Hello,> You might grab some information from > http://llvm.org/devmtg/2012-04-12/Slides/Workshops/Anton_Korobeynikov.pdf > and around.On Page 56 it says: Maybe it’s a good idea to add ‘stub’ backend to the tree Are there any plans to this? I'd like to see a 'stub' backend in the llvm-tree (or somewhere else). -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120710/e985c5f4/attachment.sig>
> Maybe it’s a good idea to add ‘stub’ backend to the tree > > Are there any plans to this? > I'd like to see a 'stub' backend in the llvm-tree (or somewhere else).Well, I asked on the list previously, but noone ever responded.... -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
For the record, I think this would be a great idea, and I'm willing to help, but I don't currently have time to be the primary author. -Hal Sent from my Verizon Wireless Droid -----Original message----- From: Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> To: Stephan Hilb <stephan at ecshi.net> Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Sent: Tue, Jul 10, 2012 21:50:21 GMT+00:00 Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] New backend> Maybe it’s a good idea to add ‘stub’ backend to the tree > > Are there any plans to this? > I'd like to see a 'stub' backend in the llvm-tree (or somewhere else).Well, I asked on the list previously, but noone ever responded.... -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University _______________________________________________ LLVM Developers mailing list LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120710/51269229/attachment.html>
On Jul 10, 2012, at 2:48 PM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote:>> Maybe it’s a good idea to add ‘stub’ backend to the tree >> >> Are there any plans to this? >> I'd like to see a 'stub' backend in the llvm-tree (or somewhere else). > Well, I asked on the list previously, but noone ever responded….Don't targets like MSP430 and MBlaze serve as good stubs? /jakob
FWIW, I think a stub backend would be enormously useful.> This document is heavily out of date (so, I think it should be removed > / marked obsolete).This is very unfortunate. Are there plans to correct the situation? "building a backend" is a pretty important piece of documentation for a compiler framework and deserves to be kept up to date. --Sean Silva On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote:>> Maybe it’s a good idea to add ‘stub’ backend to the tree >> >> Are there any plans to this? >> I'd like to see a 'stub' backend in the llvm-tree (or somewhere else). > Well, I asked on the list previously, but noone ever responded.... > > -- > With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov > Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev