Dan Gohman
2010-Jan-05 21:57 UTC
[LLVMdev] Help adding the Bullet physics sdk benchmark to the LLVM test suite?
On Jan 5, 2010, at 1:38 PM, David Greene wrote:> I don't think there's a flag that says "don't do anything risky, > ever.""Don't do anything risky with floating-point" is the default mode. If you're aware of any unsafe floating-point optimizations being done by default, please file a bug.> For example, a gfortran-fronted LLVM should have a way to always respect > ordering indicated by parentheses. I don't know if gfortran even has that, > let alone LLVM proper.LLVM does not currently re-associate floating-point values, so this hasn't been an issue. Dan
David Greene
2010-Jan-05 22:28 UTC
[LLVMdev] Help adding the Bullet physics sdk benchmark to the LLVM test suite?
On Tuesday 05 January 2010 15:57, Dan Gohman wrote:> On Jan 5, 2010, at 1:38 PM, David Greene wrote: > > I don't think there's a flag that says "don't do anything risky, > > ever." > > "Don't do anything risky with floating-point" is the default mode. If > you're aware of any unsafe floating-point optimizations being done by > default, please file a bug.Ok. It seems that something is causing a problem if Bullet is failing. -Dave
Erwin Coumans
2010-Jan-05 22:46 UTC
[LLVMdev] Help adding the Bullet physics sdk benchmark to the LLVM test suite?
We haven't determined what 'failing' means or what the 'correct' behaviour is. Imagine a ball at the top of a rounded hill. If the ball is not exactly at the top but a tiny amount on the left it will roll left, but a tiny amount on the right it will roll right. The difference in initial position can be negligible but the final result is miles away. Is there a irc channel or perhaps google wave for a quick chat? Or do people prefer to keep all communication in the mailing list so everyone can participate? Thanks, Erwin 2010/1/5 David Greene <dag at cray.com>> On Tuesday 05 January 2010 15:57, Dan Gohman wrote: > > On Jan 5, 2010, at 1:38 PM, David Greene wrote: > > > I don't think there's a flag that says "don't do anything risky, > > > ever." > > > > "Don't do anything risky with floating-point" is the default mode. If > > you're aware of any unsafe floating-point optimizations being done by > > default, please file a bug. > > Ok. It seems that something is causing a problem if Bullet is failing. > > -Dave > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100105/dd01b06e/attachment.html>
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [LLVMdev] Help adding the Bullet physics sdk benchmark to the LLVM test suite?
- [LLVMdev] Help adding the Bullet physics sdk benchmark to the LLVM test suite?
- [LLVMdev] Help adding the Bullet physics sdk benchmark to the LLVM test suite?
- [LLVMdev] Help adding the Bullet physics sdk benchmark to the LLVM test suite?
- [LLVMdev] Help adding the Bullet physics sdk benchmark to the LLVM test suite?