Wednesday August 31 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:50PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] What's a good forum for discussing compiler design? |
9:47PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM Bay-Area Social! |
9:29PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gfortran problems |
9:14PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] A pass to minimize instruction bitwidth? |
9:02PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gfortran problems |
8:48PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gfortran problems |
8:32PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Getting rid of phi instructions? |
7:52PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ARMCodeEmitter.cpp JIT support very broken (2.9 and svn) |
7:00PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] StructTypes in module |
6:35PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] StructTypes in module |
6:11PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to place call(s) to functions found in other llvm modules ??? |
5:54PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to place call(s) to functions found in other llvm modules ??? |
5:23PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] StructTypes in module |
5:18PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to place call(s) to functions found in other llvm modules ??? |
5:00PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to place call(s) to functions found in other llvm modules ??? |
4:30PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] cortex-m{3,4} special registers |
4:07PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Internal API Changes |
3:56PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Split init.trampoline into init.trampoline & adjust.trampoline |
3:23PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Trouble using the MCJIT: "Target does not support MC emission" error |
9:43AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Getting rid of phi instructions? |
9:35AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Getting rid of phi instructions? |
8:51AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Trouble using the MCJIT: "Target does not support MC emission" error |
8:41AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Getting rid of phi instructions? |
8:06AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Getting rid of phi instructions? |
7:28AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] FP Stack overflow with inline asm |
7:12AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ARMCodeEmitter.cpp JIT support very broken (2.9 and svn) |
5:25AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Branch transformation with branch-weight metadata |
1:06AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ARMCodeEmitter.cpp JIT support very broken (2.9 and svn) |
|
Tuesday August 30 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
9:54PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] ARMCodeEmitter.cpp JIT support very broken (2.9 and svn) |
9:44PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ARMCodeEmitter.cpp JIT support very broken (2.9 and svn) |
9:01PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] ARMCodeEmitter.cpp JIT support very broken (2.9 and svn) |
8:12PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ARMCodeEmitter.cpp JIT support very broken (2.9 and svn) |
7:51PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] ARMCodeEmitter.cpp JIT support very broken (2.9 and svn) |
5:15PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] cortex-m{3,4} special registers |
4:19PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Getting rid of phi instructions? |
4:12PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Getting rid of phi instructions? |
3:10PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] compare two GEP instructions operand by operand |
10:47AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] debugging LLVM-JITted code |
8:28AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Fix typo in MSP430MCTargetDesc.h |
8:14AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Fix typo in MSP430MCTargetDesc.h |
7:26AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Fix typo in MSP430MCTargetDesc.h |
4:59AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Fix typo in SPUMCTargetDesc.h |
4:55AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Fix typo in BlackfinFrameLowering.h |
4:49AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Fix typo in MSP430MCTargetDesc.h |
2:35AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Fix typo in MipsMCTargetDesc.h |
2:13AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] exp2 and log2 intrinsic expansion |
|
Monday August 29 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:25PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] insertions with inst_iterators? |
11:20PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] insertions with inst_iterators? |
9:41PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Split init.trampoline into init.trampoline & adjust.trampoline |
9:40PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] ARM issue: Trying to add an operand to a machine instr that is already done! |
9:36PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ARM issue: Trying to add an operand to a machine instr that is already done! |
9:33PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] ARM issue: Trying to add an operand to a machine instr that is already done! |
8:57PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] State of the Java frontend |
7:59PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] insertions with inst_iterators? |
7:52PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] insertions with inst_iterators? |
7:38PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] insertions with inst_iterators? |
7:11PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] State of the Java frontend |
7:02PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VMKit Development |
6:58PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] VMKit Development |
5:11PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] State of the Java frontend |
5:06PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] cortex-m{3,4} special registers |
4:03PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Segmented Stacks (Re-Roll 2) |
11:43AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] PTX target for LLVM! |
4:21AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] svnsync of llvm tree |
|
Sunday August 28 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:41PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM supports Unicode? |
10:08PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Which level of LLVM integration with native code, like DLLs? |
9:49PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Which level of LLVM integration with native code, like DLLs? |
8:02PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] cortex-m{3,4} special registers |
6:55PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM supports Unicode? |
6:02PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM supports Unicode? |
