Nadav Rotem
2013-Jul-29 18:23 UTC
[LLVMdev] Enabling the SLP-vectorizer by default for -O3
On Jul 28, 2013, at 12:20 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:> That said, why -O3? I think we should just enable this across the board, as it doesn't seem to cause any size regression under any mode, and the compile time hit is really low.I agree. I think that it would be a good idea to enable it for -Os and -O2, but I’d like to make one step at a time. Thanks, Nadav -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130729/e30f842a/attachment.html>
Jim Grosbach
2013-Jul-29 19:39 UTC
[LLVMdev] Enabling the SLP-vectorizer by default for -O3
On Jul 29, 2013, at 11:23 AM, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote:> > On Jul 28, 2013, at 12:20 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > >> That said, why -O3? I think we should just enable this across the board, as it doesn't seem to cause any size regression under any mode, and the compile time hit is really low. > > > I agree. I think that it would be a good idea to enable it for -Os and -O2, but I’d like to make one step at a time. >These results are really excellent. They’re on Intel, I assume, right? What do the ARM numbers look like? Before enabling by default, we should make sure that the results are comparable there as well. -JIm> Thanks, > Nadav > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130729/d1020776/attachment.html>
Renato Golin
2013-Jul-29 20:07 UTC
[LLVMdev] Enabling the SLP-vectorizer by default for -O3
On 29 July 2013 20:39, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote:> These results are really excellent. They’re on Intel, I assume, right? > What do the ARM numbers look like? Before enabling by default, we should > make sure that the results are comparable there as well. >Hi Jim, I'll have a look. --renato -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130729/7b32b0d3/attachment.html>
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [LLVMdev] Enabling the SLP-vectorizer by default for -O3
- [LLVMdev] Enabling the SLP-vectorizer by default for -O3
- [LLVMdev] Enabling the SLP-vectorizer by default for -O3
- [LLVMdev] Enabling the SLP-vectorizer by default for -O3
- [LLVMdev] Enabling the SLP vectorizer by default for -O3