Anton Korobeynikov
2013-Apr-04 09:12 UTC
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [Announcement] 3.3 Release Planning!
Renato,>> cortex-a9 sounds fine. It'd be cool if we verified those binaries >> run on a cortex-a8 and a cortex-a15, too. It'd be very, very strange >> if they didn't, but hey, catching very, very strange problems is what >> release testing is for, right? :) > Actually, this is a good idea, I'll set up a Beagle as a buildbot and see > what happens to it.AFAIR, there were several beagles in LLVM Lab. You might want to check with Galina about how live they are. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
Galina Kistanova
2013-Apr-04 18:26 UTC
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [Announcement] 3.3 Release Planning!
Hello everyone,>AFAIR, there were several beagles in LLVM Lab. You might want to checkwith Galina about how live they are. Yes, we have couple beagleboards. I can make them available if this will add value. Maybe we should set a special "release" buildmaster? Which would orchestrate slow bootstrapped builds with extensive testing and collect binaries. This lets us unify the way how it gets built and formally tested. And would save testers time for more advance testing. What do you think? Thanks Galina On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info>wrote:> Renato, > > >> cortex-a9 sounds fine. It'd be cool if we verified those binaries > >> run on a cortex-a8 and a cortex-a15, too. It'd be very, very strange > >> if they didn't, but hey, catching very, very strange problems is what > >> release testing is for, right? :) > > Actually, this is a good idea, I'll set up a Beagle as a buildbot and see > > what happens to it. > AFAIR, there were several beagles in LLVM Lab. You might want to check > with Galina about how live they are. > > -- > With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov > Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130404/0798fc6f/attachment.html>
Renato Golin
2013-Apr-04 19:29 UTC
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [Announcement] 3.3 Release Planning!
On 4 April 2013 19:26, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote:> Yes, we have couple beagleboards. I can make them available if this will > add value. >I think a simple ClangBuilder on it for now would be good. I'm looking into getting a self-hosting Panda on my local buildmaster. If it works, I'll send the patch. I'll only be able to look at beagle boards in a week from now (holidays), so if you have them ready, feel free to use them. Maybe we should set a special "release" buildmaster? Which would> orchestrate slow bootstrapped builds with extensive testing and collect > binaries. This lets us unify the way how it gets built and formally tested. > And would save testers time for more advance testing. >We thought about that for a while, but since the requirements we want for builds are the same we want for CI, the idea was to create the infrastructure for CI and only tag the good builds for release. The collection of binaries is another story, I agree an automated way is necessary, but I have little experience with that. I hear Jenkins can do marvellous things, but I never used it, let alone configure it. Having a buildbot just for the binaries would also work if at the end it'd push to a release server (FTP/HTTP area for download). cheers, --renato -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130404/fcc44a8d/attachment.html>
Reasonably Related Threads
- [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [Announcement] 3.3 Release Planning!
- [LLVMdev] [llvm-lab-wg] FNT testers reporting success even though they failed
- [LLVMdev] [Announcement] 3.3 Release Planning!
- [LLVMdev] [llvm-lab-wg] FNT testers reporting success even though they failed
- Staging buildmaster down?