5:44PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM supports Unicode? |
2:16PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM supports Unicode? |
2:02PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM supports Unicode? |
1:59PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM supports Unicode? |
1:08PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM supports Unicode? |
8:14AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM supports Unicode? |
6:30AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to break/iterate over nested instructions. |
2:53AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM supports Unicode? |
2:33AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM supports Unicode? |
|
Saturday August 27 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
8:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM supports Unicode? |
8:31PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] How to break/iterate over nested instructions. |
2:36PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] caller-saved register saving |
1:38PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM supports Unicode? |
11:32AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] OpenCL Backend |
10:10AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] JVM bytecode generation vs. LLVM |
9:42AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] OpenCL Backend |
8:56AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] OpenCL Backend |
7:57AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VMKit Development |
7:41AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to break/iterate over nested instructions. |
3:13AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] VMKit Development |
1:34AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to break/iterate over nested instructions. |
12:52AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM compatible with AMD? |
|
Friday August 26 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:07PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Segmented Stacks (Re-Roll 2) |
7:51PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Why BinaryOperator::Create requires same argument types for shifts? |
6:40PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How much adaptable is the LLVM to POSIX pattern? |
6:30PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Segmented Stacks (Re-Roll 2) |
6:18PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM compatible with AMD? |
4:52PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Dead node removal in DAGCombiner |
4:07PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VMKit Development |
2:33PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM compatible with AMD? |
2:23PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Dynamically allocate and free variables in stack |
12:32PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Why BinaryOperator::Create requires same argument types for shifts? |
11:46AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Why BinaryOperator::Create requires same argument types for shifts? |
10:00AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] VMKit Development |
8:21AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VMKit Development |
7:04AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Trouble using the MCJIT: "Target does not support MC emission" error |
6:58AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Trouble using the MCJIT: "Target does not support MC emission" error |
6:34AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Build breaks in lib/CodeGen |
1:21AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Dead node removal in DAGCombiner |
12:58AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Changes to Debian's linker object files breaks building LLVM [crti.o, crt1.o, crtn.o] |
|
Thursday August 25 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:17PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] AVX spill alignment |
11:08PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] VMKit Development |
8:22PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VMKit build error |
7:14PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Splitting init.trampoline into init.trampoline and adjust.trampoline |
5:32PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Trouble using the MCJIT: "Target does not support MC emission" error |
5:12PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Trouble using the MCJIT: "Target does not support MC emission" error |
12:35PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Support Target with no register,register operations |
11:39AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] updating |
11:16AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Trouble using the MCJIT: "Target does not support MC emission" error |
7:40AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VMKit Development |
4:41AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Segmented Stacks (Re-Roll 2) |
3:57AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Changes to Debian's linker object files breaks building LLVM [crti.o, crt1.o, crtn.o] |
2:15AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Changes to Debian's linker object files breaks building LLVM [crti.o, crt1.o, crtn.o] |
2:12AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] VMKit Development |
1:36AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Changes to Debian's linker object files breaks building LLVM [crti.o, crt1.o, crtn.o] |
|
Wednesday August 24 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
7:07PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Assert on Large Zeroinitializer Store |
6:51PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Assert on Large Zeroinitializer Store |
6:41PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Assert on Large Zeroinitializer Store |
4:40PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Update git Document |
4:38PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] git Status |
2:49PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] VMKit build error |
1:14PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] git Status |
9:01AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VMKit build error |
8:50AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] profile.pl |
8:30AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] proposal: add macro expansion of for-loop to TableGen |
8:07AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] run function pass conditionally |
6:19AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] v3.0 type system rewrite question |
5:58AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] lli interpreter fails to execute external functions |
5:36AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VMKit Development |
3:18AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Best place to implement support for a custom binary format? |
1:52AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Segmented Stacks (re-roll) |
12:51AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] VMKit Development |
|
Tuesday August 23 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:16PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] VMKit build error |
10:49PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VMKit build error |
10:17PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] VMKit build error |
7:19PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] git Status |
6:15PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] git Status |
6:08PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Segmented Stacks (re-roll) |
4:24PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Segmented Stacks (re-roll) |
4:20PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] git Status |
4:15PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] git Status |
3:47PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] git Status |
3:38PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] git Status |
3:25PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] write IR on file |
3:24PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] git Status |
2:51PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ShadowStackGC.cpp - More Dead Code? |
10:10AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Undefined references when LLVM is configured with "--host=x86_64-gnu-linux --target=x86_64-w64-mingw32" |
8:04AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ModulePass not run |
7:56AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] git Status |
7:44AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] git Status |
7:35AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] git Status |
7:22AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] git Status |
7:21AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] git Status |
4:08AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM Concurrency and Undef |
12:53AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Splitting init.trampoline into init.trampoline and adjust.trampoline |
12:46AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM Concurrency and Undef |
12:29AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM Concurrency and Undef |
12:25AM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] git Status |
12:22AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM Concurrency and Undef |
12:06AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Generating EXE with LLVM |
|
Monday August 22 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:35PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM Concurrency and Undef |
11:27PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM Concurrency and Undef |
11:20PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM Concurrency and Undef |
11:12PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc and -march |
11:03PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc and -march |
10:59PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc and -march |
10:49PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM Concurrency and Undef |
10:40PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM Concurrency and Undef |
10:08PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM Concurrency and Undef |
10:08PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc and -march |
10:03PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Infinite loop when adding a new analysis pass |
9:49PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM Concurrency and Undef |
9:46PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc and -march |
9:44PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc and -march |
9:39PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc and -march |
9:34PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc and -march |
9:24PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Segmented Stacks (re-roll) |
8:37PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] git Status |
8:24PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Reviving the new LLVM concurrency model |
8:09PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Reviving the new LLVM concurrency model |
7:02PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Reviving the new LLVM concurrency model |
6:17PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Reviving the new LLVM concurrency model |
5:50PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-fpga microblaze target |
5:02PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Reviving the new LLVM concurrency model |
4:55PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Reviving the new LLVM concurrency model |
3:08PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Undefined references when LLVM is configured with "--host=x86_64-gnu-linux --target=x86_64-w64-mingw32" |
1:48PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Internal API Changes |
10:26AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Accessing arguments in a caller |
10:08AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Accessing arguments in a caller |
9:53AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Accessing arguments in a caller |
9:29AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Accessing arguments in a caller |
5:31AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Linking header files in CLANG |
|
Sunday August 21 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:37PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Clang + SAFECode Release Announcement |
7:35PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Accessing arguments in a caller |
5:31PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Accessing arguments in a caller |
2:26PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Clang + SAFECode Release Announcement |
2:19PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Undefined references when LLVM is configured with "--host=x86_64-gnu-linux --target=x86_64-w64-mingw32" |
1:23PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Accessing arguments in a caller |
9:17AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] ShadowStackGC.cpp - More Dead Code? |
6:31AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Lying about being expanded? |
4:27AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Xilinx zynq-7000 (7030) as a Gallium3D LLVM FPGA target |
12:13AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Xilinx zynq-7000 (7030) as a Gallium3D LLVM FPGA target |
|
Saturday August 20 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:48PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Xilinx zynq-7000 (7030) as a Gallium3D LLVM FPGA target |
10:37PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Xilinx zynq-7000 (7030) as a Gallium3D LLVM FPGA target |
5:15PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [polly] r138203 - /polly/trunk/lib/Support/GICHelper.cpp |
12:36AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] 2011 LLVM Developers' Meeting Announcement & Call for Speakers! |
|
Friday August 19 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:06PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM ERROR: Cannot select error in simple i128 math? |
10:00PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] running a module pass via opt on multiple bitcode files |
9:53PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] git Status |
9:36PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] git Status |
9:36PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] running a module pass via opt on multiple bitcode files |
8:59PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM ERROR: Cannot select error in simple i128 math? |
8:41PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] git Status |
5:58PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Break operands into multiple instructions |
3:00PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM: Very simple question |
2:08PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] git Status |
1:22PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Why int variable get promoted to i64 |
12:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to halt a program |
12:27PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to halt a program |
12:16PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Why int variable get promoted to i64 |
9:32AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Why int variable get promoted to i64 |
8:15AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] git Status |
6:57AM |
11 |
[LLVMdev] git Status |
6:22AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] git Status |
5:39AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] building LLVM for i386 under snow leopard |
2:55AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] building LLVM for i386 under snow leopard |
|
Thursday August 18 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:56PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] tools to debug human readable llvm assembly bc code? |
11:47PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] tools to debug human readable llvm assembly bc code? |
11:39PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] tools to debug human readable llvm assembly bc code? |
7:53PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Go on dragonegg |
6:53PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] AMDIL Target Triple patch |
5:57PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] git Status |
5:29PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM Compiler Engineer Position @ AMD |
4:56PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] parsing windows.h in llvm clang |
3:17PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Clang + SAFECode Release Announcement |
3:06PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Go on dragonegg |
2:56PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] Clang + SAFECode Release Announcement |
7:11AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Accessing arguments in a caller |
5:45AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VMKit Development |
5:13AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Is va_arg deprecated? |
4:06AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Style question: NULL or 0? |
1:42AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] VMKit Development |
12:46AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Segfault calling LLVM libs from a clang-compiled executable |
12:23AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Style question: NULL or 0? |
12:22AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Style question: NULL or 0? |
|
Wednesday August 17 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:41PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Style question: NULL or 0? |
10:08PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is va_arg deprecated? |
10:02PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Is va_arg deprecated? |
8:47PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] svnsync of llvm tree |
8:04PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] liveness question |
7:46PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] liveness question |
7:42PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Correct documentation |
7:41PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is va_arg deprecated? |
7:41PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] webgl demo created with clang and llvm released |
7:38PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Segmented Stacks (re-roll) |
7:29PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Go on dragonegg |
6:54PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] liveness question |
6:53PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Is va_arg deprecated? |
6:36PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] svnsync of llvm tree |
6:22PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Non "folding" Stack Allocation |
4:47PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] svnsync of llvm tree |
3:29PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] AMDIL Target Triple patch |
12:26PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] --enable-shared doesn't build shared library any more |
12:02PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Non "folding" Stack Allocation |
11:00AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] .so file creation for new passes on Visual Studio |
7:06AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Segmented Stacks: Pre-midterm work |
5:44AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Question on instruction itineraries |
3:34AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] svnsync of llvm tree |
1:13AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] .so file creation for new passes on Visual Studio |
|
Tuesday August 16 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:27PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] --enable-shared doesn't build shared library any more |
11:07PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Missing metadata for volatile variables |
10:54PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Question on instruction itineraries |
10:09PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Problem I have to run a llvm module pass from main function |
9:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Back ends for instructional use? |
9:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-poolalloc DSA patch: code cleanups and thread safety |
9:23PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Segmented Stacks: Pre-midterm work |
4:44PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Tying an instruction to a specific set of registers |
4:33PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Tying an instruction to a specific set of registers |
4:18PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Tying an instruction to a specific set of registers |
3:25PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llc with -march=mips failed to compile va_start()/va_end()/va_arg() (RESOLVED) |
1:39PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Segmented Stacks: Pre-midterm work |
9:08AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Register Pressure Computation during Pre-Allocation Scheduling |
8:59AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] not able to run pass on visual studio 2010 |
7:06AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Segmented Stacks: Pre-midterm work |
5:06AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] .so file creation for new passes on Visual Studio |
1:07AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.9 tag? |
1:04AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.9 tag? |
|
Monday August 15 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:14PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] function live in info |
11:11PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] DIBuilder interface change |
11:03PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Question on instruction itineraries |
9:52PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Register Pressure Computation during Pre-Allocation Scheduling |
8:54PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Mips target instruction set |
8:19PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Segmented Stacks: Pre-midterm work |
8:02PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Segmented Stacks: Pre-midterm work |
7:45PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Order of code generation |
6:40PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Back ends for instructional use? |
6:38PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Back ends for instructional use? |
6:20PM |
8 |
[LLVMdev] Back ends for instructional use? |
5:52PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] llc with -march=mips failed to compile va_start()/va_end()/va_arg() |
5:09PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Cuda programs on LLVM |
4:46PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] structured types as function arguments |
4:42PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llc with -march=mips failed to compile va_start()/va_end()/va_arg() |
4:01PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] structured types as function arguments |
12:43PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Order of code generation |
11:12AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Order of code generation |
9:20AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Cuda programs on LLVM |
9:18AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] llc with -march=mips failed to compile va_start()/va_end()/va_arg() |
8:27AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Register Pressure Computation during Pre-Allocation Scheduling |
2:17AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [VMKit] 2.9 or ToT? Java version/features? |
1:44AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.9 64bits on Visual Studio 9 |
|
Sunday August 14 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
5:17PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] threaded llvm |
5:05PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] associating id with opcodes |
8:20AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] invoke unwind instruction support in 2.9 |
8:16AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] associating id with opcodes |
|
Saturday August 13 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:44PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] invoke unwind instruction support in 2.9 |
11:38PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] patch: CloneModule resets GlobalVariable address space |
6:04PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] associating id with opcodes |
4:22PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Issues with LLVM 2.9 Win64 |
5:50AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Order of code generation |
1:00AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How well does clang perform with ARMv4? |
|
Friday August 12 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:01PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Order of code generation |
9:59PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Order of code generation |
6:11PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Minor API change coming |
5:33PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] New ARM disassembler - unpredictable instructions |
12:33PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Forgotten remains in LoopIterator.h |
11:13AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] link missing for type based alias analysis |
8:55AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Using sret AND thiscall calling convention |
8:11AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Using sret AND thiscall calling convention |
7:26AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Segmented Stacks: Breaking libgcc compatibility |
|
Thursday August 11 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:22PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] incorrect DSCallGraph for simple indirect call with vtable nearby |
9:51PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Segmented Stacks: Breaking libgcc compatibility |
7:47PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] nsw/nuw for trunc |
6:32PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] nsw/nuw for trunc |
6:03PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] nsw/nuw for trunc |
5:58PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] nsw/nuw for trunc |
5:41PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] type system rewrite terminology |
5:34PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] nsw/nuw for trunc |
5:31PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] type system rewrite terminology |
5:05PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] New ARM disassembler - unpredictable instructions |
4:43PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] EQTDDataStructures omits obvious, direct callee from DSCallGraph |
4:10PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] incorrect DSCallGraph for simple indirect call with vtable nearby |
3:40PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] incorrect DSCallGraph for simple indirect call with vtable nearby |
2:31PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] nsw/nuw for trunc |
2:17PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Pass a struct on windows |
1:56PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] nsw/nuw for trunc |
12:31PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RE : IR code modification/transformation |
12:22PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.9 64bits on Visual Studio 9 |
12:17PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] nsw/nuw for trunc |
12:06PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Instruction Insertion |
11:55AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Pass a struct on windows |
11:24AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Pass a struct on windows |
10:11AM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] IR code modification/transformation |
8:32AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] New ARM disassembler - unpredictable instructions |
4:44AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] EQTDDataStructures omits obvious, direct callee from DSCallGraph |
4:21AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] incorrect DSCallGraph for simple indirect call with vtable nearby |
|
Wednesday August 10 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
6:39PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] incorrect DSCallGraph for simple indirect call with vtable nearby |
6:34PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Experimental fixes to CBackend |
6:26PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] How to emit a simple stream of machine code. |
5:59PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] incorrect DSCallGraph for simple indirect call with vtable nearby |
5:17PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] incorrect DSCallGraph for simple indirect call with vtable nearby |
4:13PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Handling of pointer difference in llvm-gcc and clang |
3:37PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] incorrect DSCallGraph for simple indirect call with vtable nearby |
3:03PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Segmented Stacks: Pre-midterm work |
2:37PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Handling of pointer difference in llvm-gcc and clang |
9:21AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Mips target instruction set |
6:40AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] extracting sub-program using specified top level function name |
6:38AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] (no subject) |
3:45AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] EQTDDataStructures omits obvious, direct callee from DSCallGraph |
|
Tuesday August 9 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:46PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] profile.pl |
11:41PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] EQTDDataStructures omits obvious, direct callee from DSCallGraph |
11:40PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Proposal for better assertions in LLVM |
11:19PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] EQTDDataStructures omits obvious, direct callee from DSCallGraph |
9:08PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc with static libraries |
8:59PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Proposal for better assertions in LLVM |
8:28PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Debug information for llvm-clang |
7:12PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc with static libraries |
7:03PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc with static libraries |
6:59PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Adding a module in a pass |
6:33PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc with static libraries |
6:16PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc with static libraries |
6:08PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] sys::getHostTriple failed to recognize ARM correctly |
4:15PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Adding a module in a pass |
2:48PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Adding a module in a pass |
1:49PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Adding a module in a pass |
5:46AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Proposal for better assertions in LLVM |
2:28AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] sys::getHostTriple failed to recognize ARM correctly |
1:53AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] sys::getHostTriple failed to recognize ARM correctly |
1:29AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] sys::getHostTriple failed to recognize ARM correctly |
1:27AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] sys::getHostTriple failed to recognize ARM correctly |
|
Monday August 8 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:24PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] sys::getHostTriple failed to recognize ARM correctly |
7:13PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Order of code generation |
5:36PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Euro-LLVM 2011 - Schedule + Details |
12:30PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] GPU compiler engineer at ARM, Cambridge, UK |
4:15AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Temporary register subscript |
4:01AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Temporary register subscript |
|
Sunday August 7 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
8:58PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc near tip causing crash in /usr/bin/ld due to memory corruption on linux x86_64 |
9:41AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] profile.pl |
8:56AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc near tip causing crash in /usr/bin/ld due to memory corruption on linux x86_64 |
|
Saturday August 6 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:05PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc near tip causing crash in /usr/bin/ld due to memory corruption on linux x86_64 |
9:42AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to differ from read and write operations for general stack objects |
6:40AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Order of code generation |
6:26AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] C Library problem in Debian |
|
Friday August 5 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:06PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Need advice on fixing my static roots pass |
8:43PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: Exception Handling Rewrite |
7:51PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Building LLVM on Solaris/Sparc |
6:06PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: Exception Handling Rewrite |
5:57PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: Exception Handling Rewrite |
5:57PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: Exception Handling Rewrite |
5:33PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Experimental fixes to CBackend |
2:57PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Experimental fixes to CBackend |
8:39AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Undefined reference cross-compiling shared llvm/clang for mingw |
5:01AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] (no subject) |
2:51AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] PARSEC benchmarks for LLVM test-suite |
12:11AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: Exception Handling Rewrite |
|
Thursday August 4 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:24PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: Exception Handling Rewrite |
11:16PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: Exception Handling Rewrite |
11:04PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: Exception Handling Rewrite |
11:03PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: Exception Handling Rewrite |
10:20PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVMdev Digest, Vol 86, Issue 5 |
9:58PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVMdev Digest, Vol 86, Issue 5 |
9:38PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVMdev Digest, Vol 86, Issue 5 |
9:03PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVMdev Digest, Vol 86, Issue 5 |
8:06PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Coroutines |
7:57PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Tracing Value Dependency Chains |
7:45PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Tracing Value Dependency Chains |
7:15PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Performance benchmarks available? |
7:14PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Tracing Value Dependency Chains |
6:53PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Tracing Value Dependency Chains |
6:44PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Merging PARSEC into the test suite |
6:42PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] metadata linking bug or by design |
6:35PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Performance benchmarks available? |
6:30PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] metadata linking bug or by design |
5:55PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Multiple one-line bugs in LLVM |
5:39PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Performance benchmarks available? |
5:22PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] metadata linking bug or by design |
5:06PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM backend: Treat some function calls specially |
4:56PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM backend: Treat some function calls specially |
4:03PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Multiple one-line bugs in LLVM |
3:21PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] metadata linking bug or by design |
10:50AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Multiple one-line bugs in LLVM |
9:29AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Customizing Passes |
7:11AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Make LLVM ARM JIT well-formed |
3:37AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Make LLVM ARM JIT well-formed |
|
Wednesday August 3 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:19PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] dragonegg and alias attribute |
11:13PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Building LLVM on Solaris/Sparc |
9:32PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LowerSetJmp Dead? |
8:37PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] dwarf directory table and file table |
5:47PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Tracing Value Dependency Chains |
1:43PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Unisys Compiler--LLVM |
9:43AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Help !! Problem about Intrinsic::returnaddress and optimization |
9:33AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] scalar evolution to determine access functions in arays |
9:26AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] scalar evolution to determine access functions in arays |
9:22AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] scalar evolution to determine access functions in arays |
7:36AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] scalar evolution to determine access functions in arays |
7:35AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] scalar evolution to determine access functions in arays |
3:02AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] dwarf directory table and file table |
1:56AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] dwarf directory table and file table |
12:21AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] scalar evolution to determine access functions in arays |
|
Tuesday August 2 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:43PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: Exception Handling Rewrite |
8:16PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Multiple successors, single dynamic successor |
8:01PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Multiple successors, single dynamic successor |
6:49PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] "icmp sgt" when it should be "ugt" ? |
6:12PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Building LLVM on Solaris/Sparc |
6:02PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Multiple successors, single dynamic successor |
5:46PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Grabbing Result of an Instruction. |
5:28PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: Exception Handling Rewrite |
5:20PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: Exception Handling Rewrite |
5:14PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm bugzilla broken? |
4:22PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Multiple successors, single dynamic successor |
3:53PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] "icmp sgt" when it should be "ugt" ? |
3:27PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] "icmp sgt" when it should be "ugt" ? |
2:43PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Grabbing Result of an Instruction. |
11:02AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Undefined reference cross-compiling shared llvm/clang for mingw |
10:47AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] "icmp sgt" when it should be "ugt" ? |
6:13AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: Exception Handling Rewrite |
3:12AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-fs 0.0.0 |
12:36AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] clang: Manual unfolding doesn't match automatic unfolding |
12:34AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Grabbing Result of an Instruction. |
|
Monday August 1 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:53PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] implicit Pass Type dependencies between Analysis Pass and Transformation Pass |
11:27PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Grabbing Result of an Instruction. |
11:09PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] gcroot only in entry block? |
7:28PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Updating Users.html |
5:54PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] profile.pl |
5:16PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] profile.pl |
4:40PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] "icmp sgt" when it should be "ugt" ? |
4:11PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] "icmp sgt" when it should be "ugt" ? |
3:35PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Debugging information problem: code being reordered / debug point jumping around |
2:27PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Debugging information problem: code being reordered / debug point jumping around |
12:52PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] llvm 3.0 svn and cfi_* directives |
10:03AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] SwitchInst::addCase with BlockAddress |
8:58AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker |
8:01AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker |
6:13AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] SwitchInst::addCase with BlockAddress |
5:49AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Debugging information problem: code being reordered / debug point jumping around |
3:16AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Reviving the new LLVM concurrency model |
12:24AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Reviving the new LLVM concurrency model |
12:22AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Reviving the new LLVM concurrency model |