Sunday January 31 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:38PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] The PBQP Allocator: Status update, and who might want to use it. |
10:36PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Adding CFG edges for null pointer exceptions? |
8:29PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Compiling Kaleidoscope on Windows |
8:14PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Compiling Kaleidoscope on Windows |
8:02PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Compiling Kaleidoscope on Windows |
7:24PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Redefining function |
5:08PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Boehm GC + static variables? |
4:49PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Redefining function |
3:35PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Redefining function |
2:47PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Compiling Kaleidoscope on Windows |
2:44PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Redefining function |
2:21PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Compiling Kaleidoscope on Windows |
2:12PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Boehm GC + static variables? |
2:02PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Compiling Kaleidoscope on Windows |
12:53PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Boehm GC + static variables? |
11:44AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Segmentation Fault |
5:25AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Redefining function |
4:18AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Segmentation Fault |
2:28AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Crash in PBQP register allocator |
2:22AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Redefining function |
1:57AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Compiling Kaleidoscope on Windows |
12:25AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 question |
|
Saturday January 30 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:38PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Redefining function |
10:03PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Redefining function |
7:25PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] 2.7 Release Schedule |
4:54PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [patch] MicroBlaze Backend |
4:47PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Compiling Kaleidoscope on Windows |
1:54PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Redefining function |
12:49PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [patch] MicroBlaze Backend |
4:27AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 question |
12:43AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [patch] MicroBlaze Backend |
12:23AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 question |
|
Friday January 29 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:16PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Distribution in assembler format |
10:58PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 question |
10:55PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 question |
10:49PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 question |
10:01PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 question |
8:40PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Distribution in assembler format |
8:26PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Distribution in assembler format |
8:22PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Distribution in assembler format |
8:09PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] C code generation from LLVM IR |
8:09PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Distribution in assembler format |
7:55PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] C code generation from LLVM IR |
7:51PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Distribution in assembler format |
7:50PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Redefining function |
7:17PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] Distribution in assembler format |
5:42PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [patch] MicroBlaze Backend |
2:25PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] 64bit MRV problem: { float, float, float} -> { double, float } |
1:58PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] 64bit MRV problem: { float, float, float} -> { double, float } |
8:24AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Where to find the doxygen of old llvm |
7:52AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Where to find the doxygen of old llvm |
2:29AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] llc generated machine assembly code for NASM |
|
Thursday January 28 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:38PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] function inlining of llvm-gcc versus gcc, and llvm-g++ versus g++? |
10:16PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] RTTI Madness |
10:14PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llc generated machine assembly code for NASM |
10:11PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RTTI Madness |
8:45PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] RTTI Madness |
8:25PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [patch] Union Types - work in progress |
7:57PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] llc generated machine assembly code for NASM |
7:53PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM |
7:51PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] llc generated machine assembly code for NASM |
7:41PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llc generated machine assembly code for NASM |
6:51PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] llc generated machine assembly code for NASM |
6:04PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm interpreter cannot execute llvm-gcc generated bitcode |
4:52PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] llvm interpreter cannot execute llvm-gcc generated bitcode |
2:22PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] about pointer type |
11:27AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] question when -march=mips |
9:31AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] llc generated assembly does not work with gcc 3.4.4 |
9:15AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llc generated assembly does not work with gcc 3.4.4 |
8:52AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] llc generated assembly does not work with gcc 3.4.4 |
8:49AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] About setting up official git & bzr mirrors. |
8:18AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llc generated machine assembly code for NASM |
8:12AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Crash in PBQP register allocator |
3:28AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] llc generated machine assembly code for NASM |
1:18AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [patch] Union Types - work in progress |
|
Wednesday January 27 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:53PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] question about running llvm test-suite on remote machine |
11:42PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] question about running llvm test-suite on remote machine |
