search for: cmake

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4195 matches for "cmake".

Did you mean: make
2015 Jul 06
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] 3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged. Testers needed.
On 6 July 2015 at 10:34, Ben Pope <benpope81 at gmail.com> wrote: > On 7 July 2015 at 01:12, Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote: >> >> >> @Ben Pope: Your uploaded binary tarball is the odd one out. Any idea >> as to why the CMake files are missing and why the root directory name >> inside the tarball is not consistent with the uploaded tarballs for >> other platforms? >> >> [1] >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20150629/285597.html > > > Well, I rename the...
2016 Aug 17
2
RFC: Move cmake shared files
The cmake files generated when building LLVM (including LLVMConfig.cmake) are to support cmake's find_package() [1] function. In the build dir the generated files are placed in <build-dir>/share/llvm/cmake. After install, in <prefix>/lib/llvm/share/llvm/cmake. CMake is not able to find them...
2015 Jul 07
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] 3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged. Testers needed.
Hi Ben, Thanks for taking the time to look at this. >> It's not necessary for CMake to be installed when building with the >> Autoconf/Makefile build system. If you look in the build directory >> after a build has been performed you should see in cmake/modules >> >> ``` >> LLVMBuildExports.cmake LLVMConfig.cmake LLVMConfigVersion.cmake >> LL...
2010 Aug 02
6
[LLVMdev] CMake broken?
Hi all, CMake seems to have broken in the last few days - or is it just me? tcare:llvm-release tcare$ make -j4 -- Target triple: x86_64-apple-darwin10.5.0 -- Native target architecture is X86 -- Threads enabled. -- Building with -fPIC -- Targeting X86 CMake Error at cmake/modules/LLVMConfig.cmake:90 (message):...
2016 Apr 27
4
[cfe-dev] Fwd: Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3
> > Replicating ExternalProject would be a lot of work... > One approach commonly used with CMake modules that change frequently upstream is for the project to keep a local copy and have a check in place to use CMake's version if new enough. For instance, in llvm's source tree: cmake/modules/ExternalProject.cmake: if(CMAKE_VERSION VERSION_LESS "3.5.1") include(${PROJECT_SOU...
2015 Feb 09
6
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Raise minimum required CMake version to 3.0
It came up on another thread that our current minimum required CMake version 2.8.8, has some bugs that cause issues when building with MSVC + Ninja, and one potential solution was to raise the minimum required version of CMake. CMake 3.0 is now 6 months old and CMake 3.1 has been released. I would like to propose moving our minimum required CMake version to 3.0. I...
2019 Oct 29
7
RFC: Updating to CMake 3.15.0
At the LLVM Developer Meeting on October 23rd we held a CMake roundtable. One of the items we discussed was adopting a more regular timeline for CMake upgrades. During the roundtable there was overwhelming support for upgrading CMake, and support for treating CMake differently than how we treat upgrading host compilers. Historically we've taken into acco...
2015 Feb 24
4
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Raise minimum required CMake version to 3.0
On 24.02.2015 17:45, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 09.02.2015 20:12, Chris Bieneman wrote: >> It came up on another thread that our current minimum required CMake >> version 2.8.8, has some bugs that cause issues when building with MSVC >> + Ninja, and one potential solution was to raise the minimum required >> version of CMake. >> >> CMake 3.0 is now 6 months old and CMake 3.1 has been released. I would >> like to propose...
2020 Mar 25
3
Bumping the CMake requirement for libc++ and libc++abi
...; > > > > >> On Mar 25, 2020, at 00:47, Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com <mailto:tstellar at redhat.com>> wrote: > >> > >> On 03/24/2020 09:00 PM, Petr Hosek via llvm-dev wrote: > >>> In October, there was a discussion about updating CMake to 3.15: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-October/136295.html <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-October/136295.html>. No decision was made, but maybe we should revisit that proposal? If we're going to require a newer version of CMake for some subprojects, I'd...
2015 Feb 24
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Raise minimum required CMake version to 3.0
> On Feb 24, 2015, at 8:45 AM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > > On 09.02.2015 20:12, Chris Bieneman wrote: >> It came up on another thread that our current minimum required CMake version 2.8.8, has some bugs that cause issues when building with MSVC + Ninja, and one potential solution was to raise the minimum required version of CMake. >> >> CMake 3.0 is now 6 months old and CMake 3.1 has been released. I would like to propose moving our minimum required CMake...
2014 Feb 02
5
[LLVMdev] Some CMake issues (Are you being served?)
