search for: packets

What might be causing this error? I see it once in 2-3 days and it goes away when I restart backgroundrb. Quoted below is my backgroundrb_server_11007.log file. Can I do anything to avoid this? Thanks, Raghu ================================================================================== /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/monitor.rb:224:in `mon_exit'': stack level too deep (SystemStackError) from

Hi, I''m brand new to BackgrounDRb and trying to figure out the setup. I cloned the git repository today as listed on the BackgrounDRb website. Starting out with a very basic worker, but BackgroundDRb is crashing on a NameError. Any help to resolve this issue would be greatly appreciated! Thank you in advance!! I am also attaching a text file with the output below since it might be

Found an error or two from my logwatch report from yesterday, thought I would share this in hopes this is just first time run of the problem I noticed in the Kernel report section... Also not sure why there's an issue with automount either.... but I guess I could ask on that issue as well. I am not worried about the NAMED error, this is something that happens due to one of the services that

Hello, I''ve been using backgroundrb successfully for months now, but suddenly I''m getting the error below when trying to start it up. I did some searching and I see that someone posted about it last month: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/backgroundrb-devel/2008-April/001685.html Anyone have any idea what could have happened? I made no changes to the code or configs, but I did

Hello! I have encountered a bug using tincd with Microsoft Windows: Below you'll find my Setup and my Logs. In short, i do the following: 1. office running tincd 1.0.7 and waiting for connections (no ConnectTo, but this does not resolve the issue) 2. the supporter starts up tincd 1.0.7 on windows (native) 3. ping from windows ("support") to the office: Here the error occours:

Hi! I have two identical SIP accounts on Asterisk 1.4.22. One account is registered with eyebeam, the other one is registered with a SNOM phone. When using the eyebeam client DMTF detection works fine, when using the SNOM phone many digits are missing in the DTMF detection. I analyzed with wireshark and both phones uses RFC 2833 and the trace looks pretty the same. Also the rtp debug log

Hi all, I''m new to this list (and pretty new to backgroundrb). I''d like to jump in with a question, I hope you don''t mind. I''m trying to get my site working with backgroundrb to sent mail. It''s pretty basic stuff and I got it working pretty fast on my local machine (os x leopard). Unfortunately, when I try to deploy to my production machine I

Hi, I am using the JitterBuffer. Since there is not so much documentation I think I dont use it in a correct way. All the packets are recieved (I control the sequence numbers) but the JitterBuffer often tells me he has no packet. I am using it in the following way: I am not sure if I use the ticks correctly but I think it can be set to 20(msec). It is set as a Member in my class and i pointed out where i use it so it is...

Hi, I have a question regarding the Asterisk Packet Time for SIP Calls. It is hardcoded at 20ms but when I do an RTP Analysis on a stream it is clear that these packets are not spaced out at 20ms. In general you see something like: Packet 50 - Delay 50ms Packet 51 - Delay 5ms Packet 52 - Delay 5ms Packet 53 - Delay 50ms Packet 54 - Delay 5ms Packet 55 - Delay 5ms Is there anyway to space them out evenly at 20ms?? This is causing problems with the Sipura SPA200...

...ecided to restructure it since the thread that plays the sound is a callback from the sound hardware, more or less an interrupt handler. For me it seems more reasonable to waste some memory for to save the decompressed Packet. While I write this I begin to think that it is possible I decompress Packets that are never used because they are too late. What is the reason why one should put the compressed Packet in the JitterBuffer? David > (Sorry about the delay -- currently attending ICASSP) > Hi, > > Haven't looked at all the details, but what's clearly wrong is that y...

My BackgrounDRb server intermittently bails out with the following exception in the middle of a long running task running on a Worker sub classed from BackgrounDRb::MetaWorker (the point at which it raises this exception is different each time it runs) /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/packet-0.1.5/lib/packet/packet_core.rb:145:in `schedule_write'': You have a nil object when you

Hello, we have a Linux box running Samba 2.2.7a and several clients running Windows NT 4 WS (last service pack) and Windows 95 (last service pack too). All clients are running a program made in ACU-Cobol for Windows and sometimes the NT machines abort the execution reporting a cobol blocking error. This usually results in broken indexes... We have traced the execution and haven't found the

...d just route the requests over the internet >> (as I said they are publically routable addresses) then we do not >> see these errors, suggesting this is not an application problem. > > Tinc itself changes its symmetric encryption keys every hour. This > could cause > a few packets to be dropped. If that happens with the HTTP connection > you make > every 10 seconds, and the HTTP connection's TCP stream doesn't resend > the > missed packets within your 5 second timeout, then this might explain > the > dropped connections. You can try setting KeyEx...

...oda:~> /sbin/ifconfig eth0 Lien encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:15:F2:39:D4:DF inet adr:10.1.1.158 Bcast:10.1.1.255 Masque:255.255.255.0 adr inet6: fe80::215:f2ff:fe39:d4df/64 Scope:Lien UP BROADCAST NOTRAILERS RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:744 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:507 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 lg file transmission:0 RX bytes:56573 (55.2 Kb) TX bytes:73911 (72.1 Kb) lo Lien encap:Boucle locale inet adr:127.0.0.1 Masque:255.0.0....

Hi, I am using tinc 1.0.23 in router mode and am having trouble with intermittent TCP connect timeouts that do not occur when routing the TCP over the internet directly. I am using a pure IPv6 setup (i.e direct IPv6 connections, and tunneled IPv6 subnets). My configs are as follows: Site 1: ----------------------- tinc.conf: Name = rsukmhb AddressFamily = ipv6 BindToAddress =

Hi, im using a Asterisk Server which is not behind NAT. First i had problems with the fax detection. But this is now solved after adding a wait(2) at the correct place. But i'm still unable to receive a fax due to res_rtp_asterisk.c:3548 ast_rtp_read: RTP Read too short after the Fax session has started. My sip.conf includes [general] allowguest=no alwaysauthreject=yes sendrpid=rpid

...h of the clusters. One process apparently with `status=6/ABRT`, the other with `status=11/SEGV`. Interestingly, they crashed with only 5 minutes difference. The only thing I can come up with that might explain this correlation is that somebody within the same data center decided to send funny UDP packets to everybody that happened to be able to crash tinc, and they did it to first one server and then the other one. I have attached the systemd logs of the two tinc processes. Unfortunately core dumps were disabled on these systems, so I cannot provide those. I have enabled them now in case the probl...

This mornings activity log shows this: . . . From 23.102.132.99 - 2 packets to tcp(3389) From 23.102.133.164 - 1 packet to tcp(3389) From 23.102.134.239 - 2 packets to tcp(3389) From 23.102.136.210 - 3 packets to tcp(3389) From 23.102.136.222 - 2 packets to tcp(3389) From 23.102.137.62 - 3 packets to tcp(3389) From 23.102.137.101 - 2 packets to tcp(3389)...

...fly). reading the ogg file is ok (ogg_sync_pageout, ogg_stream_pagein, ogg_stream_packetout). but writing the file doesn't work - the granulepos and page structures don't match with the original file. here's what i am doing. (python-like pseudo-code). First i create copies of all packets in a page, store them in 'list'; i also save the granule-position of this page: foreach page in oggfile: g=get_granulepos(page) list=[] foreach packet in page: list.append(dup_packet(packet)) # creates a deep copy of packet then i write all pages but the last one to the ou...

Sorry if this comes through twice. I already sent this once, before joining the mailing list. I''m attempting to use Backgroundrb to handle asynchronous pdf creation, but in doing so, I''ve run into a very strange problem. Below is a method that''s called from the controller which creates a new worker, then grabs the worker and calls the ''build_pdf''