11:10PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llc generated assembly does not work with gcc 3.4.4 |
9:32PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] What is the latest status of llc support on WIndows platform? |
9:21PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Web Server Restart |
4:01PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Graph Coloring RA |
2:57PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] -Qunused-arguments |
1:26PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Returning a structure |
1:00PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Returning a structure |
9:32AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] llc generated assembly does not work with gcc 3.4.4 |
9:12AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Returning a structure |
8:51AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] cannot find -lgcc_s |
4:34AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] some llvm/clang missed optimizations |
3:42AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] some llvm/clang missed optimizations |
3:05AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] some llvm/clang missed optimizations |
1:55AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] some llvm/clang missed optimizations |
12:07AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] question on instruction selection |
|
Tuesday January 26 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:33PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] New inliner metrics |
11:16PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] question on instruction selection |
10:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] some llvm/clang missed optimizations |
9:52PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Returning a structure |
8:36PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] some llvm/clang missed optimizations |
7:33PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] gdb on Mach-O |
6:59PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llc generated assembly does not work with gcc 3.4.4 |
6:06PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] ambiguity of .align |
3:28PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Evaluatin llvm for an application |
3:12PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Evaluatin llvm for an application |
2:36PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Any extend |
2:31PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] llc generated assembly does not work with gcc 3.4.4 |
2:22PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Any extend |
2:04PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Find all backedges of CFG by MachineDominatorTree. please look at my jpg. |
10:43AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] ambiguity of .align |
5:49AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] another minor problem with the ocaml binding |
4:58AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Crash in PBQP register allocator |
4:44AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] question on instruction selection |
2:43AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ambiguity of .align |
|
Monday January 25 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:07PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Deterministic iteration over llvm iterators |
10:18PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] question on instruction selection |
9:23PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Deterministic iteration over llvm iterators |
5:56PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ambiguity of .align |
5:52PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Any extend |
5:42PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] ambiguity of .align |
5:22PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Any extend |
2:55PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Deterministic code generation and llvm::Iterators |
1:09PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
12:35PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] 64bit MRV problem: { float, float, float} -> { double, float } |
11:57AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] 64bit MRV problem: { float, float, float} -> { double, float } |
10:44AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] 64bit MRV problem: { float, float, float} -> { double, float } |
10:14AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Find all backedges of CFG by MachineDominatorTree. please look at my jpg. |
10:04AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] 64bit MRV problem: { float, float, float} -> { double, float } |
8:57AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Find all backedges of CFG by MachineDominatorTree. please look at my jpg. |
7:45AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] About MachineDominatorTree Pass. |
6:08AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] cannot find -lgcc_s |
|
Sunday January 24 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:02AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Kaleidoscope-tutorial: Fails to create the JIT |
|
Saturday January 23 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:55PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Kaleidoscope-tutorial: Fails to create the JIT |
9:07PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Kaleidoscope-tutorial: Fails to create the JIT |
5:21PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Kaleidoscope-tutorial: Fails to create the JIT |
7:21AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] another small patch to the OCaml binding |
|
Friday January 22 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:24PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] AVX Reorg Patch |
11:20PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] status of EH tests in llvm test-suite |
11:16PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
11:10PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] status of EH tests in llvm test-suite |
11:01PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] status of EH tests in llvm test-suite |
10:37PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
8:55PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Kaleidoscope-tutorial: Fails to create the JIT |
8:04PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] debugging a pass for LTO |
7:30PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] debugging a pass for LTO |
6:56PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Kaleidoscope-tutorial: Fails to create the JIT |
6:29PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] Is it possible to implement target specific optimizations which can be applied after instruction selection or later? |
5:30PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
5:08PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
4:13PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
3:31PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
3:18PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
3:12PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Compiling LLVM under vista with msdev 2008 gives a few errors |
3:01PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Compiling LLVM under vista with msdev 2008 gives a few errors |
2:42PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
2:34PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] how to compile asm output for x86 with Micorsoft's ML |
