Ulrich Weigand
2012-Oct-23 14:52 UTC
[LLVMdev] [cfe-commits] [PATCH/RFC, PowerPC] Extend 32-bit function arguments / return values
Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote on 23.10.2012 15:54:47:> > Well, I guess the "exact triple" would specify Intel, right? In which > > case the IR wouldn't really have to change ... > > > > However, this would mean a whole bunch of test cases either wouldn't > > be executed at all on non-Intel platforms, or else we'd have to have > > (near-)duplicates of the tests for different platforms. Neither option > > looks really desirable to me. > > There are not that many tests and they are not very platform > dependent, so I don't thing you are losing too much by adding a triple > to them.Well, fine with me. I can prepare a patch to add the triple. Which triple would you suggest to use for this? i386-apple-darwin ? i386-pc-linux-gnu ? i386-unknown-unknown ? (I don't have Darwin systems to test on myself. I could test either of the latter on Linux/Intel ...) Thanks, Ulrich
Rafael Espíndola
2012-Oct-23 16:00 UTC
[LLVMdev] [cfe-commits] [PATCH/RFC, PowerPC] Extend 32-bit function arguments / return values
> Which triple would you suggest to use for this? > > i386-apple-darwin ? > i386-pc-linux-gnu ? > i386-unknown-unknown ? > > (I don't have Darwin systems to test on myself. I could test either of > the latter on Linux/Intel ...)If they pass with i386-unknown-unknown, that is probably the best.> Thanks, > Ulrich >Thanks, Rafael
Ulrich Weigand
2012-Oct-23 16:31 UTC
[LLVMdev] [cfe-commits] [PATCH/RFC, PowerPC] Extend 32-bit function arguments / return values
Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote on 23.10.2012 18:00:36:> > Which triple would you suggest to use for this? > > > > i386-apple-darwin ? > > i386-pc-linux-gnu ? > > i386-unknown-unknown ? > > > > (I don't have Darwin systems to test on myself. I could test either of > > the latter on Linux/Intel ...) > > If they pass with i386-unknown-unknown, that is probably the best.OK, the appended patch implements this. All tests pass (both on a PowerPC-Linux and a Intel-Linux host), and continue passing with my original ppc64 ABI patch added, as expected. Bye, Ulrich (See attached file: diff-clang-ppc64-extend-testfixes) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: diff-clang-ppc64-extend-testfixes Type: application/octet-stream Size: 11426 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121023/9f5e0439/attachment.obj>
Reasonably Related Threads
- [LLVMdev] [cfe-commits] [PATCH/RFC, PowerPC] Extend 32-bit function arguments / return values
- [LLVMdev] [cfe-commits] [PATCH/RFC, PowerPC] Extend 32-bit function arguments / return values
- [LLVMdev] [cfe-commits] [PATCH/RFC, PowerPC] Extend 32-bit function arguments / return values
- [LLVMdev] [cfe-commits] [PATCH/RFC, PowerPC] Extend 32-bit function arguments / return values
- [LLVMdev] [cfe-commits] [PATCH/RFC, PowerPC] Extend 32-bit function arguments / return values