search for: beagleboards

Hello Out of curiosity, has someone managed to run Asterisk on a Beagleboard for home-use? www.beagleboard.org As an alternative to a PC, it can be powered from a USB hub, so that would make for a compact, fanless Asterisk server. Thank you.

Sandeep Patel wrote: > The Nokia N800 is an OMAP 2420 which is an ARM11. > > If you want an OMAP 3530 today, I think the cheapest route is the Beagleboard. Yeah, I see that now, about the N800. About the BeagleBoard, if you're going after an equivalent # of peripherals (screen and keyboard are things I wanted) then, really, I think that the Pandora is cheapest. I will say, without

My first ARM testing results or lack of them indicate that 3.0 release requires some some beefy machines to build. It is not so much raw cpu speed but memory and lots of it. My builds got to linking llc and at that point linker started eating megabytes of memory like chocolate. So sadly chumbys, beagleboards, iThingis(?), Raspberry Pis, Gumstix and even inexpensive Tegra2 boards seem to be out of contention and relegated to target testing. Based on my observations minimum memory required to build LLVM-3.0 seems to be 768MB to 1GB of RAM plus a 1.2+ GB of free disk space for one kind of build. NVIDIA...

The Nokia N800 is an OMAP 2420 which is an ARM11. If you want an OMAP 3530 today, I think the cheapest route is the Beagleboard. deep On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Chuck Robey <chuckr at telenix.org> wrote: > Bob Wilson wrote: >> On May 20, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Chuck Robey wrote: >>> Hmm.  Well, my motivation is that I recently bought a Pandora (it >>> has the

Bob Wilson wrote: > On May 20, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Chuck Robey wrote: >> Hmm. Well, my motivation is that I recently bought a Pandora (it >> has the >> Cortex-A8). It's not going to arrive here for a couple more months, >> I think. >> When it does finally arrive, I want to be able to immediately begin >> work on >> replacing the Linux that

Hi Renato, >I was recently investigating the build bot infrastructure and noticed >that the arm-linux target is failing for quite a long time. I believe >that it means ARM code is not executed all that often in LLVM tests, >is that correct? >We were wondering what kind of support we could give to make sure ARM >code is correct and don't regress, specially before releases (I

Hi all, Just found out about this codec and I'm really impressed. I compiled celt-0.5.2.tar.gz on my desktop and tried out a few tests. I then did a native fixed point arm compile on my beagleboard which also worked a treat. Before I get started with the library I was trying to see if I could grab some real time audio, encode it and write to a file using arecord in conjunction with

...s or lack of them indicate > that 3.0 release requires some some beefy machines to build. > It is not so much raw cpu speed but memory and lots of it. > My builds got to linking llc and at that point linker started > eating megabytes of memory like chocolate. > > So sadly chumbys, beagleboards, iThingis(?), Raspberry Pis, Gumstix > and even inexpensive Tegra2 boards seem to be out of contention > and relegated to target testing. > > Based on my observations minimum memory required to build LLVM-3.0 > seems to be 768MB to 1GB of RAM plus a 1.2+ GB of free disk space > fo...

On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Adve, Vikram Sadanand <vadve at illinois.edu> wrote: > I'm trying to decide whether to use either the MIPS or ARM back ends for course projects in our introductory compiler class.  I'd like to use something that has a stable back end, so that the students can use the selector, probably without changes, and do a project on register allocation and

Christophe Avoinne wrote: > Hi, > > - Cortex-A8 needs a specific instruction scheduler as dual issue forces > you to interleave some instructions to allow to run two instructions in > the same cycle for the best performance (Cortex-A9 is out-of-order so > dual issue is not an issue (!) for performance). > - Cortex-A8/A9 have several useful new instructions : for instance,

Hello everyone, >AFAIR, there were several beagles in LLVM Lab. You might want to check with Galina about how live they are. Yes, we have couple beagleboards. I can make them available if this will add value. Maybe we should set a special "release" buildmaster? Which would orchestrate slow bootstrapped builds with extensive testing and collect binaries. This lets us unify the way how it gets built and formally tested. And would save testers t...

hello vorlon, got notified of your patch, will apply next days upstream unless some critiques are voiced on ml. thanks. -- maks ----- Forwarded message from Steve Langasek <steve.langasek at canonical.com> ----- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:05:42 -0000 From: Steve Langasek <steve.langasek at canonical.com> Subject: [Bug 527720] Re: thumb2 porting issues identified: klibc uses

Renato, >> cortex-a9 sounds fine. It'd be cool if we verified those binaries >> run on a cortex-a8 and a cortex-a15, too. It'd be very, very strange >> if they didn't, but hey, catching very, very strange problems is what >> release testing is for, right? :) > Actually, this is a good idea, I'll set up a Beagle as a buildbot and see > what happens to

Hi, - Cortex-A8 needs a specific instruction scheduler as dual issue forces you to interleave some instructions to allow to run two instructions in the same cycle for the best performance (Cortex-A9 is out-of-order so dual issue is not an issue (!) for performance). - Cortex-A8/A9 have several useful new instructions : for instance, bit operations like bitfield insertion/extraction or having

Admittedly we're very interested in becoming ARM backend maintainers as our product heavily relies on LLVM. However, we don't have testing resources to test both our product and LLVM on a host of target boards. We have some chumbys, beagleboards, iPhones, iPod Touches, tables, Android Phones, etc. And most of those are already booked solid with our own regression tests (most of which are based on llvm-test-suite) Could ARM enable us with testing hardware/resources? Thanks! Joe Abbey Software Architect Arxan Technologies, Inc. 1305 Cumb...

Sandeep Patel wrote: > My goal is to have Cortex-A9 support complete in far less than three > months. I've recently gotten some additional help toward that goal, so > the pace should pick up soon. > > As far as compiler texts, there are many newer texts to recommend as > just about all the major optimization passes are done differently > after SSA-form appeared in about

My goal is to have Cortex-A9 support complete in far less than three months. I've recently gotten some additional help toward that goal, so the pace should pick up soon. As far as compiler texts, there are many newer texts to recommend as just about all the major optimization passes are done differently after SSA-form appeared in about 1991. However, for adding Cortex-A8 support, I don't

...VMdev] LLC ARM Backend maintainer > > Admittedly we're very interested in becoming ARM backend maintainers as our product heavily relies on LLVM. > > However, we don't have testing resources to test both our product and LLVM on a host of target boards. We have some chumbys, beagleboards, iPhones, iPod Touches, tables, Android Phones, etc. And most of those are already booked solid with our own regression tests (most of which are based on llvm-test-suite) > > Could ARM enable us with testing hardware/resources? > > Thanks! > > Joe Abbey > Software Archit...

Use klibc way to define a system dependent preprocessor definition: disabled by default and enabled for newer arm. Based on a patch by vorlon that got tested on his beagleboard, should be functional equivalent. Fixes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klibc/+bug/527720 Cc: Steve Langasek <steve.langasek at canonical.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill at shutemov.name> Cc:

...Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLC ARM Backend maintainer Admittedly we're very interested in becoming ARM backend maintainers as our product heavily relies on LLVM. However, we don't have testing resources to test both our product and LLVM on a host of target boards. We have some chumbys, beagleboards, iPhones, iPod Touches, tables, Android Phones, etc. And most of those are already booked solid with our own regression tests (most of which are based on llvm-test-suite) Could ARM enable us with testing hardware/resources? Thanks! Joe Abbey Software Architect Arxan Technologies, Inc....