2:23PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
2:09PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] how to compile asm output for x86 with Micorsoft's ML |
1:58PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
1:55PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
1:40PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
1:39PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
1:29PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
1:25PM |
6 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
1:06PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
1:04PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
12:44PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
11:51AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
11:43AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
11:09AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
10:38AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
10:32AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
10:17AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
9:49AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Make LoopBase inherit from "RegionBase"? |
9:25AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
8:48AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
8:47AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] call graph not complete |
8:43AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
8:29AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
3:20AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] how to compile asm output for x86 with Micorsoft's ML |
|
Thursday January 21 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:58PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
11:50PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling question |
11:50PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Patch for sample project configure.ac |
10:56PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] how to compile asm output for x86 with Micorsoft's ML |
10:01PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] how to compile asm output for x86 with Micorsoft's ML |
9:31PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] how to compile asm output for x86 with Micorsoft's ML |
9:14PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] cygwin/mingw help |
9:07PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] cygwin/mingw help |
8:54PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] how to compile asm output for x86 with Micorsoft's ML |
8:35PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] how to compile asm output for x86 with Micorsoft's ML |
8:26PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] how to compile asm output for x86 with Micorsoft's ML |
7:38PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] FindExecutable |
7:03PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] call graph not complete |
2:51PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to create a CallInst that calls a standard c function like "printf" |
10:20AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ProfileInfo Questions -- How to proceed? |
9:12AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Make LoopBase inherit from "RegionBase"? |
8:58AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] call graph not complete |
8:52AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] call graph not complete |
8:47AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] call graph not complete |
7:28AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] call graph not complete |
5:59AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] call graph not complete |
|
Wednesday January 20 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:07PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Make LoopBase inherit from "RegionBase"? |
10:16PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Bullet Physics for WindRiver's vxWorks? |
10:10PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] updated code size comparison |
8:58PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] updated code size comparison |
8:54PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] updated code size comparison |
8:49PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] updated code size comparison |
8:33PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] updated code size comparison |
8:10PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] updated code size comparison |
8:05PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] updated code size comparison |
7:17PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] updated code size comparison |
6:16PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] updated code size comparison |
3:54PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] updated code size comparison |
3:35PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.6 and Aggregate Return Values: 64 bit |
2:29PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-mc and JIT |
1:20PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.6 and Aggregate Return Values: ARM |
10:07AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.6 and Aggregate Return Values: 64 bit |
9:27AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Profile-Guided Optimization status |
8:52AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] Is there any way to eliminate zero-extension instruction? |
7:55AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] Is there any way to eliminate zero-extension instruction? |
7:34AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] Is it possible to implement target specific optimizations which can be applied after instruction selection or later? |
4:10AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.6 and Aggregate Return Values: 64 bit |
2:20AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Accessing Dwarf data at runtime |
|
Tuesday January 19 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:18PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Question about llvm::dbg() |
7:22PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] compiler-rt project PATCH |
2:57PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] ComplexPattern |
2:06PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Can I port LLVM as a source-to-source compiler? |
12:55PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Frame index arithmetic |
12:27PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Frame index arithmetic |
3:58AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Can I port LLVM as a source-to-source compiler? |
1:10AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Emit rbit, clz on ARM for __builtin_ctz |
|
Monday January 18 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:42PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Any detailed instructions for building LLVM on Win XP? |
9:40PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] [patch] Union Types - work in progress |
7:52PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM |
7:07PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Emit rbit, clz on ARM for __builtin_ctz |
7:02PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Frame index arithmetic |
6:04PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Finding the host datalayout |
4:36PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] JIT on ARM |
1:08PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] How to create a CallInst that calls a standard c function like "printf" |
