search for: striving

Proposed alternative DRAFT -------------------------- LLVM Code of Conduct (LCoC) Prologue: LLVM community as a whole strives for equality and respect in all areas. With this in mind, we want to establish a few words that help(s)? everyone understand what to do if there is ever questions or conflicts. Motto: Be respectful, have fun and do great engineering. LLVM Community members: People in

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:19:09PM +0800, Pan Xinhui wrote: > Hi, Peter. > I think we can avoid a function call in a simpler way. How about below > > static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu) > { > /* only set in pv case*/ > if (pv_lock_ops.vcpu_is_preempted) > return pv_lock_ops.vcpu_is_preempted(cpu); > return false; > } That is still more expensive. It

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:19:09PM +0800, Pan Xinhui wrote: > Hi, Peter. > I think we can avoid a function call in a simpler way. How about below > > static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu) > { > /* only set in pv case*/ > if (pv_lock_ops.vcpu_is_preempted) > return pv_lock_ops.vcpu_is_preempted(cpu); > return false; > } That is still more expensive. It

Hello all, LLVM-TAPI seeks to decouple the necessary link-time information for a dynamic shared object from the implementation of the runtime object. This process will be referred to as dynamic shared object (DSO) stubbing throughout this proposal. A number of projects have implemented their own versions of shared object stubbing for a variety of reasons related to improving the overall linking

On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:40 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote: > On 07/14/2013 12:49 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > This is also why the Intel manuals point out that "some assemblers" can > take things like: > > bt[l] $63,(%rsi) > > ... and turn it into: > > btl $31,4(%rsi) > > This is definitely the friendly thing to

Hello various people, A few LLVM folk are in town for the ARM researchers gathering towards the end of the week and we discussed briefly the idea of having a small pub outing for them this week. It looks as if Wednesday is the best day, so let’s aim to go back to the Fort St George[1]. The weather is supposed to be warm again this week (though I’m sure Renato will strive to organise rain for

...quot;30" <sp:30 at my_public_ip:5060> failed for '192.168.xxx.xxx:6373' - Wrong Password? ?and there are approx 10 request per minute of this type. Please suggest some way to stop this.? -- Anurag Rana http://newbie42.blogspot.in/ On the trampoline of life's experiences, Striving towards a saintly life in the midst of these materialistic turbulences. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20140627/d51df768/attachment.html>

Hi all, Currently I'm looking for users of the --keep-foreign-metadata feature of FLAC. There has been some improvement of this feature in FLAC 1.4.0. Since 2007 there has been a warning in FLAC that --keep-foreign-metadata is a new feature. I think removal of this warning is long overdue, but there are still some issues surrounding it. So, if there are users of this feature on the mailing

The coding guidelines say: > Function names should be verb phrases (as they represent actions), and command-like function should be imperative. The name should be camel case, and start with a lower case letter (e.g. openFile() or isFoo()). This means that functions that just compute or access a value (no side-effects) should be named e.g. `getParent()`, rather than `parent()` as they are in

Le 09/10/2017 ? 13:14, Nux! a ?crit : > I personally dislike Facebook, but even so, I think a basic > requirement for any web site striving to share knowledge is to be > publicly accessible to all which at the moment it is not. Search > engines won't be able to crawl it, people without an account won't be > able to access it. > > Can this be changed? Facebook is what it is, and as far as I'm concerned, I us...

Hello, Researchers at Oregon State University are striving to conduct research to learn more about the free/open source software community landscape as it relates to older adults. We have identified you as a leader for a free/open source software community. If you?re interested, we will either do an in-person interview (if you are local to the Corvallis or...

Since the goal is to start llvm-tapi more or less from scratch, I feel the best approach initially is to focus on the structure as a key point of feedback in initial reviews. Once the foundations are set, integrating Mach-O TAPI in parallel with the ELF implementation should be relatively straightforward. The features outside of stubbing aren't as appealing for ELF, so I probably won't be

...es are loaded, the phone did a firmware upgrade. But it doesn't seems that the configuration file is loaded. Is it necessary to define on any place something that the phone use the config-file via tftp? Best regards, Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." -- Rich Cook

On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 10:08:26PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 10:48:13PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: >> The list of packages is something I will have to go through anyway, >> for not it is just a list taken from libvirt CI container with bunch >> of things added for libnbd. > >Ideally it should be driven from ”dnf builddep libnbd”,

Absolutely. The goal of the tool is to produce both textual and binary DSO stubs. This means you could take a DSO, produce a textual stub, modify it however you wish, and then produce a linkable binary stub from that modified .tbe. That, or you could bypass the textual portion altogether and just produce binary stubs from DSOs. While the textual format is useful, the goal is to make the tool

Hear ye! Hear ye! This is a call for testers for the 3.3 release!!! What's Expected --------------- You might be asking yourself, "Self, I would like to be an LLVM tester for the 3.3 release, but I don't know what's involved in being one." Well, ask yourself no more! Not only do I have the answers for you, but talking to yourself will cause people to avoid you. Here's

Hello all, GSOC is around the corner, and the LLVM projects plans to participate again this year. For those who don’t know about GSOC, students are proposing a project that they will work on for 3 months. Amongst other, one goal for LLVM is to mentor students to become good developers and also contributors to the LLVM project (or user/advocate of LLVM for building other cool projects). A key

On Aug 9, 2012, at 10:09 AM, Sergei Larin <slarin at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Yang, > > This might not be such a tough choice on engineering side - one of the > LLVM differentiators is the ground-up, early introduced support for VLIW > specific features… Actually, LLVM lacked support for VLIW until fairly recently, and it has relatively few VLIW-specific features. Dan

But we are really striving to change it fast :) Dan, My comparative point was that LLVM has a greater potential to accommodate VLIW going forward than GCC does at this point. Would you agree to that? Sergei -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum. > -----Original Message----- > Fro...

Hi Jose, Am 11.10.2017 um 13:13 schrieb Jose Celestino: >> Before I go down the route of upgrading our main Solr instance from 6 to 7, >> just checking if anyone is using Solr 7 with Dovecot. > SOLR 7 works ok with dovecot. We did not upgrade but indexed from scratch with > 7.0.0. > > From our experience: > > Make sure that you set the default queryResponseWriter to