter.org 2004-09-21 08:11 CEST ------- In bug 94 I state that the limit match should be working on 32/64 bit machines. I havn't looked at this problem yet since it appeared to work (possible because of the netfilter code in sparc64). Further, I believe the compat ioctl() code of all architectures in 2.6 now has been merged into one common codebase and that the netfilter "fix" is included in that. Needs to be verified. Reopening bug so we don't forget to verify. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Maybe Matching Threads
- [Bug 36] Possible SMP-race in rule handling (or other memorycorrupting thing)
- [Bug 474] nf_conntrack marks all packets as INVALID on sparc64 (probably endianness bug)
- [Bug 808] New: Wrong packet and byte counters when using DROP/REJECT targets and UDP protocol match
- [Bridge] bridge at start up
- [Bug 339] Kernel panic on bridged packet