thr3ads.net - llvm dev - [llvm-dev] [A bug?] Failed to use BuildMI to add R7 - R12 registers for tADDi8 and tPUSH of ARM [Apr 2019]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Jie Zhou via llvm-dev

2019-Apr-14 19:21 UTC

[llvm-dev] [A bug?] Failed to use BuildMI to add R7 - R12 registers for tADDi8 and tPUSH of ARM

Sorry for not being specific enough. ARMv7-M includes Thumb and Thumb2.
It has 12 regular registers (R0 - R12), and R8 - R12 are used.
I can generate mov instruction that from/ R8-R12 to/from R0-R6.
From this ARM page
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.dui0068b/ch03s03s01.html
R9 - R12 have their conventional usage, but I don’t if this is the reason we
cannot
use them arbitrarily. The fact that we can use it to generate mov instructions
but
not add/sub and push/pop confuses me.

- Jie

On Apr 14, 2019, at 14:55, Craig Topper <craig.topper at
gmail.com<mailto:craig.topper at gmail.com>> wrote:

I don't know much about ARM. But it looks like tADDi8 is a Thumb instruction
and it can only use R0-R7.

tPUSH probably as a similar issue. But it's also a store instruction and
doesn't produce a register output. So you should use the form of BuildMI
that doesn't take a register as its last argument.

~Craig


On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 11:17 AM Jie Zhou via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
Hi all,

I’m trying to insert some add/sub and push/pop instructions in a MachineFunction
pass for ARMv7-M. However, I encountered something weird.
For an add, when I use

        BuildMI(….., TII->get(ARM::tADDi8),
reg).addReg(reg).addReg(reg).addImm(imm).

if reg is R0 - R7, everything is fine: I would get something like

        adds r1, 4

But if I use R8 - R12 as the reg in the BuildMI, I wouldn’t get the correct
register in the assembly code. For example, when I pass R8 to it, I would get

        adds r0, 4

rather than

        adds r8, 4.

Similar problems happen to push and pop instructions. I can create a push/pop if
the register list only contains registers R0 - R7, but
for registers whose number are greater than R7, the generated asm code doesn’t
have it. For example,

        BuildMI(……, TII->get(ARM::tPUSH), R8)…..

would give me

        push {}

Is this a bug in the LLVM ARM code generator? Or is there a reason why we cannot
use big-number registers for add/sub and push/pop?

Thanks,
- Jie
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.llvm.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_llvm-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=KAtyTEI8n3FritxDpKpR7rv3VjdmUs0luiVKZLb_bNI&m=U3D9KaSPCCtUPKPRKsCQl1uo2Kf6PSTT60lRuM6LGO8&s=VbLOmjk6zGsqyFH-PkHGWi4G9iNb4k60I8byBoTgJN4&e=>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190414/ad7c898e/attachment.html>

Craig Topper via llvm-dev

2019-Apr-14 19:28 UTC

head link

[llvm-dev] [A bug?] Failed to use BuildMI to add R7 - R12 registers for tADDi8 and tPUSH of ARM

I believe there is probably a separate instruction in LLVM for thumb2 add.
Probably starting with t2 instead of t.

The definition of tADDi8 looks like this. Where tGPR specifically means
R0-R7.

  def tADDi8 :                    // A8.6.4 T2
    T1sItGenEncodeImm<{1,1,0,?,?}, (outs tGPR:$Rdn),
                      (ins tGPR:$Rn, imm0_255:$imm8), IIC_iALUi,
                      "add", "\t$Rdn, $imm8",
                      [(set tGPR:$Rdn, (add tGPR:$Rn, imm8_255:$imm8))]>,
                      Sched<[WriteALU]>;

~Craig


On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 12:21 PM Jie Zhou <jzhou41 at cs.rochester.edu>
wrote:
> Sorry for not being specific enough. ARMv7-M includes Thumb and Thumb2.
> It has 12 regular registers (R0 - R12), and R8 - R12 are used.
> I can generate mov instruction that from/ R8-R12 to/from R0-R6.
> From this ARM page
>
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.dui0068b/ch03s03s01.html
> R9 - R12 have their conventional usage, but I don’t if this is the reason
> we cannot
> use them arbitrarily. The fact that we can use it to generate mov
> instructions but
> not add/sub and push/pop confuses me.
>
> - Jie
>
> On Apr 14, 2019, at 14:55, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> I don't know much about ARM. But it looks like tADDi8 is a Thumb
> instruction and it can only use R0-R7.
>
> tPUSH probably as a similar issue. But it's also a store instruction
and
> doesn't produce a register output. So you should use the form of
BuildMI
> that doesn't take a register as its last argument.
>
> ~Craig
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 11:17 AM Jie Zhou via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I’m trying to insert some add/sub and push/pop instructions in a
>> MachineFunction pass for ARMv7-M. However, I encountered something
weird.
>> For an add, when I use
>>
>>         BuildMI(….., TII->get(ARM::tADDi8),
>> reg).addReg(reg).addReg(reg).addImm(imm).
>>
>> if reg is R0 - R7, everything is fine: I would get something like
>>
>>         adds r1, 4
>>
>> But if I use R8 - R12 as the reg in the BuildMI, I wouldn’t get the
>> correct register in the assembly code. For example, when I pass R8 to
it, I
>> would get
>>
>>         adds r0, 4
>>
>> rather than
>>
>>         adds r8, 4.
>>
>> Similar problems happen to push and pop instructions. I can create a
>> push/pop if the register list only contains registers R0 - R7, but
>> for registers whose number are greater than R7, the generated asm code
>> doesn’t have it. For example,
>>
>>         BuildMI(……, TII->get(ARM::tPUSH), R8)…..
>>
>> would give me
>>
>>         push {}
>>
>> Is this a bug in the LLVM ARM code generator? Or is there a reason why
we
>> cannot use big-number registers for add/sub and push/pop?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> - Jie
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>>
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.llvm.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_llvm-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=KAtyTEI8n3FritxDpKpR7rv3VjdmUs0luiVKZLb_bNI&m=U3D9KaSPCCtUPKPRKsCQl1uo2Kf6PSTT60lRuM6LGO8&s=VbLOmjk6zGsqyFH-PkHGWi4G9iNb4k60I8byBoTgJN4&e=>
>>
>
>-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190414/4bdbfceb/attachment.html>

