search for: llvmconstinlineasm

On Sep 7, 2012, at 3:40 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote: > The linking issue is a recent breakage. > I traced it back to r163175. Basically LLVMConstInlineAsm() got an additional parameter, but the C headers and the OCaml bindings were not updated accordingly. r163175 was my change. I'm not familiar with the OCaml project. If I'm responsible for updating said C headers/OCaml bindings, would someone mind pointing me in the right direction? If...

The linking issue is a recent breakage. I traced it back to r163175. Basically LLVMConstInlineAsm() got an additional parameter, but the C headers and the OCaml bindings were not updated accordingly. About the miscompilations, can you provide further details? Nuno ----- Original Message ----- > I've recently upgraded my project-local copy of LLVM from 3.1svn to the > latest 3.2...

...oscope and eventually test/Bindings, only to discover that literally nothing in the repository which uses the OCaml bindings seems to build in the current trunk: - OCaml-Kaleidoscope/Chapter{2-6} fail early with apparent Makefile misconfigurations - test/Bindings/OCaml/* fail to link for lack of `_LLVMConstInlineAsm`, which is also the first (of many) symbols I struggled to link correctly in my own project after upgrading and rebuilding. Is this a known state of affairs? This came up first on OS X 10.8.1, Homebrew OCaml 3.12.1, and a fresh bare checkout of trunk at 163420. I reproduced it exactly on Ubuntu 1...

Didn't Benjamin already fix this in svn 163502? On Sep 10, 2012, at 10:08 AM, Chad Rosier <mcrosier at apple.com> wrote: > > On Sep 7, 2012, at 3:40 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote: > >> The linking issue is a recent breakage. >> I traced it back to r163175. Basically LLVMConstInlineAsm() got an additional parameter, but the C headers and the OCaml bindings were not updated accordingly. > > r163175 was my change. I'm not familiar with the OCaml project. If I'm responsible for updating said C headers/OCaml bindings, would someone mind pointing me in the right direc...

...vn 163502? Looks that way.. > On Sep 10, 2012, at 10:08 AM, Chad Rosier <mcrosier at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Sep 7, 2012, at 3:40 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote: >> >>> The linking issue is a recent breakage. >>> I traced it back to r163175. Basically LLVMConstInlineAsm() got an additional parameter, but the C headers and the OCaml bindings were not updated accordingly. >> >> r163175 was my change. I'm not familiar with the OCaml project. If I'm responsible for updating said C headers/OCaml bindings, would someone mind pointing me in the rig...