search for: micorsoft

...vqcl wrote: > Oops. It seems that vsnprintf_s isn't always available on MinGW platform: > MinGW declares this function only if MINGW_HAS_SECURE_API macro is defined. > That's because WinXP version of msvcrt.dll doesn't contain secure functions > like vsnprintf_s. I thought Micorsoft had recently stopped supporting WinXP. If Micorsoft has stopped supporting it I see no reason for FLAC to support it. Cheers, Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/

I was recently trying to compile some bitcode generated like so: llc --x86-asm-syntax=intel test.out it generates a test.out.s file, and while I'm not much of an assembly person, it looks OK. When I feed this to ML ml test.out.s I get tons of errors, most of which appear to be syntax errors. Stuff like: test.out.s(2) : error A2008:syntax error : . error A2008:syntax error :

Jim Crafton <jim.crafton at gmail.com> writes: [snip] > I looked around a bit but couldn't find anything. The example on the > llvm site mentions being able to compile to C code, but when I try llc > -march=c test.out > > it errors out with: > error: invalid target 'c'. [snip] > Registered Targets: > x86 - 32-bit X86: Pentium-Pro and above

> By default, the cmake build generates Visual Studio project files for > the X86 target only. Take a look at > > http://www.llvm.org/docs/CMake.html#llvmvars > > for learning how to build other targets. OK thanks, I'll look at that. In the meantime, is it possible to get the assembly generated by llc to work wiht ML? That would probably be the ideal solution. Cheers Jim

On Jan 21, 2010, at 12:54 PM, Jim Crafton wrote: >> By default, the cmake build generates Visual Studio project files for >> the X86 target only. Take a look at >> >> http://www.llvm.org/docs/CMake.html#llvmvars >> >> for learning how to build other targets. > > OK thanks, I'll look at that. > > In the meantime, is it possible to get the

Did pecoff support means we can linkage llvm generated obj files to msvc's obj files? 2010/1/22, Jim Crafton <jim.crafton at gmail.com>: >> Nope, llvm's .s output is only compatible with GAS and other at&t syntax >> assemblers.  It turns out that MASM syntax is highly ambiguous and MASM is >> not production quality for use by a compiler.  This is why visual

It would be nice to be able to use clang/llvm without GNU toolchain dependencies. Just out of curioisty what does the --x86-asm-syntax=intel actually mean then? Does this not get used? Is this a different syntax than the AT&T variety (forgive me if this is an obvious question)? I tried downloading FASM last night and it seemed handle some of the output, the one thing it didn't like was

> Regarding the pecoff support - FASM comes with complete source and > what appears to be a BSD license. It outputs to pecoff. Assuming the > FASM code is readable and reasonably understandable, could this code Scratch all that, my mistake, it's all assembly. Cheers Jim

I've gotten Microsoft Money Sunset running under wine following the instructions here... http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=21030 Application runs fine for the most part. But I'm having two problems. Money must use some internal web thingy (technical term) and uses it for it's pages. Every time it starts up, I need to open them. I'm thinking that

In order to make it shut down properly you may try the following. In Wine configuration , "Graphics" tab, check "Emulate a virtual desktop". Now all wine porgrams will be opened "inside" or "above" a Windows' blue desktop area. Now when you want to shutdown MS Money, use mouse right-click on the task bar -> "Close", instead of Money window

Hey guys, I got Money Plus Deluxe Sunset working without ever seeing this thread, but these are the same to issues I had to conquer. I posted these on my AppDB test data submission as well, but thought I'd post it here for your convenience (if you're still trying to get it to work, that is). 1st, the dialog box on each page load; Solution: use winetricks ie8 instead of ie6 2nd, the app

On Jan 21, 2010, at 2:01 PM, Jim Crafton wrote: >> Nope, llvm's .s output is only compatible with GAS and other at&t >> syntax >> assemblers. It turns out that MASM syntax is highly ambiguous and >> MASM is >> not production quality for use by a compiler. This is why visual >> studio >> doesn't go through it. Long term, we'd like

Greetings Group I think the Word crashing problem is quite common and does not confine itself to Samba as PDC. Running Word with any file open on a Samba server seems to invite trouble and file trashing. This seems to more of a problem with Win2000 and XP than Win9X and NT. I suspect that Micorsoft have "improved" the code to "optimise" performance for Micorsoft servers... In my particular case we have found that "no oplocks" reduces the rate of file trashing...but am not sure if this totally fixes the problem yet. A very worrying syndrome for us Linux adminz...

> Nope, llvm's .s output is only compatible with GAS and other at&t syntax > assemblers.  It turns out that MASM syntax is highly ambiguous and MASM is > not production quality for use by a compiler.  This is why visual studio > doesn't go through it.  Long term, we'd like LLVM to be able to write out .o > files directly, if you're interested in adding PECOFF

Hai James, So a windows xp works but Win7/10 not, at least is good hint. So, i did have a look in my setup again. And i'm thinking, i have disabled ipv6 for my windows 7 and win 10 pc's. That may be an option.. A thing you can try, have a look here : http://www.bvanleeuwen.nl/faq/?p=1142 ipv6 Admx to simple disable ipv6. I've set : Disable all IPv6 components. I also

Hi anybody knows the difference between SMB that samba is based on and CIFS that microsoft owns. Windows 2k is based on CIFS right? what version and what is Samba 2.2.5 is based on ? SMB or CIFS thanks in advance

Janne Hyv?rinen wrote: > Some comments for patch #1, I chose the non-secure versions because they > are faster and produce smaller binary. The functions where these > printings are performed can't in my opinion ever exceed the safety > margin of 32 KB. They print short help and error texts and occasionally > filename, which with APIs is restricted to 260 characters. And you

Hai James, > On a side not even if I manually create a A RR and select "create > associated pointer (PTR) record" in the Micorsoft DNS snap in. A PTR > record does not get created. Thats correct, you need to do that manualy if you use windows tools. > I can see in a > wireshark capture the XP client request a PTR update. A Windows 7 client > does not. Not even clients with static IP's. I'll chalk this up...

...pe that - well relaxed and burning for action ;-) - you will be able to find some time soon to look into my findings so far, because IMHO the results are interesting and - while they have uncovered that the performance regression most likely is not directly a Samba issue, but rather an issue in Micorsoft's SMB2/3 client - I still hope that you and the Samba team will be able to address this issue with Microsoft (much better than I would be able to as an individual without your background/backing) such that the whole SMB communitiy will take profit from properly addressing/fixing it... ;-)...

I have been wondering if anyone here knows which format is faster for your templates? I am curious cause in the near future I may be using some expensive scripts (timewise) and would like to try and squeak out as much performance as possible. Is Ruby like other languages (ASP classic for example) that inccur a penalty by switching between HTML and Ruby Code? Ben -- Posted via