On Sep 7, 2012, at 3:40 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote:> The linking issue is a recent breakage. > I traced it back to r163175. Basically LLVMConstInlineAsm() got an additional parameter, but the C headers and the OCaml bindings were not updated accordingly.r163175 was my change. I'm not familiar with the OCaml project. If I'm responsible for updating said C headers/OCaml bindings, would someone mind pointing me in the right direction? If not, let me know if I can be of assistance. Chad> > About the miscompilations, can you provide further details? > > Nuno > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> I've recently upgraded my project-local copy of LLVM from 3.1svn to the latest 3.2svn, and all hell broke loose in my attempts to build OCaml projects. >> >> Trying to narrow it down, I tried testing examples/OCaml-Kaleidoscope and eventually test/Bindings, only to discover that literally nothing in the repository which uses the OCaml bindings seems to build in the current trunk: >> >> - OCaml-Kaleidoscope/Chapter{2-6} fail early with apparent Makefile misconfigurations >> - test/Bindings/OCaml/* fail to link for lack of `_LLVMConstInlineAsm`, which is also the first (of many) symbols I struggled to link correctly in my own project after upgrading and rebuilding. >> >> Is this a known state of affairs? >> >> This came up first on OS X 10.8.1, Homebrew OCaml 3.12.1, and a fresh bare checkout of trunk at 163420. I reproduced it exactly on Ubuntu 12.04 (with stock OCaml 3.12.1 and trunk at 163420). >> >> Thanks. >
Didn't Benjamin already fix this in svn 163502? On Sep 10, 2012, at 10:08 AM, Chad Rosier <mcrosier at apple.com> wrote:> > On Sep 7, 2012, at 3:40 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote: > >> The linking issue is a recent breakage. >> I traced it back to r163175. Basically LLVMConstInlineAsm() got an additional parameter, but the C headers and the OCaml bindings were not updated accordingly. > > r163175 was my change. I'm not familiar with the OCaml project. If I'm responsible for updating said C headers/OCaml bindings, would someone mind pointing me in the right direction? If not, let me know if I can be of assistance. > > Chad > >> >> About the miscompilations, can you provide further details? >> >> Nuno >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> I've recently upgraded my project-local copy of LLVM from 3.1svn to the latest 3.2svn, and all hell broke loose in my attempts to build OCaml projects. >>> >>> Trying to narrow it down, I tried testing examples/OCaml-Kaleidoscope and eventually test/Bindings, only to discover that literally nothing in the repository which uses the OCaml bindings seems to build in the current trunk: >>> >>> - OCaml-Kaleidoscope/Chapter{2-6} fail early with apparent Makefile misconfigurations >>> - test/Bindings/OCaml/* fail to link for lack of `_LLVMConstInlineAsm`, which is also the first (of many) symbols I struggled to link correctly in my own project after upgrading and rebuilding. >>> >>> Is this a known state of affairs? >>> >>> This came up first on OS X 10.8.1, Homebrew OCaml 3.12.1, and a fresh bare checkout of trunk at 163420. I reproduced it exactly on Ubuntu 12.04 (with stock OCaml 3.12.1 and trunk at 163420). >>> >>> Thanks. >> > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
On Sep 10, 2012, at 3:34 PM, Bob Wilson wrote:> Didn't Benjamin already fix this in svn 163502?Looks that way..> On Sep 10, 2012, at 10:08 AM, Chad Rosier <mcrosier at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Sep 7, 2012, at 3:40 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote: >> >>> The linking issue is a recent breakage. >>> I traced it back to r163175. Basically LLVMConstInlineAsm() got an additional parameter, but the C headers and the OCaml bindings were not updated accordingly. >> >> r163175 was my change. I'm not familiar with the OCaml project. If I'm responsible for updating said C headers/OCaml bindings, would someone mind pointing me in the right direction? If not, let me know if I can be of assistance. >> >> Chad >> >>> >>> About the miscompilations, can you provide further details? >>> >>> Nuno >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> I've recently upgraded my project-local copy of LLVM from 3.1svn to the latest 3.2svn, and all hell broke loose in my attempts to build OCaml projects. >>>> >>>> Trying to narrow it down, I tried testing examples/OCaml-Kaleidoscope and eventually test/Bindings, only to discover that literally nothing in the repository which uses the OCaml bindings seems to build in the current trunk: >>>> >>>> - OCaml-Kaleidoscope/Chapter{2-6} fail early with apparent Makefile misconfigurations >>>> - test/Bindings/OCaml/* fail to link for lack of `_LLVMConstInlineAsm`, which is also the first (of many) symbols I struggled to link correctly in my own project after upgrading and rebuilding. >>>> >>>> Is this a known state of affairs? >>>> >>>> This came up first on OS X 10.8.1, Homebrew OCaml 3.12.1, and a fresh bare checkout of trunk at 163420. I reproduced it exactly on Ubuntu 12.04 (with stock OCaml 3.12.1 and trunk at 163420). >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >