search for: testfixes

> Which triple would you suggest to use for this? > > i386-apple-darwin ? > i386-pc-linux-gnu ? > i386-unknown-unknown ? > > (I don't have Darwin systems to test on myself. I could test either of > the latter on Linux/Intel ...) If they pass with i386-unknown-unknown, that is probably the best. > Thanks, > Ulrich > Thanks, Rafael

Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote on 23.10.2012 15:54:47: > > Well, I guess the "exact triple" would specify Intel, right? In which > > case the IR wouldn't really have to change ... > > > > However, this would mean a whole bunch of test cases either wouldn't > > be executed at all on non-Intel platforms, or else we'd

...y pass with i386-unknown-unknown, that is probably the best. OK, the appended patch implements this. All tests pass (both on a PowerPC-Linux and a Intel-Linux host), and continue passing with my original ppc64 ABI patch added, as expected. Bye, Ulrich (See attached file: diff-clang-ppc64-extend-testfixes) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: diff-clang-ppc64-extend-testfixes Type: application/octet-stream Size: 11426 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121023/9f5e0439/attachment.obj>