search for: r163175

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "r163175".

2012 Sep 10
2
[LLVMdev] OCaml bindings broken in trunk
On Sep 7, 2012, at 3:40 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote: > The linking issue is a recent breakage. > I traced it back to r163175. Basically LLVMConstInlineAsm() got an additional parameter, but the C headers and the OCaml bindings were not updated accordingly. r163175 was my change. I'm not familiar with the OCaml project. If I'm responsible for updating said C headers/OCaml bindings, would someone mind pointing m...
2012 Sep 10
0
[LLVMdev] OCaml bindings broken in trunk
Didn't Benjamin already fix this in svn 163502? On Sep 10, 2012, at 10:08 AM, Chad Rosier <mcrosier at apple.com> wrote: > > On Sep 7, 2012, at 3:40 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote: > >> The linking issue is a recent breakage. >> I traced it back to r163175. Basically LLVMConstInlineAsm() got an additional parameter, but the C headers and the OCaml bindings were not updated accordingly. > > r163175 was my change. I'm not familiar with the OCaml project. If I'm responsible for updating said C headers/OCaml bindings, would someone mind...
2012 Sep 10
1
[LLVMdev] OCaml bindings broken in trunk
...ready fix this in svn 163502? Looks that way.. > On Sep 10, 2012, at 10:08 AM, Chad Rosier <mcrosier at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Sep 7, 2012, at 3:40 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote: >> >>> The linking issue is a recent breakage. >>> I traced it back to r163175. Basically LLVMConstInlineAsm() got an additional parameter, but the C headers and the OCaml bindings were not updated accordingly. >> >> r163175 was my change. I'm not familiar with the OCaml project. If I'm responsible for updating said C headers/OCaml bindings, would someo...
2012 Sep 07
0
[LLVMdev] OCaml bindings broken in trunk
The linking issue is a recent breakage. I traced it back to r163175. Basically LLVMConstInlineAsm() got an additional parameter, but the C headers and the OCaml bindings were not updated accordingly. About the miscompilations, can you provide further details? Nuno ----- Original Message ----- > I've recently upgraded my project-local copy of LLVM from...
2012 Sep 07
2
[LLVMdev] OCaml bindings broken in trunk
I've recently upgraded my project-local copy of LLVM from 3.1svn to the latest 3.2svn, and all hell broke loose in my attempts to build OCaml projects. Trying to narrow it down, I tried testing examples/OCaml-Kaleidoscope and eventually test/Bindings, only to discover that literally nothing in the repository which uses the OCaml bindings seems to build in the current trunk: -