search for: commits

Hi Chris and John, You are listed as administrators for llvm-commits. Can you provide some help in this issue: that my LLVM svn commit messages do not reach llvm-commits? /Patrik Hägglund -----Original Message----- From: llvm-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvm-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Patrik Hägglund H Sent: den 28 november 2012 22:19...

On 11/28/2012 03:47 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote: > > Le 28 nov. 2012 à 15:07, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> a écrit : > >> Hi, >> >> I just realized non of Patrik's commit mails has every reached llvm-commits. Neither my own archive nor the web interface contains commit messages for any of his commits. The relevant commits are >> >> 168785, 168516, 168507, 167924, 157381, 157323, 157320, 157319, 157184 >> >> Does anybody have any idea why those commit mails would get lost? Or did...

I noticed today that there are some commits that get pushed upstream, but not to master or any other branch either. For example: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d272d3a1885a82d6ccf5b3d5b6841f79d81e24e5 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6762d53b66d9de18825f09f43c3d6c2b3ea95913 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commi...

> @Patrik: would you mind to check if you are subscribed with your ericsson email address? As far as I can see, I'm subscribed to llvm-commits with the same email address used in commits (I get buildbot failure emails to the same mail account as llvm-commits messages). (BTW, why should my subscription status to llvm-commits matter?) > It would be nice to see your commit mails. Yes, indeed. :-) Unfortunately, I can't tell what'...

...> On 17/12/2019 22:25, James Y Knight wrote: > > I think it would probably make the most sense to land this as a single > > merge-commit (from the 2700-commit rewritten history you've created) > > onto llvm-project master, rather than as 2700 individual toplevel > > commits to master. (Which means: disable the merge-commit prohibition > > in the github configuration, temporarily, push this commit, and then > > enable it again). > > I understood that the LLVM project did not accept any merge commit so > far. It seems a shame to make an exception if...

New branch ''rtmp'' available with the following commits: commit 03292617084fb246a2f23f566d9b5a1afafede41 Author: Benjamin Otte <otte at gnome.org> Date: Sun Dec 14 21:43:56 2008 +0100 split in_error() from is_connected() commit 139261910ef6120f56c6c6749a3843c5dd4af4e4 Author: Benjamin Otte <otte at gnome.org> Date: Sun Dec 14 21:25...

Has anyone noticed missing llvm-commits messages? Not all commits seem to generate emails to llvm-commits. For example, I can’t find an email for this commit: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4a6e13ad88ddcc0ab92ace49d4c761921e7f7070 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4a6e13ad88ddcc0ab92ace49d4c761921e7f7070>...

I have made claims that I have not left the compiz project and that I have been maintaining it over the past 4 years, despite the lack of releases by not fault but my own. At the request of some of the original compiz developers, I am now posting a compilation of some of the contributions I've made over time, since the beginning. Since the most important contributions are code and easiest to

...+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ mozilla-sucks/obsolete/protypes.h | 254 +++++ mozilla-sucks/prcpucfg.h | 707 ++++++++++++++ mozilla-sucks/prtypes.h | 547 +++++++++++ src/Makefile.am | 4 18 files changed, 8143 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) New commits: commit 8d1f2c33bdd45cfdc1f0c47e6a91f27bcca803eb Author: Benjamin Otte <otte at gnome.org> Date: Thu May 31 23:54:33 2007 +0200 changeMozilla inclusion We include the headers locally now and don't use Mozilla libs. This allows using it no matter how screwed up the dist...

On 29.11.2012, at 15:53, Patrik Hägglund H <patrik.h.hagglund at ericsson.com> wrote: > Hi Chris and John, > > You are listed as administrators for llvm-commits. Can you provide some help in this issue: that my LLVM svn commit messages do not reach llvm-commits? My guess: the mailer may have issues with the non-ascii character "ä" in your name. See also http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080428/061915.html - Ben >...

...an say is, *wow* is it nice. I hid everything I don't care about using a sparse checkout [4]. Many of my tools (e.g. ctrl-p [5] [6], ycm [7]) suddenly work better now that there isn't an artificial boundary between my clang and llvm repositories. I can have patch queues that include LLVM commits and clang commits arbitrarily interspersed with one another -- something I didn't realize I wanted until I made the switch and noticed I already had branches I could merge (and something we can't do with Bogner's suggested multirepo workflow). [1] https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-p...