12:26PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM |
11:27AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM |
8:36AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] question in LLVM IR |
12:23AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM |
12:20AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM |
|
Sunday January 17 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
6:57PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM |
5:35PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM |
5:03PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM |
4:23PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM |
1:00PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Register Spilling and SSA |
12:26PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM |
10:56AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Frame index arithmetic |
9:36AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM |
9:00AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM |
1:44AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM |
|
Saturday January 16 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:20PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM |
9:29PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM |
9:23PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM |
7:15PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [patch] Union Types - work in progress |
6:42PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM |
5:44AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] - Union types, attempt 2 |
2:49AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Build failure in llvm trunk |
2:21AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm opt phase ordering |
2:12AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] mkpatch patch |
1:46AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ExceptionDemo patch |
12:36AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [patch] Union Types - work in progress |
12:14AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] SelectionDAG Debugging |
12:03AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM |
|
Friday January 15 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:54PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM |
11:19PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] - Union types, attempt 2 |
11:13PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] - Union types, attempt 2 |
10:52PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Emit rbit, clz on ARM for __builtin_ctz |
10:34PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] SelectionDAG Debugging |
10:23PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] SelectionDAG Debugging |
9:51PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] - Union types, attempt 2 |
9:38PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] SelectionDAG Debugging |
9:20PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] mkpatch |
9:09PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] SelectionDAG Debugging |
8:54PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM |
8:04PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Emit rbit, clz on ARM for __builtin_ctz |
7:51PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] SelectionDAG Debugging |
7:41PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] SelectionDAG Debugging |
7:37PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Emit rbit, clz on ARM for __builtin_ctz |
7:37PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] - Union types, attempt 2 |
7:31PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] SelectionDAG Debugging |
7:16PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] SelectionDAG Debugging |
7:02PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] - Union types, attempt 2 |
6:03PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Emit rbit, clz on ARM for __builtin_ctz |
3:08PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Register Spilling and SSA |
2:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] SelectionDAG Debugging |
9:24AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Presenting Unsafe Math Flag to Optimizer |
9:10AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add simple cross-block DSE. |
8:55AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Make LoopBase inherit from "RegionBase"? |
8:41AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] - Union types, attempt 2 |
6:13AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Emit rbit, clz on ARM for __builtin_ctz |
6:08AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] - Union types, attempt 2 |
5:55AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] - Union types, attempt 2 |
5:25AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] - Union types, attempt 2 |
4:27AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] - Union types, attempt 2 |
3:44AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] <IsKill> getting from MachineOperand is just <Used> attribute from logic. |
2:39AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] <IsKill> getting from MachineOperand is just <Used> attribute from logic. |
|
Thursday January 14 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:37PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] reminder: internship in Apple's Clang team (applications due Jan 18) |
10:35PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Register Spilling and SSA |
9:56PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Register Spilling and SSA |
5:45PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Presenting Unsafe Math Flag to Optimizer |
4:03PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] FYI: libcpu |
2:07PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Presenting Unsafe Math Flag to Optimizer |
10:32AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Cross-module function inlining |
10:01AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Presenting Unsafe Math Flag to Optimizer |
5:20AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Cross-module function inlining |
1:12AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Presenting Unsafe Math Flag to Optimizer |
12:50AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Presenting Unsafe Math Flag to Optimizer |
12:20AM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] Presenting Unsafe Math Flag to Optimizer |
|
Wednesday January 13 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:54PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to create forward reference to BasicBlock? |
10:28PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] invoke/unwind |
10:27PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to create forward reference to BasicBlock? |
10:10PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] SelectionDAG Debugging |
10:05PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LangRef.html invoke/unwind patch |
9:52PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LangRef.html invoke/unwind patch |
9:03PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Cross-module function inlining |
8:34PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Cross-module function inlining |
8:11PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] - Union types, attempt 2 |
8:05PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Cross-module function inlining |
6:26PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Identifying recursive functions in a backend |
6:02PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] LangRef.html invoke/unwind patch |
5:46PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] invoke/unwind |
5:42PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Identifying recursive functions in a backend |
5:27PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] invoke/unwind |
4:43PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Cross-module function inlining |
4:38PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Cross-module function inlining |
2:28PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] invoke/unwind |
12:08PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] invoke/unwind |
10:07AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] invoke/unwind |
9:40AM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] invoke/unwind |
9:19AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Make LoopBase inherit from "RegionBase"? |
1:46AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] - Union types, attempt 2 |
1:14AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Make LoopBase inherit from "RegionBase"? |
1:01AM |
7 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] - Union types, attempt 2 |
|
Tuesday January 12 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:56PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Make LoopBase inherit from "RegionBase"? |
10:11PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] - Union types, attempt 2 |
6:21PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Setting TARGET_LLCFLAGS in the environment |
6:14PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Extra command line options from the LLVM CommandLine parser |
5:59PM |
8 |
[LLVMdev] Make LoopBase inherit from "RegionBase"? |
5:05PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] Does our own developed module and functions can go along with the future improved version of LLVM? |
4:31PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to use llvm to cross-compile to C |
3:22PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LICM ilist question. |
8:27AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] Does our own developed module and functions can go along with the future improved version of LLVM? |
4:25AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] Does our own developed module and functions can go along with the future improved version of LLVM? |
12:30AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] - Union types, attempt 2 |
|
Monday January 11 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:50PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Setting TARGET_LLCFLAGS in the environment |
10:55PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Operations on constant array value? |
10:37PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LangRef 'struct' patch--preliminary |
10:33PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LangRef 'struct' patch--preliminary |
9:34PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Operations on constant array value? |
9:05PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Using a function from another module |
8:36PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Operations on constant array value? |
8:02PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] - Union types, attempt 2 |
7:39PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Using a function from another module |
7:31PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] LangRef 'struct' patch--preliminary |
7:20PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LangRef 'struct' patch--preliminary |
7:10PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] - Union types, attempt 2 |
7:03PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Operations on constant array value? |
6:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LICM ilist question. |
3:49PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Operations on constant array value? |
3:29PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Operations on constant array value? |
3:07PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Operations on constant array value? |
1:07PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Optimization Help |
9:28AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LangRef 'struct' patch--preliminary |
4:39AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Debugging LLVM opt pass |
|
Sunday January 10 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:17PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] building a llvm-arm-elf crosscompiler on OSX 10.5 |
9:15PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LangRef 'external' patch |
8:50PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] building a llvm-arm-elf crosscompiler on OSX 10.5 |
8:29PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] building a llvm-arm-elf crosscompiler on OSX 10.5 |
7:23PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Using a function from another module |
7:02PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Using a function from another module |
6:38PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Using a function from another module |
6:00PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Cygwin llvm-gcc regression |
5:02PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] From OS X to LINUX |
3:31PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Using a function from another module |
2:58PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Using a function from another module |
1:09PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] From OS X to LINUX |
6:46AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Variable declarations vs. definitions |
5:31AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Variable declarations vs. definitions |
2:53AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Variable declarations vs. definitions |
1:53AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Variable declarations vs. definitions |
12:43AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] building a llvm-arm-elf crosscompiler on OSX 10.5 |
12:11AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Fix nondeterministic behaviour in the CodeExtractor |
|
Saturday January 9 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:22PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] building a llvm-arm-elf crosscompiler on OSX 10.5 |
9:20PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Variable declarations vs. definitions |
9:12PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Variable declarations vs. definitions |
9:11PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Variable declarations vs. definitions |
8:57PM |
7 |
[LLVMdev] Variable declarations vs. definitions |
7:21PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Inlining |
6:35PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Inlining |
6:00PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Inlining |
4:41PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Inlining |
4:35PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Inlining |
3:28PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Two suggestions for improving LLVM error reporting |
3:15PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] building a llvm-arm-elf crosscompiler on OSX 10.5 |
1:07PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Exception Implementation Example added to Wiki |
