search for: beagleboard

Hello Out of curiosity, has someone managed to run Asterisk on a Beagleboard for home-use? www.beagleboard.org As an alternative to a PC, it can be powered from a USB hub, so that would make for a compact, fanless Asterisk server. Thank you.

Sandeep Patel wrote: > The Nokia N800 is an OMAP 2420 which is an ARM11. > > If you want an OMAP 3530 today, I think the cheapest route is the Beagleboard. Yeah, I see that now, about the N800. About the BeagleBoard, if you're going after an equivalent # of peripherals (screen and keyboard are things I wanted) then, really, I think that the Pandora is cheapest. I will say, without reservation, that the BeagleBoard is the goddamndest best singl...

My first ARM testing results or lack of them indicate that 3.0 release requires some some beefy machines to build. It is not so much raw cpu speed but memory and lots of it. My builds got to linking llc and at that point linker started eating megabytes of memory like chocolate. So sadly chumbys, beagleboards, iThingis(?), Raspberry Pis, Gumstix and even inexpensive Tegra2 boards seem to be out of contention and relegated to target testing. Based on my observations minimum memory required to build LLVM-3.0 seems to be 768MB to 1GB of RAM plus a 1.2+ GB of free disk space for one kind of build. NVIDIA...

The Nokia N800 is an OMAP 2420 which is an ARM11. If you want an OMAP 3530 today, I think the cheapest route is the Beagleboard. deep On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Chuck Robey <chuckr at telenix.org> wrote: > Bob Wilson wrote: >> On May 20, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Chuck Robey wrote: >>> Hmm.  Well, my motivation is that I recently bought a Pandora (it >>> has the >>> Cortex-A8).  It&...

Bob Wilson wrote: > On May 20, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Chuck Robey wrote: >> Hmm. Well, my motivation is that I recently bought a Pandora (it >> has the >> Cortex-A8). It's not going to arrive here for a couple more months, >> I think. >> When it does finally arrive, I want to be able to immediately begin >> work on >> replacing the Linux that

...... Llvm lab seems is the right place to put them, so people could get an access to boards for debugging. As a general note, my observations shows that slow builds gets less attention from the community then fast ones. This could be an issue with small boards. I have been tried native builds on a beagleboard, it took about 4 hours to build without the tests which is a bit too slow. We will need to find a way to make ARM builds faster. Thanks Galina On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at arm.com> wrote: > On 8 April 2011 11:21, Xerxes Rånby <xerxes at zafena.se&g...

Hi all, Just found out about this codec and I'm really impressed. I compiled celt-0.5.2.tar.gz on my desktop and tried out a few tests. I then did a native fixed point arm compile on my beagleboard which also worked a treat. Before I get started with the library I was trying to see if I could grab some real time audio, encode it and write to a file using arecord in conjunction with celtenc. I tried this using the below command but unfortunately the encoder just exists straight away with no...

...s or lack of them indicate > that 3.0 release requires some some beefy machines to build. > It is not so much raw cpu speed but memory and lots of it. > My builds got to linking llc and at that point linker started > eating megabytes of memory like chocolate. > > So sadly chumbys, beagleboards, iThingis(?), Raspberry Pis, Gumstix > and even inexpensive Tegra2 boards seem to be out of contention > and relegated to target testing. > > Based on my observations minimum memory required to build LLVM-3.0 > seems to be 768MB to 1GB of RAM plus a 1.2+ GB of free disk space > f...

On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Adve, Vikram Sadanand <vadve at illinois.edu> wrote: > I'm trying to decide whether to use either the MIPS or ARM back ends for course projects in our introductory compiler class.  I'd like to use something that has a stable back end, so that the students can use the selector, probably without changes, and do a project on register allocation and

...e, part to Samuel, and part to Sandeep, I decided that writing 3 different replies would have been too much like pestering. Reply to any part you feel like, it all is about (ultimately) my wanting to use the llvm to support moving FreeBSD to run on the OMAP3530 as shown on the Pandora or maybe the BeagleBoard. ------------------------------------------------------ Well, seeing as studying the Cortex code until my Pandora shows up seems like time well spent, I'm going to be studying the llvm project as mush as I'm capable of. I don't know if I'll improve quickly enough to be of service...

