search for: 7b32b0d3

On Jul 28, 2013, at 12:20 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > That said, why -O3? I think we should just enable this across the board, as it doesn't seem to cause any size regression under any mode, and the compile time hit is really low. I agree. I think that it would be a good idea to enable it for -Os and -O2, but I’d like to make one step at a time.

On Jul 29, 2013, at 11:23 AM, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jul 28, 2013, at 12:20 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > >> That said, why -O3? I think we should just enable this across the board, as it doesn't seem to cause any size regression under any mode, and the compile time hit is really low. > > > I agree. I

...like? Before enabling by default, we should > make sure that the results are comparable there as well. > Hi Jim, I'll have a look. --renato -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130729/7b32b0d3/attachment.html>