search for: tortal

...ojects/nasm ) - it can be used both in Windows and in Linux (and MacOS), without any syntax change. The only drawback for it is the LGPL license, which allows some developers to link to it only using NASM like an external tool or a dynamic library, not as a static library. 2. YASM ( http://www.tortall.net/projects/yasm/ ) - it is NASM compatible and has a BSD license, much as llvm has. A strong point for YASM is that it is from start built like a library (the same as llvm), so it can be simply integrated in a developer tool. YASM is my personal favorite for llvm integration. 3. FASM ( http...

It would be nice to be able to use clang/llvm without GNU toolchain dependencies. Just out of curioisty what does the --x86-asm-syntax=intel actually mean then? Does this not get used? Is this a different syntax than the AT&T variety (forgive me if this is an obvious question)? I tried downloading FASM last night and it seemed handle some of the output, the one thing it didn't like was

> Regarding the pecoff support - FASM comes with complete source and > what appears to be a BSD license. It outputs to pecoff. Assuming the > FASM code is readable and reasonably understandable, could this code Scratch all that, my mistake, it's all assembly. Cheers Jim

Hello, Henrik. You wrote Tuesday, July 12, 2005, 3:49:07 PM: B> Are the MASM backend compatible with the MS version of MASM or other not so HB> license restrictive versions of or similar to MS MASM? Btw, maybe, it will be fine, if this backend will be tested for work with YASM? (http://www.tortall.net/projects/yasm/). It seems, that YASM grows fast during last months. It also supports AMD64 syntax, which might be helpful.... -- With best regards, Anton mailto:asl at math.spbu.ru Tuesday, July 12, 2005 9:45:23 PM Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint-Pet...

On Mon, 12 May 2008, Lokesh Kumar wrote: > I am just curious to know when will the llvm-db be released. I hope I > am posting in the right forum. In the latest release 2.2, the llvm-db > binary doesn't appear to load the symbol table or debug the bytecode. > It spits out a message saying that this feature is still not > implemented. There is no current plan (that I know of) to

....python.org/ftp/python/2.7.13/Python-2.7.13.tgz * gcc 4.9.4 can be obtained at http://gcc.parentingamerica.com/releases/gcc-4.9.4/gcc-4.9.4.tar.bz2 * gcc 5.4.0 can be obtained at http://gcc.parentingamerica.com/releases/gcc-5.4.0/gcc-5.4.0.tar.bz2 * YASM 1.3.0 can be obtained at http://www.tortall.net/projects/yasm/releases/yasm-1.3.0.tar.gz ======================================================================== -- Walter Dnes <waltdnes at waltdnes.org>

Hi all, I am just curious to know when will the llvm-db be released. I hope I am posting in the right forum. In the latest release 2.2, the llvm-db binary doesn't appear to load the symbol table or debug the bytecode. It spits out a message saying that this feature is still not implemented. Thanks & Regards, -Lokesh -- "It is not God that is worshipped but the group or authority