...y thing a monorepo gets you" isn't something that you need a monorepo to get. This is an *extremely important* point to understand, so let me try to be really clear about the current state of the world and the state of the world under the two "move to git" proposals. Today, all commits ultimately end up in SVN. Our SVN is a effectively a monorepo, so today, a single commit can touch multiple subprojects. How you get the commit into SVN is your business. Maybe you can hack git-svn somehow to do the atomic commit. (If this is possible, it's beyond my ken.) Alternatively you...

...0 : FOID 129644 Completed in 12 ms 2009 Jan 23 23:34:37: ZIL Commit : Seq 183211410 : FOID 129644 Completed in 49 ms 2009 Jan 23 23:34:37: ZIL Commit : Seq 7781413 : FOID 24869 Completed in 849 ms </pre> For all the calls with the same FOID, does that mean they are ZIL commits on the same POSIX file? I see no easy way to trace these commits back through all the layers to determine which file it is, but just knowing that some file is being hammered on more than another is something worth knowing. benr. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

Hi Kashyap Chamarthy: thank you very much for answer my question: 一： lead to VM filesystem becoming read-only 1： test case it lead to VM filesystem becoming read-only test case as follows: we want to snapshot for VM , to obtain VM incremental data，and use virsh blockcommit，qemu-img commit，qemu-img rebase to shorten snapshot chain. Details are as follows（when VM running state， we perform the

...but with the difference between "rebase and merge" and "squash and mere". We have used basically 3 different processes: Method 1: start a review with one commit on a new branch (typically in a personal repository 'fork'). Respond to review comments by adding additional commits on the same branch. Then you want to "Squash and Merge". Real life example: https://github.com/llvm/circt/pull/62 Note that Github keeps seems to keep a reference to commits where a review occurred, but does not necessarily preserve other commits in the chain. Also note that you can go...

Hi everyone, I recently was granted commit access, but I'm not really sure what is the process. The developer policy states: "You are granted *commit-after-approval* to all parts of LLVM. To get approval, submit a patch <https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#patch> to llvm-commits <http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits>. When approved, you may commit it yourself." Do I have to send the patch to llvm-commits via email and wait for approval even when the patch has been accepted in the reviews (i.e. Phabricator) ? Best, Stefanos -------------- next p...

...t; The only thing a monorepo gets you that strictly isn’t possible without > it is the ability to commit to multiple projects in a single commit. > Personally I don’t think that is a big enough justification, but that is > my opinion, not a fact. Okay, I just bumped into r277008, in which commits to llvm, clang, and clang-tools-extra all have the same SVN revision number. I don't know how it happened but it did. Is this just an artifact of how somebody pasted together a bunch of git-svn projects, or is it something that a top-level git repo with submodules would allow? And if it is, th...

Speed is one of the most important goals for the new ELF linker. I ran a benchmark for every commit to LLD/ELF that was made after the last October, and I'd like to share the result. The motivation is to see if the linker is getting slower as we add more features, and if so, which commits are heavy ones in terms of performance. I measured time to link the same Clang executable. Here is the result. This table contains a commit message, a SVN revision number, time to link, size of the resulting Clang binary in each row. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QlQZ51VQUna6gX0qXj19v_Z...

Hi, I just realized non of Patrik's commit mails has every reached llvm-commits. Neither my own archive nor the web interface contains commit messages for any of his commits. The relevant commits are 168785, 168516, 168507, 167924, 157381, 157323, 157320, 157319, 157184 Does anybody have any idea why those commit mails would get lost? Or did I just overlook something? Che...

New branch 'linear' available with the following commits: commit 37812ef682f70d5166ecdce48523d86495efdc84 Author: Benjamin Otte <otte at gnome.org> Date: Mon Jan 14 20:15:13 2008 +0100 whoops, typo commit 6b93b528ca25ac23cb6758611aae1009f46b2ae3 Author: Benjamin Otte <otte at gnome.org> Date: Mon Jan 14 20:13:53 2008 +0100 catc...