12:54PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Exception Implementation Example added to Wiki |
9:46AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Inlining |
8:15AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Inlining |
8:07AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Two suggestions for improving LLVM error reporting |
7:00AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] - Union types, attempt 2 |
6:11AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Two suggestions for improving LLVM error reporting |
5:32AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] First-class aggregate semantics |
5:17AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Inlining |
1:55AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] building a llvm-arm-elf crosscompiler on OSX 10.5 |
1:20AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Unaligned SSE Memop Support Patch |
1:06AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Exception Implementation Example added to Wiki |
1:04AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Fix nondeterministic behaviour in the CodeExtractor |
1:01AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Fix nondeterministic behaviour in the CodeExtractor |
12:49AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Using a function from another module |
12:36AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Inlining |
|
Friday January 8 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:10PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Cygwin llvm-gcc regression |
11:08PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Inlining |
10:10PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Inlining |
9:52PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Inlining |
7:27PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Make LoopBase inherit from "RegionBase"? |
7:12PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Exception Implementation Example added to Wiki |
1:16PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] integrate LLVM Poly into existing LLVM infrastructure |
8:56AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] lli segfaults when using JIT in LLVM 2.6 on OS X 10.6/x86 |
6:24AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] First-class aggregate semantics |
3:48AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] First-class aggregate semantics |
2:52AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] First-class aggregate semantics |
2:03AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] First-class aggregate semantics |
12:47AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Removing the constant pool |
12:14AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] sqrt |
12:04AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] sqrt |
|
Thursday January 7 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:53PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] sqrt |
11:52PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Two suggestions for improving LLVM error reporting |
9:57PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] First-class aggregate semantics |
9:56PM |
6 |
[LLVMdev] First-class aggregate semantics |
9:38PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] First-class aggregate semantics |
9:28PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] First-class aggregate semantics |
5:48PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] sqrt |
3:43PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] configuring llvm-gcc 2.6 for mips |
3:06PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] sqrt |
2:30PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] "Value has wrong type!" on Bool:4 bitfield |
1:19PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] configuring llvm-gcc 2.6 for mips |
|
Wednesday January 6 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
9:54PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] something wrong with .ll file? |
9:12PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] something wrong with .ll file? |
8:45PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] - Union types, attempt 2 |
8:41PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Fwd: Correct way to resolve recursive type information? |
5:24PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] License query for demo code |
2:27PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] ipsccp vs getelementptr |
1:20PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Correct way to resolve recursive type information? |
10:39AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Help] How can we call an object's virtual function inside IR? |
9:17AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [Help] calling a native C function from inside LLVM IR |
1:39AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] "Graphite" for llvm [building infrastructure] |
1:29AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] "Graphite" for llvm [building infrastructure] |
12:58AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add simple cross-block DSE. |
|
Tuesday January 5 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:34PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM C bindings and Boehm GC |
10:46PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Help adding the Bullet physics sdk benchmark to the LLVM test suite? |
10:28PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Help adding the Bullet physics sdk benchmark to the LLVM test suite? |
10:13PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Help adding the Bullet physics sdk benchmark to the LLVM test suite? |
9:57PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Help adding the Bullet physics sdk benchmark to the LLVM test suite? |
9:39PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Fwd: [TSG-Announce] network upgrades 6-8am: 3rd floor tomorrow, 4th floor Thursday |
9:38PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Help adding the Bullet physics sdk benchmark to the LLVM test suite? |
8:53PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Help adding the Bullet physics sdk benchmark to the LLVM test suite? |
8:49PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] make fails to detect changes in case srcdir != objdir |
8:21PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] make fails to detect changes in case srcdir != objdir |
7:53PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] AVX Testcases |
7:52PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] test-suite/libcalls: unbreak build |
7:42PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] test-suite/libcalls: unbreak build |
7:33PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] make fails to detect changes in case srcdir != objdir |
7:27PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] test-suite/libcalls: unbreak build |
7:20PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] AVX Testcases |
7:05PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] make fails to detect changes in case srcdir != objdir |
6:31PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] TableGen !eq() Operator Patch |
6:18PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] make fails to detect changes in case srcdir != objdir |
6:07PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] About LLVM |
6:05PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] test-suite/libcalls: unbreak build |
5:59PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] TableGen !eq() Operator Patch |
