Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "dd01b06e".
Did you mean:
d701406e
2010 Jan 05
0
[LLVMdev] Help adding the Bullet physics sdk benchmark to the LLVM test suite?
On Tuesday 05 January 2010 15:57, Dan Gohman wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2010, at 1:38 PM, David Greene wrote:
> > I don't think there's a flag that says "don't do anything risky,
> > ever."
>
> "Don't do anything risky with floating-point" is the default mode. If
> you're aware of any unsafe floating-point optimizations being done by
>
2010 Jan 05
1
[LLVMdev] Help adding the Bullet physics sdk benchmark to the LLVM test suite?
...> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100105/dd01b06e/attachment.html>
2010 Jan 05
2
[LLVMdev] Help adding the Bullet physics sdk benchmark to the LLVM test suite?
On Jan 5, 2010, at 1:38 PM, David Greene wrote:
> I don't think there's a flag that says "don't do anything risky,
> ever."
"Don't do anything risky with floating-point" is the default mode. If you're
aware of any unsafe floating-point optimizations being done by default, please
file a bug.
> For example, a gfortran-fronted LLVM should have a way