Jim Crafton
2010-Jan-22 14:09 UTC
[LLVMdev] how to compile asm output for x86 with Micorsoft's ML
It would be nice to be able to use clang/llvm without GNU toolchain dependencies. Just out of curioisty what does the --x86-asm-syntax=intel actually mean then? Does this not get used? Is this a different syntax than the AT&T variety (forgive me if this is an obvious question)? I tried downloading FASM last night and it seemed handle some of the output, the one thing it didn't like was the string variable. It complained about mov DWORD PTR [ESP], ($_.str) something about "$_.str" wasn't kosher. On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:> > On Jan 21, 2010, at 2:01 PM, Jim Crafton wrote: > >>> Nope, llvm's .s output is only compatible with GAS and other at&t syntax >>> assemblers. It turns out that MASM syntax is highly ambiguous and MASM >>> is >>> not production quality for use by a compiler. This is why visual studio >>> doesn't go through it. Long term, we'd like LLVM to be able to write out >>> .o >>> files directly, if you're interested in adding PECOFF support, that would >>> be >>> very nice :)Regarding the pecoff support - FASM comes with complete source and what appears to be a BSD license. It outputs to pecoff. Assuming the FASM code is readable and reasonably understandable, could this code be used as a starting point for adding pecoff support? Isn't it the case that when llvm gets to this phase, all the optimizations have been done, everything else is complete, the only thing left is just outputting to assembly or some other format right? Perhaps I'm being hopelessly optimistic, but if that were the case that doesn't sound like it would be that hard. Of course what do I know? :) Cheers Jim
Jim Crafton
2010-Jan-22 14:34 UTC
[LLVMdev] how to compile asm output for x86 with Micorsoft's ML
> Regarding the pecoff support - FASM comes with complete source and > what appears to be a BSD license. It outputs to pecoff. Assuming the > FASM code is readable and reasonably understandable, could this codeScratch all that, my mistake, it's all assembly. Cheers Jim
Paul Davey
2010-Feb-06 00:36 UTC
[LLVMdev] how to compile asm output for x86 with Micorsoft's ML
if you dont want GNU deps then perhaps try using yasm, it supposedly supports GAS syntax and should run pretty standalone. http://www.tortall.net/projects/yasm/wiki/Download -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100206/a1dcd03d/attachment.html>
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [LLVMdev] how to compile asm output for x86 with Micorsoft's ML
- [LLVMdev] how to compile asm output for x86 with Micorsoft's ML
- [LLVMdev] how to compile asm output for x86 with Micorsoft's ML
- [LLVMdev] how to compile asm output for x86 with Micorsoft's ML
- [LLVMdev] how to compile asm output for x86 with Micorsoft's ML