On Aug 9, 2012, at 10:09 AM, Sergei Larin <slarin at codeaurora.org> wrote:> Yang, > > This might not be such a tough choice on engineering side - one of the > LLVM differentiators is the ground-up, early introduced support for VLIW > specific features…Actually, LLVM lacked support for VLIW until fairly recently, and it has relatively few VLIW-specific features. Dan
But we are really striving to change it fast :) Dan, My comparative point was that LLVM has a greater potential to accommodate VLIW going forward than GCC does at this point. Would you agree to that? Sergei -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum.> -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Gohman [mailto:gohman at apple.com] > Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 12:30 PM > To: Sergei Larin > Cc: 'Triple Yang'; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] VLIW code generation for LLVM backend > > > On Aug 9, 2012, at 10:09 AM, Sergei Larin <slarin at codeaurora.org> > wrote: > > > Yang, > > > > This might not be such a tough choice on engineering side - one of > > the LLVM differentiators is the ground-up, early introduced support > > for VLIW specific features. > > Actually, LLVM lacked support for VLIW until fairly recently, and it > has relatively few VLIW-specific features. > > Dan
Yes, I can see that. Thank you, Sergei, for the great work. Regards. 2012/8/13 Sergei Larin <slarin at codeaurora.org>:> But we are really striving to change it fast :) > > Dan, > > My comparative point was that LLVM has a greater potential to accommodate > VLIW going forward than GCC does at this point. > Would you agree to that? > > Sergei > > -- > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum. > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dan Gohman [mailto:gohman at apple.com] >> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 12:30 PM >> To: Sergei Larin >> Cc: 'Triple Yang'; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu >> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] VLIW code generation for LLVM backend >> >> >> On Aug 9, 2012, at 10:09 AM, Sergei Larin <slarin at codeaurora.org> >> wrote: >> >> > Yang, >> > >> > This might not be such a tough choice on engineering side - one of >> > the LLVM differentiators is the ground-up, early introduced support >> > for VLIW specific features. >> >> Actually, LLVM lacked support for VLIW until fairly recently, and it >> has relatively few VLIW-specific features. >> >> Dan > >-- 杨勇勇 (Yang Yongyong)