Hello everyone, >AFAIR, there were several beagles in LLVM Lab. You might want to check with Galina about how live they are. Yes, we have couple beagleboards. I can make them available if this will add value. Maybe we should set a special "release" buildmaster? Which would orchestrate slow bootstrapped builds with extensive testing and collect binaries. This lets us unify the way how it gets built and formally tested. And would save testers...

...-0000 From: Steve Langasek <steve.langasek at canonical.com> Subject: [Bug 527720] Re: thumb2 porting issues identified: klibc uses mov.*pc I've also touched it up to be mergeable with Debian (support v4t builds with #ifdef). Confirmed that installing the resulting klibc packages on my beagleboard gives me a successfully-booting initramfs with klibc; and the vfork/setjmptest test cases all pass in the klibc package tree. Fixes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klibc/+bug/527720 --- klibc-1.5.20.orig/usr/klibc/arch/arm/vfork.S +++ klibc-1.5.20/usr/klibc/arch/arm/vfork.S @@ -25,7 +2...

Renato, >> cortex-a9 sounds fine. It'd be cool if we verified those binaries >> run on a cortex-a8 and a cortex-a15, too. It'd be very, very strange >> if they didn't, but hey, catching very, very strange problems is what >> release testing is for, right? :) > Actually, this is a good idea, I'll set up a Beagle as a buildbot and see > what happens to

Hi, - Cortex-A8 needs a specific instruction scheduler as dual issue forces you to interleave some instructions to allow to run two instructions in the same cycle for the best performance (Cortex-A9 is out-of-order so dual issue is not an issue (!) for performance). - Cortex-A8/A9 have several useful new instructions : for instance, bit operations like bitfield insertion/extraction or having

Admittedly we're very interested in becoming ARM backend maintainers as our product heavily relies on LLVM. However, we don't have testing resources to test both our product and LLVM on a host of target boards. We have some chumbys, beagleboards, iPhones, iPod Touches, tables, Android Phones, etc. And most of those are already booked solid with our own regression tests (most of which are based on llvm-test-suite) Could ARM enable us with testing hardware/resources? Thanks! Joe Abbey Software Architect Arxan Technologies, Inc. 1305 Cum...

...ep, I >> decided that writing 3 different replies would have been too much like >> pestering. Reply to any part you feel like, it all is about (ultimately) my >> wanting to use the llvm to support moving FreeBSD to run on the OMAP3530 as >> shown on the Pandora or maybe the BeagleBoard. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Well, seeing as studying the Cortex code until my Pandora shows up seems like >> time well spent, I'm going to be studying the llvm project as mush as I'm >> capable of. I don't know...

...nd part to Sandeep, I > decided that writing 3 different replies would have been too much like > pestering.  Reply to any part you feel like, it all is about (ultimately) my > wanting to use the llvm to support moving FreeBSD to run on the OMAP3530 as > shown on the Pandora or maybe the BeagleBoard. > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Well, seeing as studying the Cortex code until my Pandora shows up seems like > time well spent, I'm going to be studying the llvm project as mush as I'm > capable of.  I don't know if I'll improve qui...

...VMdev] LLC ARM Backend maintainer > > Admittedly we're very interested in becoming ARM backend maintainers as our product heavily relies on LLVM. > > However, we don't have testing resources to test both our product and LLVM on a host of target boards. We have some chumbys, beagleboards, iPhones, iPod Touches, tables, Android Phones, etc. And most of those are already booked solid with our own regression tests (most of which are based on llvm-test-suite) > > Could ARM enable us with testing hardware/resources? > > Thanks! > > Joe Abbey > Software Archi...

Use klibc way to define a system dependent preprocessor definition: disabled by default and enabled for newer arm. Based on a patch by vorlon that got tested on his beagleboard, should be functional equivalent. Fixes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klibc/+bug/527720 Cc: Steve Langasek <steve.langasek at canonical.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill at shutemov.name> Cc: Michael Tokarev <mjt at tls.msk.ru> Signed-off-by: maximilian attems <...

...Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLC ARM Backend maintainer Admittedly we're very interested in becoming ARM backend maintainers as our product heavily relies on LLVM. However, we don't have testing resources to test both our product and LLVM on a host of target boards. We have some chumbys, beagleboards, iPhones, iPod Touches, tables, Android Phones, etc. And most of those are already booked solid with our own regression tests (most of which are based on llvm-test-suite) Could ARM enable us with testing hardware/resources? Thanks! Joe Abbey Software Architect Arxan Technologies, Inc....