search for: yasm

Hi, I'm in the process of adding a X86 ASM Printer for outputting the asm in a style that Yasm can take without any post processing. Yasm's format is very close to that of intel. I was wondering if my approach is correct: I've made a custom MCAsmStreamer to remove some of the COFF symbol directives that yasm doesn't understand. I've made a X86YasmInstPrinter, and added it...

I'm still not catching on to the "new" of CentOS 8 yum install yasm Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:32 ago on Sat 05 Oct 2019 12:46:16 PM EDT. No match for argument: yasm Error: Unable to find a match yum install yasm-devel Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:37 ago on Sat 05 Oct 2019 12:46:16 PM EDT. No match for argument: yasm-devel Error: Unable to find...

Hi, I've finally got my Yasm instruction printer sorted, and I was wondering if it is something the community would want? With it, it means you can take LLVM IR and generate a .S that can be assembled using Yasm to a window's OBJ for inclusion in normal DevStudio projects. The change set isn't large, but I am unsure...

Hi, A while ago I posted about implementing something to print ASM in a format that the YASM assembler can handle, well, I've got a small change set that does just that. We're compiling non-trival programs with it for Win32/Metro so it seems to work :-) Having little exposure to the LLVM codebase, I'm not 100% sure of the coding guidelines, or what the repercussions of some...

Can Syslinux be built with yasm rather than NASM? Richard

>On Jan 29, 2017 3:19 PM, "Richard Melville via Syslinux" <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > >Can Syslinux be built with yasm rather than NASM? > >Richard > > >Considering the specifics of the build that depend on nasm specific behaviors, probably >not. Have you tried? > > Not yet, but I'm about to soon. I'll report back. Richard

...sourceforge.net/projects/nasm ) - it can be used both in Windows and in Linux (and MacOS), without any syntax change. The only drawback for it is the LGPL license, which allows some developers to link to it only using NASM like an external tool or a dynamic library, not as a static library. 2. YASM ( http://www.tortall.net/projects/yasm/ ) - it is NASM compatible and has a BSD license, much as llvm has. A strong point for YASM is that it is from start built like a library (the same as llvm), so it can be simply integrated in a developer tool. YASM is my personal favorite for llvm integrat...

Hi, It doesn't compile with yasm, or nasm (reports invalid combination of opcode and operands), and mov _x,EAX is meaningless as _x is just a label (an numeric constant that happens to be an address), so it would have to be dereferenced to get to the memory at that address, otherwise it's like saying mov 0x12341234, EAX No...

...r building, and nothing else. Currently just Pale Moon, but other software could also be built. Other people are interested in doing the same. My choices are... * explain how to install CentOS 6.5, which options to choose, turn off boot-to-gui, and how to download and build newer gcc, yasm, and python-2.7 to duplicate my build environment, etc, etc. * or send out a 1.3 gigabyte centos65.tar.xz and give simple instructions to extract the archive, copy over /etc/resolv.conf, bind-mount /dev and /proc, chroot into the directory, and get going right away. I'm not...

Hi Matthew, On Feb 15, 2012, at 5:42 PM, Matthew Huck wrote: > Hi, > It doesn't compile with yasm, or nasm Where did you get the idea that "Intel syntax" means NASM? LLVM actually produces assembly files that can be fed to GAS, or to LLVM's MC framework. (In fact, it's missing a .intel_syntax directive so GAS knows it needs to assemble instructions according to Intel syntax.)...

On Mon, 12 May 2008, Lokesh Kumar wrote: > I am just curious to know when will the llvm-db be released. I hope I > am posting in the right forum. In the latest release 2.2, the llvm-db > binary doesn't appear to load the symbol table or debug the bytecode. > It spits out a message saying that this feature is still not > implemented. There is no current plan (that I know of) to

I've tried compiling with tinycc, and assembling with yasm, and fasm even with intel syntax. I'm just wondering what available compilers and assemblers there are without trying every one of them. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090408/b779a781/att...

Hello, Henrik. You wrote Tuesday, July 12, 2005, 3:49:07 PM: B> Are the MASM backend compatible with the MS version of MASM or other not so HB> license restrictive versions of or similar to MS MASM? Btw, maybe, it will be fine, if this backend will be tested for work with YASM? (http://www.tortall.net/projects/yasm/). It seems, that YASM grows fast during last months. It also supports AMD64 syntax, which might be helpful.... -- With best regards, Anton mailto:asl at math.spbu.ru Tuesday, July 12, 2005 9:45:23 PM Faculty of Mathematics &...

Are there any dependencies that I need, but don't have? I've got doxygen, libogg, automake, autoconf, libtool, valgrind, docbook, nasm, yasm, libiconv. the Autogen.sh script fails with: "Updating build configuration files for FLAC, please wait.... configure.ac:308: warning: macro 'AM_ICONV' not found in library configure.ac:309: warning: macro 'AM_LANGINFO_CODESET' not found in library glibtoolize: putting auxilia...

Hi all, I am just curious to know when will the llvm-db be released. I hope I am posting in the right forum. In the latest release 2.2, the llvm-db binary doesn't appear to load the symbol table or debug the bytecode. It spits out a message saying that this feature is still not implemented. Thanks & Regards, -Lokesh -- "It is not God that is worshipped but the group or authority

...his way? Why not just write in C?*And there's only so much assembly you can learn by calling C functions, instead of writing lower level code. I understand that OS's have different conventions for I/O, but what I don't understand is why multiplatform assembly languages like LLVM, NASM, YASM, FASM, and Gas don't give coders an macro or instruction set that gets expanded to the actual, per-OS instructions during assembly. I guess it lowers development efforts to reuse libc rather than add multiplatform I/O assembly macros. Smaller, non-libc dependent binaries don't matter in a w...

...;hello world" app in llvm, making the .bc file using 'llvm-as test.llvm -o=test.bc' works fine. then I can use llvm-ld to make an executable which then runs fine (although not native), and I can use llc to build the .bc file into a .s file. So far I'm all good... But neither masm, yasm, tasm, fasm, gcc, as, or nasm take the .s file. I only found one other post about this where it was mentioned that only 'GAS" can compile it, so I tried this in both Cygwin and Ubuntu, but to no avail. In cygwin I get: $ gcc /cygdrive/d/test.s /cygdrive/d/test.s: Assembler messages: /cyg...

> I've tried compiling with tinycc, and assembling with yasm, and fasm even > with intel syntax. I'm just wondering what available compilers and > assemblers there are without trying every one of them. gas -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

It would be nice to be able to use clang/llvm without GNU toolchain dependencies. Just out of curioisty what does the --x86-asm-syntax=intel actually mean then? Does this not get used? Is this a different syntax than the AT&T variety (forgive me if this is an obvious question)? I tried downloading FASM last night and it seemed handle some of the output, the one thing it didn't like was

> Regarding the pecoff support - FASM comes with complete source and > what appears to be a BSD license. It outputs to pecoff. Assuming the > FASM code is readable and reasonably understandable, could this code Scratch all that, my mistake, it's all assembly. Cheers Jim