Jie Zhou via llvm-dev

2019-Apr-14 19:38 UTC

head link

[llvm-dev] [A bug?] Failed to use BuildMI to add R7 - R12 registers for tADDi8 and tPUSH of ARM

Hi Craig,

Thanks for the information. Can you point to the source that specifies tGPR to
be R0 - R7?
I tried to search in ARMInstrThumb.td but couldn’t find it.

Thanks,
- Jie

On Apr 14, 2019, at 15:28, Craig Topper <craig.topper at
gmail.com<mailto:craig.topper at gmail.com>> wrote:

I believe there is probably a separate instruction in LLVM for thumb2 add.
Probably starting with t2 instead of t.

The definition of tADDi8 looks like this. Where tGPR specifically means R0-R7.

  def tADDi8 :                    // A8.6.4 T2
    T1sItGenEncodeImm<{1,1,0,?,?}, (outs tGPR:$Rdn),
                      (ins tGPR:$Rn, imm0_255:$imm8), IIC_iALUi,
                      "add", "\t$Rdn, $imm8",
                      [(set tGPR:$Rdn, (add tGPR:$Rn, imm8_255:$imm8))]>,
                      Sched<[WriteALU]>;

~Craig


On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 12:21 PM Jie Zhou <jzhou41 at
cs.rochester.edu<mailto:jzhou41 at cs.rochester.edu>> wrote:
Sorry for not being specific enough. ARMv7-M includes Thumb and Thumb2.
It has 12 regular registers (R0 - R12), and R8 - R12 are used.
I can generate mov instruction that from/ R8-R12 to/from R0-R6.
From this ARM page
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.dui0068b/ch03s03s01.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__infocenter.arm.com_help_index.jsp-3Ftopic-3D_com.arm.doc.dui0068b_ch03s03s01.html&d=DwMFaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=KAtyTEI8n3FritxDpKpR7rv3VjdmUs0luiVKZLb_bNI&m=_fpYL_7E5zOQ4DZeiPmiSOgKp7KxZ5mAZVh9wB6CxUY&s=1r2JmIRDr3fxySkwnQU16zv8ySZfoc3nUtLdCcwb4gw&e=>
R9 - R12 have their conventional usage, but I don’t if this is the reason we
cannot
use them arbitrarily. The fact that we can use it to generate mov instructions
but
not add/sub and push/pop confuses me.

- Jie

On Apr 14, 2019, at 14:55, Craig Topper <craig.topper at
gmail.com<mailto:craig.topper at gmail.com>> wrote:

I don't know much about ARM. But it looks like tADDi8 is a Thumb instruction
and it can only use R0-R7.

tPUSH probably as a similar issue. But it's also a store instruction and
doesn't produce a register output. So you should use the form of BuildMI
that doesn't take a register as its last argument.

~Craig


On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 11:17 AM Jie Zhou via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
Hi all,

I’m trying to insert some add/sub and push/pop instructions in a MachineFunction
pass for ARMv7-M. However, I encountered something weird.
For an add, when I use

        BuildMI(….., TII->get(ARM::tADDi8),
reg).addReg(reg).addReg(reg).addImm(imm).

if reg is R0 - R7, everything is fine: I would get something like

        adds r1, 4

But if I use R8 - R12 as the reg in the BuildMI, I wouldn’t get the correct
register in the assembly code. For example, when I pass R8 to it, I would get

        adds r0, 4

rather than

        adds r8, 4.

Similar problems happen to push and pop instructions. I can create a push/pop if
the register list only contains registers R0 - R7, but
for registers whose number are greater than R7, the generated asm code doesn’t
have it. For example,

        BuildMI(……, TII->get(ARM::tPUSH), R8)…..

would give me

        push {}

Is this a bug in the LLVM ARM code generator? Or is there a reason why we cannot
use big-number registers for add/sub and push/pop?

Thanks,
- Jie
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.llvm.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_llvm-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=KAtyTEI8n3FritxDpKpR7rv3VjdmUs0luiVKZLb_bNI&m=U3D9KaSPCCtUPKPRKsCQl1uo2Kf6PSTT60lRuM6LGO8&s=VbLOmjk6zGsqyFH-PkHGWi4G9iNb4k60I8byBoTgJN4&e=>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190414/0e0ea115/attachment.html>

Apparently Analagous Threads

Search for more seemingly similar threads

llvm dev - Apr 2019 - [A bug?] Failed to use BuildMI to add R7 - R12 registers for tADDi8 and tPUSH of ARM

[llvm-dev] [A bug?] Failed to use BuildMI to add R7 - R12 registers for tADDi8 and tPUSH of ARM

[llvm-dev] [A bug?] Failed to use BuildMI to add R7 - R12 registers for tADDi8 and tPUSH of ARM

[llvm-dev] [A bug?] Failed to use BuildMI to add R7 - R12 registers for tADDi8 and tPUSH of ARM

Apparently Analagous Threads