5:54PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] AVX Testcases |
5:53PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Non-temporal moves in memset [Was: ASM output with JIT / codegen barriers] |
5:30PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] make fails to detect changes in case srcdir != objdir |
4:38PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Removing the constant pool |
2:41PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Removing the constant pool |
2:22PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] test-suite/libcalls: unbreak build |
2:01PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Any reason why fastcc on x86 shouldn't use ECX as a return register? |
1:43PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] libcalls test fails to run |
10:59AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Help] How can we call an object's virtual function inside IR? |
10:35AM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] [Help] How can we call an object's virtual function inside IR? |
10:11AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] test-suite/bullet: unbreak linking |
9:38AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] make fails to detect changes in case srcdir != objdir |
7:22AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Any reason why fastcc on x86 shouldn't use ECX as a return register? |
6:34AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] bug |
6:09AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ASM output with JIT / codegen barriers |
5:46AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Problem running 2.6 test-suite on cygwin |
4:53AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Clang "warning: cannot find entry symbol mit-llvm-bc" |
4:51AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] ASM output with JIT / codegen barriers |
4:48AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [Please help] Is there any option to make static library files ( .a) to shared libraries (.so) ? |
3:25AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [llvm] r92458 - in /llvm/trunk: lib/Target/README.txt lib/Transforms/Scalar/InstructionCombining.cpp test/Transforms/InstCombine/or.ll |
2:43AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ASM output with JIT / codegen barriers |
2:11AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Help adding the Bullet physics sdk benchmark to the LLVM test suite? |
1:39AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Metadata |
1:22AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Metadata |
|
Monday January 4 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:14PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Metadata |
10:31PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] "Graphite" for llvm |
10:09PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Assembly Printer |
9:13PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] ASM output with JIT / codegen barriers |
9:07PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add InstCombine to CMake. |
6:50PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] change type allocoted register |
6:00PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Automatic Vectorization |
3:32PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] test-suite/bullet: fix build in case $LLVM_SRC_ROOT != $LLVM_OBJ_ROOT |
2:40PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] C library function declarations |
1:41PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] C library function declarations |
1:37PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] 答复: 答复: [LLVMdev] How to bind a register variable with a given general purpose register? |
12:14PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] support for attach embedded metadata to function/argument/basicblock proposal |
11:29AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] 答复: [LLVMdev] How to bind a register variable with a given general purpose register? |
11:03AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Tail Call Optimisation |
10:45AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Getting Kaleidoscope to compile |
10:43AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] C library function declarations |
10:37AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Getting Kaleidoscope to compile |
10:28AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Help Required for LLVM |
10:27AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Getting Kaleidoscope to compile |
10:19AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Getting Kaleidoscope to compile |
9:35AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ASM output with JIT / codegen barriers |
9:17AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] ASM output with JIT / codegen barriers |
8:31AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Help Required for LLVM |
8:20AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ASM output with JIT / codegen barriers |
6:10AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] ASM output with JIT / codegen barriers |
5:16AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Tail Call Optimisation |
4:50AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Tail Call Optimisation |
4:01AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Tail Call Optimisation |
3:33AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Tail Call Optimisation |
2:59AM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] How to bind a register variable with a given general purpose register? |
1:12AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Tail Call Optimisation |
|
Sunday January 3 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
6:41PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Fwd: Help Required for LLVM] |
6:38PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Help Required for LLVM |
12:54PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] safe to speculatively execute load of malloc? |
11:33AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] 'Address of Label and Indirect Branches in LLVM IR' blog post |
9:17AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] 'Address of Label and Indirect Branches in LLVM IR' blog post |
8:33AM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] 'Address of Label and Indirect Branches in LLVM IR' blog post |
7:00AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Assembly Printer |
|
Saturday January 2 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:36PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] inbounds (was Re: indirectbr) |
10:31PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] inbounds (was Re: indirectbr) |
7:24PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] indirectbr |
7:03PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] indirectbr |
6:33PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] indirectbr |
3:52PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Adding a new instruction? |
|
Friday January 1 2010 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
8:51PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Assembly Printer |
8:35PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Parallelism in HLVM |
5:03AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] How does JIT/lli work with bc file? |
4:31AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Can Interpreter handle clone() call (with CLONE_VM flag)? |