llvm dev - Sep 2011 - [LLVMdev] SAFECode and CMake?

Are there any plans to add CMake support to the build of 
SAFECode? Also are there any current instructions for building
llvm/clang with SAFECode support from current svn?
                 Jack

On 9/9/11 1:08 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>     Are there any plans to add CMake support to the build of
> SAFECode?
No, there are no current plans to do so.  Is not having CMake support a 
show-stopper for you?  I imagine adding support for it would be 
straightforward.
>   Also are there any current instructions for building
> llvm/clang with SAFECode support from current svn?
Yes.  Directions can be found at 
http://sva.cs.illinois.edu/docs/Install.html#svn.

Note that it is possible for mainline SAFECode and mainline LLVM/Clang 
to get out-of-sync since LLVM is currently under active development for 
the LLVM 3.0 release.  If you run into a problem like that, please let 
me know.

FWIW, I usually svn up LLVM and merge in mainline clang about once a day 
during the week (typically in the mornings) to make sure we're tracking 
mainline LLVM/Clang.

-- John T.
>                   Jack
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 01:25:10PM -0500, John Criswell
wrote:
> On 9/9/11 1:08 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>     Are there any plans to add CMake support to the build of
>> SAFECode?
>
> No, there are no current plans to do so.  Is not having CMake support a  
> show-stopper for you?  I imagine adding support for it would be  
> straightforward.
   The fink llvm29/llvm29 packaging is based on the cmake build approach.
It has been unclear if the addition of cmake build support to llvm suggested
that approach was now favored over the simple configure build method.
>
>>   Also are there any current instructions for building
>> llvm/clang with SAFECode support from current svn?
>
> Yes.  Directions can be found at  
> http://sva.cs.illinois.edu/docs/Install.html#svn.
>
> Note that it is possible for mainline SAFECode and mainline LLVM/Clang  
> to get out-of-sync since LLVM is currently under active development for  
> the LLVM 3.0 release.  If you run into a problem like that, please let  
> me know.
>
> FWIW, I usually svn up LLVM and merge in mainline clang about once a day  
> during the week (typically in the mornings) to make sure we're tracking
> mainline LLVM/Clang.
>
> -- John T.
>
>>                   Jack
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev