search for: llvm29

Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "llvm29".

Did you mean: llvm2.9
2011 May 23
2
[LLVMdev] Debug llc crash using bugpoint
Hi, What is the best way to debug an llc crash using bugpoint? I am getting the following crash that I would like to reduce llc: /home/vadve/aggarwa4/llvm29/llvm-2.9/lib/MC/MCAsmStreamer.cpp:273: virtual void<unnamed>::MCAsmStreamer::EmitLabel(llvm::MCSymbol*): Assertion `Symbol->isUndefined() && "Cannot define a symbol twice!"' failed. 0 llc 0x00000000013ae046 1 llc 0x00000000013ae5d4 2 libpthr...
2011 Dec 16
3
[LLVMdev] llvm/clang test failures on powerpc-darwin8
...le build/test log for the gcc46 bootstrap.) >> This consistency between different bootstraps of the release gives me >> some hope that g++-4.0.1 is yet usable. > > David, > Another alternative for darwin8 would be to bootstrap llvm/clang 3.0 using > the clang from the fink llvm29 package (since clang 2.9 should build fine against > gcc-4.0.1). > Jack Hi Jack, I never managed to successfully build llvm29 on powerpc-darwin8, after running into some build issues, and having filed bug 9958, I got the impression of ppc-darwin being "not supported"...
2011 May 23
0
[LLVMdev] Debug llc crash using bugpoint
...e file> --tool-args -- <llc arguments> Cameron On May 23, 2011, at 1:33 PM, Arushi Aggarwal wrote: > Hi, > > What is the best way to debug an llc crash using bugpoint? > > I am getting the following crash that I would like to reduce > > llc: /home/vadve/aggarwa4/llvm29/llvm-2.9/lib/MC/MCAsmStreamer.cpp:273: virtual void<unnamed>::MCAsmStreamer::EmitLabel(llvm::MCSymbol*): Assertion `Symbol->isUndefined() && "Cannot define a symbol twice!"' failed. > 0 llc 0x00000000013ae046 > 1 llc 0x00000000013ae5d4...
2011 Dec 16
0
[LLVMdev] llvm/clang test failures on powerpc-darwin8
...e gcc46 bootstrap.) >>> This consistency between different bootstraps of the release gives me >>> some hope that g++-4.0.1 is yet usable. >> >> David, >> Another alternative for darwin8 would be to bootstrap llvm/clang 3.0 using >> the clang from the fink llvm29 package (since clang 2.9 should build fine against >> gcc-4.0.1). >> Jack > > Hi Jack, > I never managed to successfully build llvm29 on powerpc-darwin8, after > running into some build issues, and having filed bug 9958, I got the > impression of ppc-darwin...
2011 Dec 16
0
[LLVMdev] llvm/clang test failures on powerpc-darwin8
...I no longer have the whole build/test log for the gcc46 bootstrap.) > This consistency between different bootstraps of the release gives me > some hope that g++-4.0.1 is yet usable. David, Another alternative for darwin8 would be to bootstrap llvm/clang 3.0 using the clang from the fink llvm29 package (since clang 2.9 should build fine against gcc-4.0.1). Jack > > I don't know how far diverged trunk is from the 3.0-branch, but there are > far fewer CodeGen test failures than with svn-trunk. Both trunk and > branch exhibit numerous PCH failures. Does this...
2011 Sep 09
0
[LLVMdev] SAFECode and CMake?
On 9/9/11 1:08 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > Are there any plans to add CMake support to the build of > SAFECode? No, there are no current plans to do so. Is not having CMake support a show-stopper for you? I imagine adding support for it would be straightforward. > Also are there any current instructions for building > llvm/clang with SAFECode support from current svn? Yes.
2011 Sep 09
2
[LLVMdev] SAFECode and CMake?
Are there any plans to add CMake support to the build of SAFECode? Also are there any current instructions for building llvm/clang with SAFECode support from current svn? Jack
2011 Dec 16
3
[LLVMdev] llvm/clang test failures on powerpc-darwin8
Hi, Thanks for the quick reply again. > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:17 PM, David Fang <fang at csl.cornell.edu> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've bootstrapped llvm/clang from svn-trunk on powerpc-darwin8 (g++-4.0.1), and >> have the following test results to share. >> Summary below, full log at: >>
2011 May 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.9 pass manager asserts "Unable to handle Pass that requires lower level Analysis pass"
...0; bool Pass1::runOnModule(Module &M) { M.dump(); return false; } static RegisterPass<Pass2> Y("pass2", "Phase 2"); char Pass2::ID = 0; bool Pass2::runOnModule (Module &M) { M.dump(); return false; } I hit the following assert opt: /home/vadve/aggarwa4/llvm29/llvm-2.9/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1613: virtual void llvm::MPPassManager::addLowerLevelRequiredPass(llvm::Pass*, llvm::Pass*): Assertion `(P->getPotentialPassManagerType() < RequiredPass->getPotentialPassManagerType()) && "Unable to handle Pass that requires lower level Anal...
2011 May 17
2
[LLVMdev] x86 cross compiler for ppc fails to build
...: --- /llvm-gcc-4.2-2.9.source/gcc/../include -I/local/maartenf/opt/src/all_llvm_2_9/buildroot_ppc/src/llvm-gcc-4.2-2.9.source/gcc/../libcpp/include -I/local/maartenf/opt/src/all_llvm_2_9/buildroot_ppc/src/llvm-gcc-4.2-2.9.source/gcc/../libdecnumber -I../libdecnumber -I/local/maartenf/opt/bin/llvm29/powerpc-linux/llvm/include -g0 -finhibit-size-directive -fno-inline-functions -fno-exceptions -fno-zero-initialized-in-bss -fno-toplevel-reorder -Dinhibit_libc -msdata=none \ -c /local/maartenf/opt/src/all_llvm_2_9/buildroot_ppc/src/llvm-gcc-4.2-2.9.source/gcc/crtstuff.c -DCRT_BEGIN...