Hello, I work on CMake upstream. I'd like to find out in what ways CMake upstream does not fit the needs of llvm/clang, and then fill those gaps. The recent update of the minimum version to CMake 2.8.8 is a good start. Before being able to assess what is missing, it should be ensured that the current codebase is...
2015 Feb 03
14
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Progress report on CMake build system's ability to replace autoconf
So, we’ve had this conversation a few times, and I wanted to coalate a status report for all the interested parties. Here's the outstanding work and my (not necissarily correct) view of the status and importance of each one: * Bug 12157 - llvmconfig.cmake.in make cmake installations not relocatable - There are patches on the bug that we should review, test, and land * Bug 14109 - CMake build for compiler-rt should use just-built clang - Still waiting for patches, I don't think this is a blocker * Bug 15493 - No option to build shared libLL...
2020 Mar 25
6
Bumping the CMake requirement for libc++ and libc++abi
On 03/25/2020 06:20 AM, Louis Dionne wrote: > > >> On Mar 25, 2020, at 00:47, Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On 03/24/2020 09:00 PM, Petr Hosek via llvm-dev wrote: >>> In October, there was a discussion about updating CMake to 3.15: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-October/136295.html. No decision was made, but maybe we should revisit that proposal? If we're going to require a newer version of CMake for some subprojects, I'd prefer to bump the minimum CMake version for all of LLVM. > > My p...
2014 Feb 12
4
[LLVMdev] llvm trunk build failed in cmake_install.cmake on ARM platform
Hi dear list, I tried to build llvm+clang on an OpenSuse BuildServer for ARM. The build was carried out with CMake 2.8.11. In the installation step I got the following error: > [26815s] -- Installing: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/llvm-3.4.99-336.1.arm/usr/lib/libLLVMSupport.so > [26815s] CMake Error at lib/Support/cmake_install.cmake:45 (FILE): > [26815s] file RPATH_CHANGE could not write new RP...
2012 Oct 05
4
[LLVMdev] problem with my LLVM pass
hi, i am wondering if this link is still updated? http://www.llvm.org/docs/CMake.html#developing-llvm-pass-out-of-source i follow the instruction from the link, and create in my ~/test/ directory the CMakeLists.txt with following content: $cat test/CMakeLists.txt find_package(LLVM) # Define add_llvm_* macro's. include(AddLLVM) add_definitions(${LLVM_DEFINITIONS}) inclu...
2020 Mar 26
2
Bumping the CMake requirement for libc++ and libc++abi
...tetreau at quicinc.com> wrote: > > I would like to just chime in and say that I’m fairly strongly opposed to any blanket version increases without justification. Having a low version requirement is a feature. It means that more people can build the codebase. We should increase the minimum CMake version requirement only if we need to do so in order to use a new feature. We should be disciplined in deciding when to use new features if they result in the minimum CMake version being increased too much. What recent Linux LTS distros ship can help inform these decisions, but we shouldn’t just u...
2017 May 29
0
[PATCH] Add CMake build script
Description =========== This patch adds support of CMake meta build system, so you can generate Unix makefiles, VS 6.0-2017 projects and many more. Features ======== * Win32 and Linux tested * Travis CI test added * Generates working Visual Studio 6.0-2017 solutions * Generates working Unix Makefile * Supported options (<option> - <default val...
2015 Feb 24
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Raise minimum required CMake version to 3.0
...lt;beanz at apple.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Feb 24, 2015, at 8:45 AM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >>> >>> On 09.02.2015 20:12, Chris Bieneman wrote: >>>> It came up on another thread that our current minimum required CMake version 2.8.8, has some bugs that cause issues when building with MSVC + Ninja, and one potential solution was to raise the minimum required version of CMake. >>>> >>>> CMake 3.0 is now 6 months old and CMake 3.1 has been released. I would like to propose moving our minimum...
2015 May 28
7
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Late May Update: Progress report on CMake build system's ability to replace autoconf
Hi all, Time for another update on the status of the CMake build system. Completed: * Bug 18496 - [cmake] .S assembly files not compiled by cmake in libclang_rt.ARCH * Bug 22725 - lldb build with cmake fails with "Program error: Invalid parameters entered, -h for help. " * Update GettingStarted to prefer CMake Still Outstanding: * Bug 14109 -...
2015 Feb 24
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Raise minimum required CMake version to 3.0
My list of useful features in newer CMake versions, that I would like to see used: CMake 2.8.10 * INTERFACE_LIBRARY (we already use this by hacking around the CMake version) CMake 2.8.11 * Targets can now have dependencies that are arbitrary files instead of just link dependencies (http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Epics/CMake_target_u...